:rofl:
You mean the one who teaches law at George Washington University Law School?
You appear to have forgotten that there is nothing in your empty wop skull you need to share.Zeets2 » 07 Feb 2025, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑ Once again, you'd rather look like an uninformed dope instead of admitting what great work is being done by the Trump team to cut wasteful and corrupt spending!
Here's a short list for you, dickhead!
Tell us which items that stupid libs like you want to continue funding, OK?:
Yea...I mean that fruit.ROG62 » 07 Feb 2025, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑ You mean the one who teaches law at George Washington University Law School?
or the nationally recognized legal scholar who has written extensively in areas ranging from constitutional law to legal theory to tort law. He has written over three dozen academic articles that have appeared in a variety of leading law journals at Cornell, Duke, Georgetown, Harvard, Northwestern, University of Chicago, and other schools. He is the author of The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage, which will be released in June 2024 by Simon & Schuster (available now for pre-orders). After a stint at Tulane Law School, Professor Turley joined the George Washington faculty in 1990 and, in 1998, was given the prestigious Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law, the youngest chaired professor in the school’s history. In 2024, a G.W. alum endowed a fellowship after him, “The Professor Jonathan Turley Public Interest and Public Service Summer Fellowship.”In addition to his extensive publications, Professor Turley has served as counsel in some of the most notable cases in the last two decades including the representation of whistleblowers, military personnel, judges, members of Congress, and a wide range of other clients. He is also one of the few attorneys to successfully challenge both a federal and a state law — leading to courts striking down the federal Elizabeth Morgan law as well as the state criminalization of cohabitation.
weep, brown..
RebelGator » 07 Feb 2025, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑ Is two a majority.....you're math challenged, lib picker.
HarperLee » 07 Feb 2025, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑ Since you quote the Washington Post all the time....
Did they endorse Harris?
(Bet you were waiting for the $25k to buy your first home)
Apparently not...Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2025, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, please...
If you're before A judge, ONE is a "majority"..
Cretin.
FIFY, numbnuts...Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2025, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑ You voted for the rapist felon who married two illegals and may have sired several ugly anchor babies...
Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2025, 6:56 am » wrote: ↑ “It has become ever more apparent that, to our president, the rule of law is but an impediment to his policy goals. The rule of law is, according to him, something to navigate around or simply ignore, whether that be for political or personal gain,” Coughenour said. “Nevertheless, in this courtroom, and under my watch, the rule of law is a bright beacon which I intend to follow.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigrat ... tizenship/
You've noticed that too, Your Honor?
Do what Free Ride, Slammin' Sammy and C'mon Aileen do...
Rewrite it to accommodate Sweet Donnie...
I didn't post "the list", ****...Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2025, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑![]()
The one Zeet just posted.....after Rog posted it yesterday?
You're all idiots...
Pist something specific and explain why it is "waste"...
https://jonathanturley.org/about/Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2025, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑ Yea...I mean that fruit.
His record since Clinton has been TERRIBLE.
I don't care what Jonathan has to say about himself.
of course you don't...now run...Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2025, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑ I don't care what Jonathan has to say about himself.
Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2025, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑ I'm to answer my own question...
Why don't you pull out the item with which you are most impressed...
I answered your question, Lazy Askholio.I'm to answer my own question...
So then why are you so unable to point out the wasteful line items that Musk has uncovered for the country to see?Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2025, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑ You appear to have forgotten that there is nothing in your empty wop skull you need to share.
Zeets2 » 07 Feb 2025, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑ So then why are you so unable to point out the wasteful line items that Musk has uncovered for the country to see?
Why don't you explain why it is that we SHOULD be funding things like LGBT activism and sex change surgery in Guatemala, the Cuban 'media ecosystem', or homosexuality in South Africa?
Is it nothing more than one of those countries is where you want to go to get your own free sex change surgery, sissyboi?
+1*Huey » 07 Feb 2025, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑ 2 reason he can't. He is not here to debate. He is here to disrupt. He acts as if he has been bullied and told what to do most of his life. The other is he has not been told what to say about it yet.
Good point!*Huey » 07 Feb 2025, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑ 2 reason he can't. He is not here to debate. He is here to disrupt. He acts as if he has been bullied and told what to do most of his life. The other is he has not been told what to say about it yet.
Try again, DICKBREATH!!Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2025, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑![]()
There's not a thing you "know" worth sharing, Groomer...