Liberal Forum

*Huey » 01 Feb 2025, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 3:03 pm

Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2025, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 2:57 pm

Post the popular vote totals...

Already been done for you and you acknowledged the dems lost roughly 10 million votes under the Biden/Harris regime.

Let's see what trump did:

312 electoral votes.

Won the popular vote with your people losing 10 million from 2020.

Won ALL swing states.

Made games in all most all demographics in all states.

Great job that 13 did. Please, keep posting that.

 

 

Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2025, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 3:14 pm

*Huey » 01 Feb 2025, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 3:03 pm

Already been done for you and you acknowledged the dems lost roughly 10 million votes under the Biden/Harris regime.

Let's see what trump did:

312 electoral votes.

Won the popular vote with your people losing 10 million from 2020.

Won ALL swing states.

Made games in all most all demographics in all states.

Great job that 13 did. Please, keep posting that.

Has never deterred you from rebleating the tired narrative that the simple fact debunks.

 

There are no facts you can debunk what I posted.

He won 312 electoral votes.  FACT!

He WON the popular vote.  FACT.

Harris, running on Biden policy, lost 10 million votes or so from 2020.  FACT

Trum won ALL swing states.

If you can show those are not facts, on your own, bringing your own facts, I will tae a week off.  If you don't, don't ask ANYONE to post the popular vote again.

*Huey » 01 Feb 2025, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 3:03 pm

Already been done for you and you acknowledged the dems lost roughly 10 million votes under the Biden/Harris regime.

Let's see what trump did:

312 electoral votes.

Won the popular vote with your people losing 10 million from 2020.

Won ALL swing states.

Made games in all most all demographics in all states.

Great job that 13 did. Please, keep posting that.

 

Great job that 13 did. Please, keep posting that.

How long after Grifty lost by a popular margin 3x greater than his winning margin in 2024 did you pronounce him 2ndBesty? 

And you have the **** audacity to question APSA's judgment 
 

*Huey » 01 Feb 2025, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 3:21 pm

There are no facts you can debunk what I posted.

He won 312 electoral votes.  FACT!

He WON the popular vote.  FACT.

Harris, running on Biden policy, lost 10 million votes or so from 2020.  FACT

Trum won ALL swing states.

If you can show those are not facts, on your own, bringing your own facts, I will tae a week off.  If you don't, don't ask ANYONE to post the popular vote again.

Post the popular vote margin, Quimmie. 

*Huey » 01 Feb 2025, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 3:21 pm

There are no facts you can debunk what I posted.

He won 312 electoral votes.  FACT!

He WON the popular vote.  FACT.

Harris, running on Biden policy, lost 10 million votes or so from 2020.  FACT

Trum won ALL swing states.

If you can show those are not facts, on your own, bringing your own facts, I will tae a week off.  If you don't, don't ask ANYONE to post the popular vote again.

But is "He" Really the 2nd Coming Grace of "Jesus Christ" either.

So far I dont like the people hes lined up around neither

Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2025, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 3:23 pm

How long after Grifty lost by a popular margin 3x greater than his winning margin in 2024 did you pronounce him 2ndBesty? 

And you have the **** audacity to question APSA's judgment

 

If you can show those are not facts, on your own, bringing your own facts, I will tae a week off.  If you don't, don't ask ANYONE to post the popular vote again.

Sorry, that is not bringing your own facts or debunking the FACTS  posted.

You lose.

*Huey » 01 Feb 2025, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 3:21 pm

There are no facts you can debunk what I posted.

He won 312 electoral votes.  FACT!

He WON the popular vote.  FACT.

Harris, running on Biden policy, lost 10 million votes or so from 2020.  FACT

Trum won ALL swing states.

If you can show those are not facts, on your own, bringing your own facts, I will tae a week off.  If you don't, don't ask ANYONE to post the popular vote again.

If you don't, don't ask ANYONE to post the popular vote again.

Under which particular very special rule of engagement? 

*Huey » 01 Feb 2025, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 3:27 pm

Sorry, that is not bringing your own facts or debunking the FACTS  posted.

You lose.

Don't apologize for running...

It's who you are.
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2025, 3:24 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 3:24 pm

Post the popular vote margin, Quimmie.

Sorry, that is not bringing your own fact to debunk that he won the popular votes.

You lose.

TwoIfByTea » 01 Feb 2025, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 3:25 pm

But is "He" Really the 2nd Coming Grace of "Jesus Christ" either.

So far I dont like the people hes lined up around neither

No, he is not the second coming.  He needs back off blaming DEI for the accident.

*Huey » 01 Feb 2025, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 3:31 pm

Sorry, that is not bringing your own fact to debunk that he won the popular votes.

You lose.

