Liberal Forum

jefftec » 12 Feb 2025, 12:27 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2025, 12:27 pm

*1. ….guess you’ll have to surprised then.
.,..at this point, yes, I support Trump’s stance in that I feel (yes feel, if I’m allowed to in your intolerant world), that he is aiming to raise living standards in that region.

Do you believe he should follow the Constitution? Yes or no?

Which part of the Constitution empowers him to proceed with American tax dollars to "raise the living standards in that region"?

 

Cannonpointer » 12 Feb 2025, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2025, 12:31 pm

Do you believe he should follow the Constitution? Yes or no?

Which part of the Constitution empowers him to proceed with American tax dollars to "raise the living standards in that region"?

Yes
…..cannot think of a single reference supporting that frame of thought.



 

Cannonpointer » 12 Feb 2025, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2025, 11:36 am

Okay.

We won't talk about each other's moms.

Sounds good. But what will YOU talk about now?

Ok ok, you can talk about my mom, just don't mention her back hair.

jefftec » 12 Feb 2025, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2025, 12:36 pm

…..cannot think of a single reference supporting that frame of thought.

That is a pretty sleazy answer, little boy.

It follows this exchange:

Cannonpointer » 12 Feb 2025, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2025, 12:31 pm

jefftec » 12 Feb 2025, 12:27 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2025, 12:27 pm

.,..at this point, yes, I support Trump’s stance in that I feel ..., that he is aiming to raise living standards in that region.

Which part of the Constitution empowers him to proceed with American tax dollars to "raise the living standards in that region"?

You "cannot think of a single reference supporting that frame of thought"???

You brought it up, fruitcake. YOU said YOU support him "raising living standards in that region."

I asked where in the Constitution he was empowered to use OUR money to that end, and you could not think of ANY reference supporting that frame of thought?

How about you just answer the **** question. WHERE DOES HE GET CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO - IN YOUR WORDS - "RAISE THE STANDARD OF LIVING IN THAT AREA"?

Stop with the panty dance and support your position, marshmallow.

murdock » 12 Feb 2025, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2025, 1:19 pm

Ok ok, you can talk about my mom, just don't mention her back hair.

If you stopped with all the homosexual talk and all the mom talk, you'd have to scratch up SOMETHING else to talk about. 
 

Cannonpointer » 12 Feb 2025, 4:06 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2025, 4:06 pm

If you stopped with all the homosexual talk and all the mom talk, you'd have to scratch up SOMETHING else to talk about.

I only respond to the *** here in lingo they understand. Btw, stop talking about my mom's ***!

I saw her ***, I saw her monstrous ***! It had rash, a really hairy rash. On her ***, I saw her ***! I saw the monsters ***! 

It was raining in the city. A cold soaking rain that numbed you to the soul. Dampening everything except for the reality of what I was about to witness. Then I saw her, and it was awful. She was nekked. As in buck. She looked at me, and as she stood up I could see her nasty bush. It looked like it was undulating! Brrrr. Writhing even. I knew I was toast! She grabbed her fish port and screamed, "SUPER ******!" I looked at her, steeled myself for attack and said, "I'll have the soup!"
 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 12 Feb 2025, 4:06 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2025, 4:06 pm

If you stopped with all the homosexual talk and all the mom talk, you'd have to scratch up SOMETHING else to talk about.

 
 

Sumela » 12 Feb 2025, 4:21 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2025, 4:21 pm

Your cock port is certainly open wide today, smelly.

Cannonpointer » 12 Feb 2025, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2025, 12:31 pm

Do you believe he should follow the Constitution? Yes or no?

Which part of the Constitution empowers him to proceed with American tax dollars to "raise the living standards in that region"?

 

Instead of believing what social consensus believes the Constitution means, what do you understand about how it represents each ancestor alive?

"We hold these truths to be self evident all men are created equal.....". consider the pronoun men as mankind including every generation gap here that move into this country and become citizens of social order honoring eternal separation in plain sight.

This country will never be at peace with 340 million ancestors the rest of the 8.13 billion ancestors consider this country a threat to their old world traditions of ignoring now is eternity where chromosome results live equally adapting as occupying time today.

Oh wait! you don't accept life is eternally separated today either. Neither do Dems, Republicans, Independents, socialist, communists, and any other of the 1,064 reasons people in this species won't accept their natural time alive now, except me and one of my children. Wife and other child follow old world traditions character matters.

Cannonpointer » 11 Feb 2025, 8:15 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2025, 8:15 pm

Tell us a bit about your posting histroy.

Indeed - we have noticed that about you.

You are more self aware than I thought, answering my question in this way.

Lol, when you start lying like that, you lose.
 

Cannonpointer » 11 Feb 2025, 9:20 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2025, 9:20 pm

"Man, this little bitch cannot stop talking about gay ****. Everyday, more *** talk. Says a lot!"

"The *** can't help it. Every post is queer this queer that, *** this *** that! Is your asshole as loose as your mommies, punk?"

