Liberal Forum

JohnnyYou » 36 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

36 minutes ago

Spheres.. 4D Venn Diagram intersections.. Ya just can't do it with folded paper and colored highlighters.  Tape is strictly forbidden.

Tape your mothers asshole shut so she can't talk anymore and you and the babblestain can **** each other in the mouth til you cease to exist daily in plain sight of the cockroaches dancing on your moms ***!

Johnny You » Today, 6:49 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:49 pm

All I am trying to say is the Origami is quite planar.  N,S,E,W don't exist in space.  Everything is in spheres.

sure you don't mean dimensions? 8 hemispheres divided by 7 axiom of tomorrow working 6 degrees of separation of 5 ancestral lineages with 5 generation gaps living at the sme time where the 5th arrival is always great great grandchildren replacing the entire species one at a time daily each with a unique set of chromosomes unlike any other bevore or after each person personally conceived by 2 parents.

Gee series parallel events each result spontaneously different 24/7 every heartbeat simultaneously going forward and everybody believes eternal life has to be anywhere else but the moment here.

Shame on the sole that understands it has always been now.

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 4:04 pm

That is a pretty sleazy answer, little boy.

It follows this exchange:

You "cannot think of a single reference supporting that frame of thought"???

You brought it up, fruitcake. YOU said YOU support him "raising living standards in that region."

I asked where in the Constitution he was empowered to use OUR money to that end, and you could not think of ANY reference supporting that frame of thought?

How about you just answer the **** question. WHERE DOES HE GET CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO - IN YOUR WORDS - "RAISE THE STANDARD OF LIVING IN THAT AREA"?

Stop with the panty dance and support your position, marshmallow.here
 

here I said: "cannot think of a single reference supporting that frame of thought"???  yeah, I said it....
.... and this too  ...."at this point, yes, I support Trump’s stance in that I feel ..., that he is aiming to raise living standards in that region".
Then you raised the Constitutional question, which is a good question, I see your point. The "raise the living standards in that region" could be only another money disaster.   ........just don't have a dog in that fight for what happens at the Gaza region......don't care...
.....and here you are.....How about you just answer the **** question. WHERE DOES HE GET CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO - IN YOUR WORDS - "RAISE THE STANDARD OF LIVING IN THAT AREA"?
....He doesn't have it.. ...
And like any politician.....the decision that they make have to be scrutinized....understandably....

Here you are....."Stop with the panty dance and support your position, marshmallow.here"
....oh yes, about my "position"......my position is that I voted my conscience when I voted for Trump. Is every decision he makes going to be good? Probably not. Is every decision I make going to be good? probably not either. .....I'm just going to see what he does and am certain he'll be great.  That's my position....
....

 

jefftec » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

here I said: "cannot think of a single reference supporting that frame of thought"???  yeah, I said it....
.... and this too  ...."at this point, yes, I support Trump’s stance in that I feel ..., that he is aiming to raise living standards in that region".

And then I asked where Trump was empowered by our Constitution to spend OUR treasure making OTHER countries better.

I'm still waiting for an answer.

jefftec » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

Then you raised the Constitutional question, which is a good question, I see your point. The "raise the living standards in that region" could be only another money disaster.   ........just don't have a dog in that fight for what happens at the Gaza region......don't care...

You JUST GOT THROUGH DEFENDING Trump spending our treasure there. If you don't care, tell the you of that post to shut the **** up and stop defending that ****.

jefftec » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

.....and here you are.....How about you just answer the **** question. WHERE DOES HE GET CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO - IN YOUR WORDS - "RAISE THE STANDARD OF LIVING IN THAT AREA"?
....He doesn't have it.. ...
And like any politician.....the decision that they make have to be scrutinized....understandably....

Here you are....."Stop with the panty dance and support your position, marshmallow.here"
....oh yes, about my "position"......my position is that I voted my conscience when I voted for Trump. Is every decision he makes going to be good? Probably not. Is every decision I make going to be good? probably not either. .....I'm just going to see what he does and am certain he'll be great.  That's my position....
....

