Hey ****, the US exports more than $175 BILLION in agricultural products. Saving that $2 BILLION in USAID waste will not affect exports at all. Maybe food prices will come down in the US.Squatchman » 09 Feb 2025, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑ Cutting USAID is another nail in the coffin for American farmers that voted for him.
Serves them right. Hope they lose everything and have to live on the streets.
What is going to kill farmers is it corporatization. Big corporations forcing small mom and pop farmers out of business. This has been the pattern for many years. Hopefully Trump and Musk will put a stop to it.Buffalo » 09 Feb 2025, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑Hey ****, the US exports more than $175 BILLION in agricultural products. Saving that $2 BILLION in USAID waste will not affect exports at all. Maybe food prices will come down in the US.Squatchman » 09 Feb 2025, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑ Cutting USAID is another nail in the coffin for American farmers that voted for him.
Serves them right. Hope they lose everything and have to live on the streets.
YOU are a **** idiot!!! Don't you know that?
That's why you need line item veto's....get rid of the tranny *** **** that you enjoy, and pass the stuff that helps real Americans.Squatchman » 09 Feb 2025, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑ Cutting USAID is another nail in the coffin for American farmers that voted for him.
Serves them right. Hope they lose everything and have to live on the streets.
Squatchman » 09 Feb 2025, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑ Except proof the election was stolen
That little fact curb stomps anything your "real journalist" opines.
Blackvegetable » 08 Feb 2025, 6:06 pm » wrote: ↑ C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014.
Still no proof snowflake.*Beekeeper » 09 Feb 2025, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ WHEN the ones doing the INVESTIGATIONS are the SAME ONES WHO STOLEN THE ELECTION, you might not have "proof", but instead a TOTAL COVERUP of FACTS AND EVIDENCE!!
Sucks huh, that your side didn't get that vote count in 2024, and yet TRUMP DID!! Imagine that. And pray tell, why was that??
BECAUSE, we knew your tactics, knew your modis operandi and put in place COUNTLESS observers, attorneys and people WATCHING YOUR ASSES to assure you COULDN'T CHEAT!! Add to that, WE GOT LAWS PASSED that also made things just that much tougher for DUMS to cheat in this one.
Sucks even more, huh, that your side was CURB STOMPED in the HOUSE, SENATE, and PRESIDENCY, huh?? I'll be that has you **** YOURSELF DAILY!!
Squatchman » 09 Feb 2025, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ Still no proof snowflake.
Sucks you can't provide any.
Must burn too.
Squatchman » 09 Feb 2025, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ Still no proof snowflake.
Sucks you can't provide any.
Must burn too.
Squatchman » 09 Feb 2025, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ Still no proof snowflake.
Sucks you can't provide any.
Must burn too.
Blackvegetable » 08 Feb 2025, 6:06 pm » wrote: ↑ C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014.
Only blind, deaf, and dumb liberals refuse to accept the many ways Democrats used to rig the system.
The 5th Circuit Agrees That Federal Officials Unconstitutionally 'Coerced' or 'Encouraged' Online Censorship
The appeals court narrowed a preliminary injunction against such meddling but confirmed the threat that it poses to freedom of speech.
Jacob Sullum | 9.11.2023
https://reason.com/2023/09/11/the-5th-c ... ensorship/
FBI Spent a Year Preparing Platforms to Censor Biden Story, Withheld Info on Laptop’s Authenticity
National Review by James Lynch
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... r-AA1te05E
Time to open your eyes and acknowledge the reality, dickhead!Testimony Reveals FBI Employees Who Warned Social Media Companies about Hack and Leak Operation Knew Hunter Biden Laptop Wasn’t Russian Disinformation
July 20, 2023 Press Release
WASHINGTON, D.C. – On July 17, 2023, the House Judiciary Committee and Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government conducted a transcribed interview of Laura Dehmlow, the Section Chief of the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF). During her transcribed interview, Dehmlow revealed that the same FBI personnel who were warning social media companies about a potential Russian “hack and leak” operation in the run-up to the 2020 election knew that the laptop belonging to Hunter Biden was not Russian disinformation. After the New York Post broke a story based on the contents of the laptop about Biden family influence peddling, the FBI made the institutional decision to refuse to answer direct questions from social media companies about the laptop’s authenticity—despite months of constant information sharing up to that time.
