Liberal Forum

*Beekeeper » 16 Mar 2025, 4:12 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 4:12 pm

A LAWSUIT can make all the **** IDIOTIC CLAIMS it wants. The Speech and Debate clause HAS BEEN RULED AS ABSOLUTE by the SCOTUS, DICKSUCKER!!

AND as a FYI, her SPEECH was in regard to LEGISLATION being considered and her FLOOR SPEECH is protected, SUKM!! 

Article I, Section 6, Clause 1:
 The Senators and Representatives shall receive a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States. They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.

 The Supreme Court has described the Speech or Debate Clause as a provision that cannot be interpreted literally,1 but instead must be construed broadly in order to effectuate the Clause’s vital role in the constitutional separation of powers.2 Deceptively simple3 phrases—such as shall not be questioned, Speech or Debate, and even Senators and Representatives—have therefore been accorded meanings that extend well beyond their literal constructions.4 Arguably, this purpose-driven interpretive approach has given rise to some ambiguity in the precise scope of the protections afforded by the Clause. Despite uncertainty at the margins, it is well established that the Clause serves to secure the independence of the federal legislature by providing Members of Congress and their aides with immunity from criminal prosecutions or civil suits that stem from acts taken within the legislative sphere.5 As succinctly described by the Court, the Clause’s immunity from liability applies even though their conduct, if performed in other than legislative contexts, would in itself be unconstitutional or otherwise contrary to criminal or civil statutes.6 This general immunity principle forms the core of the protections afforded by the Clause.

Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 5:15 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 5:15 pm

Without any question,; the dumbest **** alive....not named @*HooooeyVagina

Blackvegetable » 11 Feb 2025, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2025, 10:44 am

Democrats were 'completely unhinged' during Pete Hegseth's confirmation hearing, Rep. Nancy Mace says

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6367119837112

Mace Takes to House Floor With Charges of Rape and Sexual Predation
The South Carolina Republican used her floor privileges to lodge shocking accusations against her former fiancé and three other men.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/10/us/p ... roid-share
In a stunningly graphic speech on the House floor that had little precedent, Ms. Mace said the men, whom she named and displayed photographs of on a placard where lawmakers more typically display charts and graphs on policy issues, were involved in the “premeditated, calculated exploitation of innocent women and girls in my district.”

 “You’ve booked yourself a one-way ticket to hell,” she said, referring to the men directly at one point in a speech that lasted close to an hour. “It is nonstop. There are no connections. So I and all of your victims can watch you rot into eternity.”

 On the floor of the House, Ms. Mace was protected by the speech and debate clause, even as she accused the men of repeatedly assaulting incapacitated women and filming it. The clause provides lawmakers immunity from criminal prosecutions or civil suits, such as for slander, when they are acting “within the legislative sphere.” Ms. Mace offered no evidence to support the accusations, although she said she had plenty of such material.

She "fell victim" to this......repeatedly?

I suspect that Nance may be trying to get ahead of something...

https://youtu.be/6WTdTwcmxyo?si=d2OWLNCrwk9bRAZS

Blackvegetable » 11 Feb 2025, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2025, 10:44 am

Democrats were 'completely unhinged' during Pete Hegseth's confirmation hearing, Rep. Nancy Mace says

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6367119837112

Mace Takes to House Floor With Charges of Rape and Sexual Predation
The South Carolina Republican used her floor privileges to lodge shocking accusations against her former fiancé and three other men.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/10/us/p ... roid-share
In a stunningly graphic speech on the House floor that had little precedent, Ms. Mace said the men, whom she named and displayed photographs of on a placard where lawmakers more typically display charts and graphs on policy issues, were involved in the “premeditated, calculated exploitation of innocent women and girls in my district.”

 “You’ve booked yourself a one-way ticket to hell,” she said, referring to the men directly at one point in a speech that lasted close to an hour. “It is nonstop. There are no connections. So I and all of your victims can watch you rot into eternity.”

 On the floor of the House, Ms. Mace was protected by the speech and debate clause, even as she accused the men of repeatedly assaulting incapacitated women and filming it. The clause provides lawmakers immunity from criminal prosecutions or civil suits, such as for slander, when they are acting “within the legislative sphere.” Ms. Mace offered no evidence to support the accusations, although she said she had plenty of such material.

She "fell victim" to this......repeatedly?

I suspect that Nance may be trying to get ahead of something...

https://youtu.be/6WTdTwcmxyo?si=d2OWLNCrwk9bRAZS

Blackvegetable » 05 Apr 2025, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑

05 Apr 2025, 8:43 am

Nance is a real piece of ****...

Charges dropped against trans advocate falsely accused of assault by Nancy Mace for giving her a firm handshake

https://www.advocate.com/crime/nancy-ma ... es-dropped

*Huey » 05 Apr 2025, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

05 Apr 2025, 11:14 am

Yawn.  You think anyone who disagrees with your believes is a real piece of ****

*Huey » 12 Feb 2025, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2025, 12:01 pm

Blackvegetable » 11 Feb 2025, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2025, 12:11 pm

Ask Nancy....apparently neither filing a police report nor a jury's finding meets her standard.

