Liberal Forum

HarperLee » 10 Feb 2025, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2025, 10:54 am

He NEVER said he heard Trump say those things

Never confirmed it

He referenced it...

The Atlantic confirmed it was "anonymous"

And that's a fact.

Just because you talk about "pee tapes" it doesn't mean they exist.

Hole,

The FACT is that he is quoting Grifty.

This is clear to anyone not the product of a **** parochial school.grooming system.
 

Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2025, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2025, 9:46 am

Shut your priest sucker, Hole
"A person that thinks those who defend their country in uniform, or are shot down or seriously wounded in combat, or spend years being tortured as POWs are all ‘suckers’ because ‘there is nothing in it for them,'" Kelly said of Trump. "A person that did not want to be seen in the presence of military amputees because ‘it doesn’t look good for me.’ A person who demonstrated open contempt for a Gold Star family — for all Gold Star families — on TV during the 2016 campaign, and rants that our most precious heroes who gave their lives in America’s defense are ‘losers’ and wouldn’t visit their graves in France."

"and wouldn't visit their graves in France"

It's been confirmed by Trump's entire staff it had nothing to do with NOT wanting to go there
# 1.

And Kelly never confirmed he HEARD Trump say those things.
He's just repeating what The Atlantic ran with...

And the editor of the Atlantic has confirmed the story was based on an "anonymous source"
And that's the facts of this.
 

China, Russia, Iran and all the terrorists have nothing on Biden for trying to kill America. That mother **** needs to be put to death for treason.

"The sources in the Atlantic story should go on the record, if they want people to believe them over Trump. Otherwise, the president's supporters will largely disbelieve this story," CBS News reporter Kathryn Watson said. "We have an important election coming up. People should have all possible information plainly before voting for their commander-in-chief."

"Seriously, @JeffreyGoldberg piece is important and terrific reporting. Where the hell were these sources when it happened? Did I miss the part where any of those who heard the President attack war heroes quit in protest, or went on the record to tell us about this now?" The New Yorker staff writer Susan Glasser asked.

"You know what: It is time for these careerists to go ON the record. Enough," Washington Post writer and MSNBC contributor Jennifer Rubin tweeted.

Hey BV
Even the Washington Post said he should name his "anonymous sources"


In regards to his anonymous sources for the article, Goldberg said: “The formula is simple. What you do is you have to say, does the public’s right to know or need to know a particular piece of information outweigh the morally complicated and ambiguous qualities of anonymous sourcing. And so, most of us, most of the time, don’t rely on anonymous sourcing for most things because there are difficulties there.”

He added, “But in this climate, with information that we judge the voters to need, we are going to use anonymous sources because we think the public has a right to know

HarperLee » 10 Feb 2025, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2025, 11:12 am

"and wouldn't visit their graves in France"

It's been confirmed by Trump's entire staff it had nothing to do with NOT wanting to go there
# 1.

And Kelly never confirmed he HEARD Trump say those things.
He's just repeating what The Atlantic ran with...

And the editor of the Atlantic has confirmed the story was based on an "anonymous source"
And that's the facts of this.

Hole,

You are an illiterate imbecile.

Never presume to "explain" anything.
 

Make these illegals pick crops for free until they have earned enough to pay for their own deportation.

Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2025, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2025, 8:53 am

It is for you to assert and everyone else to prove.        

You're a **** idiot, Ghetto.    

It's for you Snowflakes  to scream and cry like a little ****** Bitches  that it never happened....[and without any proof].   Act like a man [instead of a  wuss] and prove it wrong...........   

You sure aren't taking your very humiliating defeat very well...............https://x.com/TheAlexStrenger/status/18 ... 1433178234
 
 

Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2025, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2025, 11:45 am

Hole,

You are an illiterate imbecile.

Never presume to "explain" anything.