Quimmie,

I understand that The Five doesn't tell you that Grifty's margin was the smallest since 2000. It would render all those slogans they've been feeding you null and void.

Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2025, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 3:30 pm

*Huey » 01 Feb 2025, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 3:27 pm

Sorry, that is not bringing your own facts or debunking the FACTS  posted.

You lose.

Don't apologize for running...

It's who you are.
 

 

I am not running.  You are.  There is nothing you can bring that refutes the facts I posted.  I am not here to do your work. You lose.

Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2025, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 3:29 pm

*Huey » 01 Feb 2025, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 3:21 pm

There are no facts you can debunk what I posted.

He won 312 electoral votes.  FACT!

He WON the popular vote.  FACT.

Harris, running on Biden policy, lost 10 million votes or so from 2020.  FACT

Trum won ALL swing states.

If you can show those are not facts, on your own, bringing your own facts, I will tae a week off.  If you don't, don't ask ANYONE to post the popular vote again.

If you don't, don't ask ANYONE to post the popular vote again.

Under which particular very special rule of engagement? 

 

Sorry, you lose.  That is not debunking anything posted under the challenge.

There are no special rules, Lil Richard. That is the challenge.  See, now, you are going to divert, pull your hair light, lie and reframe because you know you can't and like most in your life you are not man enough to admit it.  And yes, I would say within arms length.  And you won't do **** unless I swing at you.
 

*Huey » 01 Feb 2025, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 3:35 pm

I am not running.  You are.  There is nothing you can bring that refutes the facts I posted.  I am not here to do your work. You lose.

Sorry, you lose.  That is not debunking anything posted under the challenge.

There are no special rules, Lil Richard. That is the challenge.  See, now, you are going to divert, pull your hair light, lie and reframe because you know you can't and like most in your life you are not man enough to admit it.  And yes, I would say within arms length.  And you won't do **** unless I swing at you.

Argue with the record.

Bring you current with your limitations in less than 30 seconds.

Which is why you huddled in Braintree. 

Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2025, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 3:38 pm

*Huey » 01 Feb 2025, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 3:35 pm

I am not running.  You are.  There is nothing you can bring that refutes the facts I posted.  I am not here to do your work. You lose.

Sorry, you lose.  That is not debunking anything posted under the challenge.

There are no special rules, Lil Richard. That is the challenge.  See, now, you are going to divert, pull your hair light, lie and reframe because you know you can't and like most in your life you are not man enough to admit it.  And yes, I would say within arms length.  And you won't do **** unless I swing at you.

Argue with the record.

Bring you current with your limitations in less than 30 seconds.

Which is why you huddled in Braintree. 

 

Let me remind you of the facts.  Acknowledge those are the facts.  This is not about your lies about Boston.  You lose.

*Huey » 01 Feb 2025, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 3:03 pm

Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2025, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 2:57 pm

Post the popular vote totals...

Already been done for you and you acknowledged the dems lost roughly 10 million votes under the Biden/Harris regime.

Let's see what trump did:

312 electoral votes.

Won the popular vote with your people losing 10 million from 2020.

Won ALL swing states.

Made games in all most all demographics in all states.

Great job that 13 did. Please, keep posting that.

 

 

Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2025, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 7:59 am

what would induce domestic producers to forgo the opportunity to raise prices under the tariff "umbrella"?

Demand elasticity

I don't buy the "cost will be passed onto the consumer" narrative. An overall reduction in trade between the two parties (which is deflationary) is more likely.

After Trump imposed his soybean export tariffs in 2018, directed to China, China just switched to a new supplier (Brazil). To this day most small soybean farmers in America have not recovered. (Big Ag benefitted from billions more in subsidies)

There's a Canadian economist who recently wrote for the WSJ that Trump's tariffs would cause a deflationary shock for Canada, since Canada is so reliant on trade with the U, while the US has more options.
 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2025, 7:54 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 7:54 am

It's called Comparative Advantage..it is a fundamental economic concept. 

Absent that, and fractional reserve banking, you'd be wearing  burlap and eating silage.

This anal-ysis ^ brought to you by a cretin that cannot determine gender without donning a lab coat and administering multiphasic personality inventories.    
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2025, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 7:59 am

what would induce domestic producers to forgo the opportunity to raise prices under the tariff "umbrella"?

NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

​​​​​​​https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif


 

Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2025, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 8:26 am

What do you believe finances construction, *******?

NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif


​​​​​​​

Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2025, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 8:41 am

What happens when you run out of varmint, Jethro?

NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif


​​​​​​​

Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2025, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 10:44 am

There's good reason why I didn't ask you.

NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Feb 2025, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

01 Feb 2025, 10:59 am

Show me where the "populace" does so.

NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif


​​​​​​​