SC cops have been investigating Rep. Nancy Mace’s explosive sexual assault claims against ex-fiancé since 2023


An investigation into the explosive claims of sexual assault made by Rep. Nancy Mace against her former fiancé has been active and ongoing for more than a year, South Carolina state police confirmed. 

 The South Carolina Law Enforcement Division launched its probe into the congresswoman’s former beau, Patrick Byrant, on Dec. 14, 2023, on allegations of assault, harassment and voyeurism after being contacted by US Capitol Police, the agency said. 

 “Since that date, SLED has conducted multiple interviews, served multiple search warrants, and has a well-documented case file that will be available for release upon the conclusion of the case,” the agency said in a statement to The Post.


https://nypost.com/2025/02/11/us-news/p ... ince-2023/

 

Blackvegetable » 05 Apr 2025, 1:28 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Apr 2025, 1:28 pm

*Huey » 05 Apr 2025, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

05 Apr 2025, 11:14 am

Yawn.  You think anyone who disagrees with your believes is a real piece of ****

Did you read the OP?

 

*Huey » 05 Apr 2025, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Apr 2025, 1:33 pm

Yup, on 12 Feb, Many Booy.  Acknowledge I answered your idiotic question.

Blackvegetable » 05 Apr 2025, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Apr 2025, 1:35 pm

You didn't read the OP..

Your diversion was debunked.

*Huey » 05 Apr 2025, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Apr 2025, 1:38 pm

My post kicked your *** which I could do in real life but won't.  I was taught never to hit senior citizens, retards, and those who wear glasses.

I know you are a senior citizen.  You qualify on two counts.  Do you wear glasses?

Blackvegetable » 05 Apr 2025, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Apr 2025, 1:45 pm

Really?

What was the point of the OP?

*Huey » 05 Apr 2025, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Apr 2025, 1:49 pm

You tell m.  it is your OP.  Since you have to ask everyone a similar question it shows you are not a very good writer.

My post kicked your ***

which I could do in real life but won't.

Blackvegetable » 05 Apr 2025, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Apr 2025, 1:51 pm

*Huey » 05 Apr 2025, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Apr 2025, 1:49 pm

You tell m.  it is your OP.  Since you have to ask everyone a similar question it shows you are not a very good writer.

My post kicked your ***

Are those your words?

which I could do in real life but won't.

You can't...which is why you stopped 43 miles short.

 

*Huey » 05 Apr 2025, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Apr 2025, 1:38 pm

Blackvegetable » 05 Apr 2025, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Apr 2025, 1:35 pm

You didn't read the OP..

Your diversion was debunked.

My post kicked your *** which I could do in real life but won't.  I was taught never to hit senior citizens, retards, and those who wear glasses.

I know you are a senior citizen.  You qualify on two counts.  Do you wear glasses?

 

*Huey » 05 Apr 2025, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Apr 2025, 1:57 pm

That's how a man does it.   Aret hose my words? I didn't stop 43 miles short.  Let's be clear on a few things.  You are not the only one with training.  Next. up to about 5 years ago I would have torn you apart.  Next, I really would not hit a senior citizen, which you
are, a retard or a woman.  Now, you are tow of those three.  And finally, you now my name, my address, you have my pic stored, you have a map to my house.  When you get your balls back fro your ex wife come on down, Nancy boy.

I'm sorry.  I don't do partial quotes.  I'll show you how a man does it.  Even your father didn't think you were a man.

Blackvegetable » 05 Apr 2025, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Apr 2025, 2:26 pm

Tiny,

You are a yapping coward who runs from his own words while melting down.

You wouldn't have "torn" ANYONE "apart" 5 years ago, and certainly not El Tipo Malo....not even with cs gas..

*Huey » 06 Apr 2025, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2025, 9:24 am

I wouldn't have needed CS gas to handle a ****** like you.

Now, you know my name, where I live and have my pic.  When you reciprocate you can then call me a coward.  Nod, coward.

Blackvegetable » 06 Apr 2025, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2025, 9:30 am

Doesn't it sound silly to be telling a man 10 years your senior that "5 years ago I would have torn you apart"?

*Huey » 06 Apr 2025, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2025, 9:36 am

I also said in our primes.  I did not realize you are 69 or 70  years old.  Make that 15 to 20years ago.  Damn, as I have said before, you would win know because I was tought to never hit senior citizens, retards or women.  You qualify on two.  One is senior citizen.  Which is the other?

 I did not realize you are 69 or 70  years old

Make that 15 to 20years ago

Blackvegetable » 06 Apr 2025, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2025, 9:47 am

*Huey » 06 Apr 2025, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2025, 9:36 am

I also said in our primes.  I did not realize you are 69 or 70  years old.  Make that 15 to 20years ago.  Damn, as I have said before, you would win know because I was tought to never hit senior citizens, retards or women.  You qualify on two.  One is senior citizen.  Which is the other?

No, you didn't...you said "5 years ago"

 I did not realize you are 69 or 70  years old

68 in July.

Make that 15 to 20years ago

At which time I could have decapitated you with a spinning hook kick...

 

 

*Huey » 06 Apr 2025, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2025, 9:54 am

You wouldn't have done ****, ******.  Just like you didn't do **** in 22.

And no, you are not ten years older than me.