In regards to his anonymous sources for the article, Goldberg said: “The formula is simple. What you do is you have to say, does the public’s right to know or need to know a particular piece of information outweigh the morally complicated and ambiguous qualities of anonymous sourcing. And so, most of us, most of the time, don’t rely on anonymous sourcing for most things because there are difficulties there.”He added, “But in this climate, with information that we judge the voters to need, we are going to use anonymous sources because we think the public has a right to know

HarperLee » 10 Feb 2025, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2025, 11:46 am

In regards to his anonymous sources for the article, Goldberg said: “The formula is simple. What you do is you have to say, does the public’s right to know or need to know a particular piece of information outweigh the morally complicated and ambiguous qualities of anonymous sourcing. And so, most of us, most of the time, don’t rely on anonymous sourcing for most things because there are difficulties there.”He added, “But in this climate, with information that we judge the voters to need, we are going to use anonymous sources because we think the public has a right to know

In regards to his anonymous sources for the article, Goldberg

This is about KELLY confirming the story years later.

 

HarperLee » 10 Feb 2025, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2025, 11:39 am

"The sources in the Atlantic story should go on the record, if they want people to believe them over Trump. Otherwise, the president's supporters will largely disbelieve this story," CBS News reporter Kathryn Watson said. "We have an important election coming up. People should have all possible information plainly before voting for their commander-in-chief."

"Seriously, @JeffreyGoldberg piece is important and terrific reporting. Where the hell were these sources when it happened? Did I miss the part where any of those who heard the President attack war heroes quit in protest, or went on the record to tell us about this now?" The New Yorker staff writer Susan Glasser asked.

"You know what: It is time for these careerists to go ON the record. Enough," Washington Post writer and MSNBC contributor Jennifer Rubin tweeted.

The sources in the Atlantic story should go on the record, if they want people to believe them over Trump

:rofl:  


 

Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2025, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2025, 12:28 pm

This is about KELLY confirming the story years later.

Kelly never confirmed he heard Trump say it

HarperLee » 10 Feb 2025, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2025, 1:01 pm

Kelly never confirmed he heard Trump say it

John Kelly confirms Trump privately disparaged U.S. service members and veterans


why do you, a brain dead hole, lie about this?

Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2025, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2025, 1:10 pm

John Kelly confirms Trump privately disparaged U.S. service members and veterans

why do you, a brain dead hole, lie about this?

Kelly never confirmed he heard Trump say "suckers and losers"...

He said Trump disparaged service members.
Never said he heard "suckers and losers".


 

HarperLee » 10 Feb 2025, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2025, 1:12 pm

Kelly never confirmed he heard Trump say "suckers and losers"...

He said Trump disparaged service members.
Never said he heard "suckers and losers".

Explain why the terms are in quotation marks, Hole.



**** idiot.
 

Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2025, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2025, 1:10 pm

John Kelly confirms Trump privately disparaged U.S. service members and veterans

why do you, a brain dead hole, lie about this?

  Donvict is afraid of real men.
Men that would sacrifice everything for their country.
Something he's never been or ever will be.
His inner cadet bone spurs cowardice shows itself every day.
 

Biden and Kelly are cowards and liars

Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2025, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2025, 11:45 am

Hole,

You are an illiterate imbecile.

Never presume to "explain" anything.

Lol, she's whipped your *** like a government mule.  

FJB » 10 Feb 2025, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2025, 1:31 pm

Biden and Kelly are cowards and liars

  Kelly **** better men than trump can ever aspire to.
​​Cadet bone spurs has already shown his cowardice by dodging the draft then calling service members losers and  suckers.
. The only thing 45 isn't afraid of is a Big Mac.
 

Squatchman » 10 Feb 2025, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2025, 2:39 pm

  Kelly **** better men than trump can ever aspire to.
​​Cadet bone spurs has already shown his cowardice by dodging the draft then calling service members losers and  suckers.
. The only thing 45 isn't afraid of is a Big Mac.

Why didn't Biden serve?