Where is that pesky laptop today?Zeets2 » 09 Feb 2025, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Only blind, deaf, and dumb liberals refuse to accept the many ways Democrats used to rig the system.
And if you still don't believe it, I DARE you to answer this question:
How is it that you can accept the fact that the fake news media were paid millions by Biden's to report that the Hunter laptop was Russian disinformation DESPITE THE FACT THAT THE FBI HAD THE LAPTOP IN THEIR POSSESSION FOR OVER A YEAR AND KNEW IT WAS AUTHENTIC?:
Time to open your eyes and acknowledge the reality, dickhead!
That is, unless of course you enjoy exposing your vast ignorance on the subject here.
Yes yes, we're all well aware of the fact that the entire deep state held firmly to the lie that the election wasn't tainted.Blackvegetable » 08 Feb 2025, 6:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Bill Barr says Donald Trump 'knew well he lost the election'
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-66388176
Shock Poll: 8 in 10 Think Biden Laptop Cover-Up Changed Election Most following the story want the AG to appoint a Special Counsel to investigate the laptop-related issues.
PAUL SPERRY August 24, 2022
On Oct. 19, 2020, more than 50 former U.S. intelligence officials, including CIA Director John Brennan, signed a public letter claiming the material published by the Post from Hunterʼs hard drive “has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation,” although none of them had seen it. Joe Biden cited their letter in the presidential debates to de ect questions about the laptop. “Terming the laptop ʻdisinformationʼ by the FBI, Intelligence Community, Congress, and the Biden campaign, along with Big Tech, impacted voters,” said Technometrica President Raghavan Mayur, whoʼs been recognized as the most accurate pollster in recent presidential elections. “A significant majority—78 percent—believe that access to the correct information could have been critical to their decision at the polls.” In fact, 47 percent said that knowing before the election that the laptop contents were real and not “disinformation” would have changed their voting decision—including more than two-thirds (71 percent) of Democrats.
Who is "we"?Zeets2 » 09 Feb 2025, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes yes, we're all well aware of the fact that the entire deep state held firmly to the lie that the election wasn't tainted.
So tell us, nitwit.
How do you account for the fact that 71% of Democrats would have changed their votes if they had not been told that the Hunter laptop was "Russian disinformation"?:
"We" are the Trump voters who already knew that the Hunter laptop was authentic, and that's added to the 47% (and 71% of them being Democrats) who state unequivocally that they would not have voted for Biden if not for the experts stating that the Hunter laptop was Russian disinformation.
Any more stupid questions on facts that you're incapable of admitting?8 in 10 Think Biden Laptop Cover-Up Changed Election Most following the story want the AG to appoint a Special Counsel to investigate the laptop-related issues.
PAUL SPERRY August 24, 2022
In fact, 47 percent said that knowing before the election that the laptop contents were real and not “disinformation” would have changed their voting decision—including more than two-thirds (71 percent) of Democrats.
No proof?
Paul Sperry?Zeets2 » 09 Feb 2025, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑ "We" are the Trump voters who already knew that the Hunter laptop was authentic, and that's added to the 47% (and 71% of them being Democrats) who state unequivocally that they would not have voted for Biden if not for the experts stating that the Hunter laptop was Russian disinformation.
Any more stupid questions on facts that you're incapable of admitting?
Oh, so I suppose the 71% of ignorant Democrats who were too dumb to recognize the fraud that Biden and his DOJ manufactured were just whining Democrats who couldn't stand the fact that they were so stupidly gullible to believe their dementia-riddled nominee was honest?Blackvegetable » 09 Feb 2025, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Paul Sperry?
NYPost?
That isn't vote fraud.
It's whining.