Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 30 Jan 2025, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2025, 2:37 pm

Tell everyone who Howie Carr is.

Tell everyone your own thoughts.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jan 2025, 5:39 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2025, 5:39 am

Know Howie?

Kneepadder extraordinaire..

Your stupidity must be really painful. 

golfboy » 30 Jan 2025, 7:15 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2025, 7:15 pm

Your stupidity must be really painful.

You don't...

He's a lo-rent Steven Dunleavy.
 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jan 2025, 8:22 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2025, 8:22 pm

You don't...

He's a lo-rent Steven Dunleavy.

And?   Dude, if you can't refute facts, just run away like the little ****** you are. 
 

golfboy » 30 Jan 2025, 9:02 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2025, 9:02 pm

And?   Dude, if you can't refute facts, just run away like the little ****** you are.

may have voted


describe the "thought" process which led you to conclude it is a FACT.

golfboy » 29 Jan 2025, 9:18 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 9:18 pm

Who would have guessed?

Records Show Legal and Illegal Aliens Are Voting in Maine and Costing MaineCare a Fortune

As many as 40 percent of the noncitizens present in Maine, including those who entered the U.S. illegally and those with legal alien status, may have voted in the 2024 elections or had votes cast in their names, according to records obtained and reviewed by the Maine Wire.

So why haven't they dealt with it?

Blackvegetable » 30 Jan 2025, 9:14 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2025, 9:14 pm

may have voted

describe the "thought" process which led you to conclude it is a FACT.

You should read beyond the first paragraph, *******.

"Taken together, the MaineCare records and CVR data offer the first public proof that noncitizens have been illegally registered to vote in Maine and are illegally voting or having illegal votes cast in their names in potentially large numbers."


 

golfboy » 30 Jan 2025, 10:04 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2025, 10:04 pm

You should read beyond the first paragraph, *******.

"Taken together, the MaineCare records and CVR data offer the first public proof that noncitizens have been illegally registered to vote in Maine and are illegally voting or having illegal votes cast in their names in potentially large numbers."

If it constituted proof it would not have been qualified with "may have"

Vegas » 30 Jan 2025, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2025, 3:15 pm

Tell everyone your own thoughts.

Thoughts are ideas about past results. Thinking is comparing next actions to contracting events added so far and details never stay what has Transpired since conceived.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jan 2025, 11:12 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2025, 11:12 pm

If it constituted proof it would not have been qualified with "may have"

Once again, you should read beyond the first paragraph, but if you bothered to educate yourself, you'd probably burst into flames.