The board is no better informed of your principles by any of this ^ than we were when you were defending then not defending then defending then not defending Trump spending our treasure in israel.

This includes those of us who understood the real purpose of my question in the first place - which was to demonstrate that you have none, than none guide you. We are no more informed than were were before - just reminded and reinforced.

You have at least become aware that there are Constitutional implications - ya just don't care. Because ya have no principles.

Cannonpointer » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

25 minutes ago

And then I asked where Trump was empowered by our Constitution to spend OUR treasure making OTHER countries better.

I'm still waiting for an answer.

You JUST GOT THROUGH DEFENDING Trump spending our treasure there. If you don't care, tell the you of that post to shut the **** up and stop defending that ****.

The board is no better informed of your principles by any of this ^ than we were when you were defending then not defending then defending then not defending Trump spending our treasure in israel.

This includes those of us who understood the real purpose of my question in the first place - which was to demonstrate that you have none, than none guide you. We are no more informed than were were before - just reminded and reinforced.

You have at least become aware that there are Constitutional implications - ya just don't care. Because ya have no principles.
 

Well damn....dude, really you:"And then I asked where Trump was empowered by our Constitution to spend OUR treasure making OTHER countries better."
CP, did you half-assed read my reply?....
" .....and here you are.....How about you just answer the **** question. WHERE DOES HE GET CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO - IN YOUR WORDS - "RAISE THE STANDARD OF LIVING IN THAT AREA"?
....He doesn't have it.. ...

"You JUST GOT THROUGH DEFENDING Trump spending our treasure there. If you don't care, tell the you of that post to shut the **** up and stop defending that ****."......
.....
nnnnnoooo, actually LightSpear, I was leaning toward your point of view.

"You have at least become aware that there are Constitutional implications - ya just don't care. Because ya have no principles."
....Just not caring if Gaza gets funding.....you made the rest of that sh/t up......
....
 

jefftec » Yesterday, 11:02 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:02 pm

Well damn....dude, really you:"And then I asked where Trump was empowered by our Constitution to spend OUR treasure making OTHER countries better."
CP, did you half-assed read my reply?....
" .....and here you are.....How about you just answer the **** question. WHERE DOES HE GET CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO - IN YOUR WORDS - "RAISE THE STANDARD OF LIVING IN THAT AREA"?
....He doesn't have it.. ...

"You JUST GOT THROUGH DEFENDING Trump spending our treasure there. If you don't care, tell the you of that post to shut the **** up and stop defending that ****."......
.....
nnnnnoooo, actually LightSpear, I was leaning toward your point of view.

"You have at least become aware that there are Constitutional implications - ya just don't care. Because ya have no principles."
....Just not caring if Gaza gets funding.....you made the rest of that sh/t up......
....

No, the rest of it was what I CONCLUDED - not what I "made up."

There's a difference. The fact that you pretend I "made it up" merely confirms that my conclusion was evidence based. 
 

Cannonpointer » Today, 12:51 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:51 am

No, the rest of it was what I CONCLUDED - not what I "made up."

There's a difference. The fact that you pretend I "made it up" merely confirms that my conclusion was evidence based.

You know @jefftec   is telling the truth.  Our wallets are getting thinner by the minute.  Trumpocalypse is worse than the Betty and Wilma Charge It Gang in Blue.

Trump is going to spend money like nobodies business and give the kleptomaniacal cabal all the tax breaks he can.

I think investing in Ukraine's sovereignty was a good idea.  Water over the damn at this point. We are going to have to pay to board up NATO and put up "Welcome to Poland" signs for Vladdy Daddy.  Trump is the Great Capitulator in the Oval Cockpit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1ZvPSpLxCg

JohnnyYou » Today, 2:55 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:55 am

Our wallets are getting thinner by the minute.  Trumpocalypse is worse than the Betty and Wilma Charge It Gang in Blue. He said the Mass Deportation "has no price tag"..  It looks like he figured out how much it is going to cost and Holman is in his office with his thumb up his ***...  Hopefully. We actually will need those workers if things actually do turn around.