"Yup there he goes again. This freak cannot stop talking gay ****. Now that telling! Every post every comment!"

"Queers are all you talk about every day. Get help you sick bitch."

That's it ****, keep misrepresenting what I said. Lying bastard.

That God Damned Common Sense is going to kill a lot of people.

murdock » 12 Feb 2025, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2025, 4:17 pm

I only respond to the *** here in lingo they understand. Btw, stop talking about my mom's ***!

I saw her ***, I saw her monstrous ***! It had rash, a really hairy rash. On her ***, I saw her ***! I saw the monsters ***! 

It was raining in the city. A cold soaking rain that numbed you to the soul. Dampening everything except for the reality of what I was about to witness. Then I saw her, and it was awful. She was nekked. As in buck. She looked at me, and as she stood up I could see her nasty bush. It looked like it was undulating! Brrrr. Writhing even. I knew I was toast! She grabbed her fish port and screamed, "SUPER ******!" I looked at her, steeled myself for attack and said, "I'll have the soup!"

Holy Cow.. Three effing pargraphs.. Best Day to ya man or woman or whatever you want to be.  Maybe even a Person on Camera watching TV?
 

Cannonpointer » 12 Feb 2025, 4:06 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2025, 4:06 pm

If you stopped with all the homosexual talk and all the mom talk, you'd have to scratch up SOMETHING else to talk about.

Man.. you got through to him/her/it..   You got Murdock to crawl out of the hole they's head is in.
 He actually formulated paragraphs. Three of them.   I couldn't get as many words out the interdiscourse of  turdnado mouth.

31stArrival » 12 Feb 2025, 4:50 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2025, 4:50 pm

Instead of believing what social consensus believes the Constitution means, what do you understand about how it represents each ancestor alive?

 

I view it more from the perspective of the express powers it grants, rather than how it represents each ancestor alive. 

I've studied it a bit over the years, and I never really noticed that the Founders were interested in that Document representing each ancestor alive. Or representing ANYONE - living or dead, ancestral or modern. The Document's intent, and the intent of the founding generation, was to define and grant limited powers to offices of government. 

The people in the offices created, defined, and limited by the Constitution were the ones expected to represent each ancestor alive now. The Constitution itself, no - not its job. 
 

murdock » 12 Feb 2025, 4:53 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2025, 4:53 pm

Lol, when you start lying like that, you lose.

Tell us why you insist on playing character roles against type for the type of arguments made against 15 generations of living life now. 
 

Cannonpointer » 12 Feb 2025, 6:08 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2025, 6:08 pm

I view it more from the perspective of the express powers it grants, rather than how it represents each ancestor alive. 

I've studied it a bit over the years, and I never really noticed that the Founders were interested in that Document representing each ancestor alive. Or representing ANYONE - living or dead, ancestral or modern. The Document's intent, and the intent of the founding generation, was to define and grant limited powers to offices of government. 

The people in the offices created, defined, and limited by the Constitution were the ones expected to represent each ancestor alive now. The Constitution itself, no - not its job. 
 

Wow, parallel view with a great intellectual divide from there. Last word in your post, people have jobs, documents serve a purpose, not a reason.

murdock » 12 Feb 2025, 5:03 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2025, 5:03 pm

Cannonpointer » 11 Feb 2025, 9:20 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2025, 9:20 pm

"Man, this little bitch cannot stop talking about gay ****. Everyday, more *** talk. Says a lot!"

"The *** can't help it. Every post is queer this queer that, *** this *** that! Is your asshole as loose as your mommies, punk?"

"Yup there he goes again. This freak cannot stop talking gay ****. Now that telling! Every post every comment!"

"Queers are all you talk about every day. Get help you sick bitch."

That's it ****, keep misrepresenting what I said. Lying bastard.

I literally copy-paste your words, and you say they misrepresent you.

I think you need to fight that out among yourself, retard.

"Man, this little bitch cannot stop talking about gay ****. Everyday, more *** talk. Says a lot!"

"The *** can't help it. Every post is queer this queer that, *** this *** that! Is your asshole as loose as your mommies, punk?"

"Yup there he goes again. This freak cannot stop talking gay ****. Now that telling! Every post every comment!"

"Queers are all you talk about every day. Get help you sick bitch."

Like I said before, kid: If we take away *** talk and mama talk, you're silenced.

Cannonpointer » 12 Feb 2025, 6:18 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2025, 6:18 pm

I literally copy-paste your words, and you say they misrepresent you.

I think you need to fight that out among yourself, retard.

"Man, this little bitch cannot stop talking about gay ****. Everyday, more *** talk. Says a lot!"

"The *** can't help it. Every post is queer this queer that, *** this *** that! Is your asshole as loose as your mommies, punk?"

"Yup there he goes again. This freak cannot stop talking gay ****. Now that telling! Every post every comment!"

"Queers are all you talk about every day. Get help you sick bitch."

Like I said before, kid: If we take away *** talk and mama talk, you're silenced.

No liar, you misrepresent what I said. So **** off.