Given the pay, benefits, and retirement, we won't EVER have trouble finding people for open positions. The civilian side of government mostly concerns itself with **** on Americans. We NEED a bureaucracy. Bureaucracies get things done. And we might not be thrilled with how the sausage is made, but we want that sausage.

That said, the last president to cut the CIVILIAN side of government - the bureaucracy - was Jimmy Carter. His good efforts were immediately negated when reagan took office. Reagan, after promising the precise opposite, grew the civilian side of government faster than any president except FDR. Ya gotta go all the way back to FDR to see an increase in the size and scope of government like reagan's - but FDR's growth was smart growth that created the historically unprecedented American middle class. W. Bush created entire new entitlements like medicare part d and the american dream act (which broke the economy).

Pruning is necessary in every garden - and it has been a long **** time since we saw a proper pruning. All we've seen for decades is bloat on top of bloat - and the spending porn that DOGE is exposing is the result.

JohnnyYou » Today, 2:55 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:55 am

Trump is going to spend money like nobodies business and give the kleptomaniacal cabal all the tax breaks he can.

And that is a departure from what? Tell us. That is a departure from what? What did the corporatocracy NOT get from the dypetard?

JohnnyYou » Today, 2:55 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:55 am

I think investing in Ukraine's sovereignty was a good idea.

Because you're stupid and ignorant - a bad combination.  We NEVER invested in that, you dummy. We OVERTHREW their government. How the **** is that "investing in their sovereignty"???

JohnnyYou » Today, 2:55 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:55 am

Water over the damn at this point. We are going to have to pay to board up NATO and put up "Welcome to Poland" signs for Vladdy Daddy.  Trump is the Great Capitulator in the Oval Cockpit.

Putin is keeping everything he took, and American bitches like you are going to take it and you are going to like it. Get used to it, cretin.

The nation of Russia was the victim of a proxy war that the DC swamp used Urkaine and Eurotards to wage against it. Vladimir Putin was the balls-out statesman who stood in the gap and made the critical difference with his leadership. He is the man of the 21st Century. He stood down the deep state and forced DC to wag its tail and be a good dog.

Yes, Trump is going to make the peace with Putin - and yes, like that little bitch Obama, he is going to live with Russia "re-acquiring lost provinces" (snicker). When Ukrainians allowed the swamp to steal their democracy and put them on a collision course with the historically NECESSARY nation to their east, they set themselves up for a naked ***-raping. You're watching it happen, and so am I. You're whining and sniveling about it - I'm **** laughing.

Don't be TOO concerned about Russia. They've awakened the sleeping giants in Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia. And then we have the roaring economies of Poland, France, and Germany. All is well - brave transgenders are guarding our eastern flank, pookie. If the ruskies get too uppity, they will click their high heels together and give those ruskies a sissy fight like they've never seen before.
 
 

Cannonpointer » Today, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:27 am

Given the pay, benefits, and retirement, we won't EVER have trouble finding people for open positions. The civilian side of government mostly concerns itself with **** on Americans. We NEED a bureaucracy. Bureaucracies get things done. And we might not be thrilled with how the sausage is made, but we want that sausage.

That said, the last president to cut the CIVILIAN side of government - the bureaucracy - was Jimmy Carter. His good efforts were immediately negated when reagan took office. Reagan, after promising the precise opposite, grew the civilian side of government faster than any president except FDR. Ya gotta go all the way back to FDR to see an increase in the size and scope of government like reagan's - but FDR's growth was smart growth that created the historically unprecedented American middle class. W. Bush created entire new entitlements like medicare part d and the american dream act (which broke the economy).

Pruning is necessary in every garden - and it has been a long **** time since we saw a proper pruning. All we've seen for decades is bloat on top of bloat - and the spending porn that DOGE is exposing is the result.

And that is a departure from what? Tell us. That is a departure from what? What did the corporatocracy NOT get from the dypetard?

Because you're stupid and ignorant - a bad combination.  We NEVER invested in that, you dummy. We OVERTHREW their government. How the **** is that "investing in their sovereignty"???

Putin is keeping everything he took, and American bitches like you are going to take it and you are going to like it. Get used to it, cretin.

The nation of Russia was the victim of a proxy war that the DC swamp used Urkaine and Eurotards to wage against it. Vladimir Putin was the balls-out statesman who stood in the gap and made the critical difference with his leadership. He is the man of the 21st Century. He stood down the deep state and forced DC to wag its tail and be a good dog.

Yes, Trump is going to make the peace with Putin - and yes, like that little bitch Obama, he is going to live with Russia "re-acquiring lost provinces" (snicker). When Ukrainians allowed the swamp to steal their democracy and put them on a collision course with the historically NECESSARY nation to their east, they set themselves up for a naked ***-raping. You're watching it happen, and so am I. You're whining and sniveling about it - I'm **** laughing.

Don't be TOO concerned about Russia. They've awakened the sleeping giants in Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia. And then we have the roaring economies of Poland, France, and Germany. All is well - brave transgenders are guarding our eastern flank, pookie. If the ruskies get too uppity, they will click their high heels together and give those ruskies a sissy fight like they've never seen before.

So who is going to pick the Strawberries?  Can we hook up a game controller to that?  Give 'em the Red Hat Neuralink and see what happens.. He he hehe  heheehh heeee  heeee

JohnnyYou » Yesterday, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 6:12 pm

Well 47 is a Prime Number divisible by only one and himself.

America is One in a Hole.  We suck at Golf..   Gov Wes Moore wants to rename the Chesapeake Bay the Gulf of Maryland.  The Creek to Baltimore is more accurate,

Go back to Africa ***.

JohnnyYou » Today, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:32 pm

So who is going to pick the Strawberries?

Your mother, when she ain't turning 10 dollar tricks in the alley.

murdock » 36 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

36 minutes ago

Your mother, when she ain't turning 10 dollar tricks in the alley.

Greatest porn music of all time.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZiRuj2_czzw

murdock » 44 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

44 minutes ago

Go back to Africa ***.

Slowest Gazelle or Fastest Lion

All Must Run

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBzuYNK95sM

JohnnyYou » 59 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

59 minutes ago

Slowest Gazelle or Fastest Lion

All Must Run

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBzuYNK95sM

Go back to Africa ***.

JohnnyYou » Today, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:44 pm

Greatest porn music of all time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZiRuj2_czzw

Go back to Africa ***.

 
 

JohnnyYou » Today, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:32 pm

So who is going to pick the Strawberries?  

Is that what the illegals in New York and Chicago are doing this winter, you predictable ***?

EVERY YEAR, visas are issued for fruit pickers. And every year, they go back to Mexico with pockets full of cash.

Illegals are not picking our strawberries, you DUMB son of a bitch. 
 

JohnnyYou » Today, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:32 pm

So who is going to pick the Strawberries?  Can we hook up a game controller to that?  Give 'em the Red Hat Neuralink and see what happens.. He he hehe  heheehh heeee  heeee

You pick them you lazy bastard. 

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 12:51 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:51 am

No, the rest of it was what I CONCLUDED - not what I "made up."

There's a difference. The fact that you pretend I "made it up" merely confirms that my conclusion was evidence based.

….you concluded about my “principles, for which you evidently have no clue about, obviously.

​​​​​​…..you’re just all over the place….
so much ado about nothing.

 

jefftec » Today, 6:36 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:36 pm

….you concluded about my “principles”, for which you evidently have no clue about, obviously.

​​​​​​…..you’re just all over the place….
so much ado about nothing.

Whining is much more your level, fruit. Defending your thesis? Not so much. 

Tell us where the Constitution empowers Trump to "make things better" in Gaza, with American treasure.
 

jefftec » Yesterday, 6:36 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 6:36 pm

….you concluded about my “principles”, for which you evidently have no clue about, obviously.

​​​​​​…..you’re just all over the place….
so much ado about nothing.

 
 

You only honor principals not genetic principles of adapting in plain sight daily living eternally separated by adapting to the moment living eternally separated now.

Whether it is persons, people, policies of laws ordering social comp[liance to never agreeing life is self evident time alive dawn to dusk intellectualy defined two separate days a week in every society here today midnight to noon tomorrow and end of the day noon to midnight now.