Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 06 Apr 2025, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2025, 9:55 am

Tiny,

In 22, you stopped 43 miles short.

Everything else is narrative.

No, I did not.  I stopped I Boston, around thirty miles away.  43 miles is something you did not know at the time and an excuse you did not come up with until last year.

What a sniveling lil ****** boy you are.  Dad would be so proud....I mean embarrassed that a sniveling, whining, lying lil ****** was his spawn.    
 

Blackvegetable » 06 Apr 2025, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2025, 9:47 am

No, you didn't...you said "5 years ago"

68 in July.

At which time I could have decapitated you with a spinning hook kick...

dang you are old 

*Huey » 06 Apr 2025, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2025, 9:58 am

No, I did not.  I stopped I Boston, around thirty miles away.  43 miles is something you did not know at the time and an excuse you did not come up with until last year.

What a sniveling lil ****** boy you are.  Dad would be so proud....I mean embarrassed that a sniveling, whining, lying lil ****** was his spawn.   

That's yet more narrative...

The facts are

You stopped in Braintree

Braintree is 43 miles short of the Ciudad de Tipo Malo 

Everything else is just **** you yap.

Blackvegetable » 06 Apr 2025, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2025, 10:03 am

That's yet more narrative...

The facts are

You stopped in Braintree

Braintree is 43 miles short of the Ciudad de Tipo Malo 

Everything else is just **** you yap.

There yet more narrative.

No one asked you to meet in Braintree nor were you told at the time where I was staying.  If your claim is any other than I asked you to meet in Boston you are lying.

Show this to your daughter to show what a ****** your are, ArmsLength.

No, you won't do ****, old man.  

Blackvegetable » 05 Apr 2025, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Apr 2025, 1:35 pm

You didn't read the OP..

Your diversion was debunked.

Yes, I read it.  No, you did not debunk ****, Old Man

*Huey » 06 Apr 2025, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2025, 10:08 am

Yes, I read it.  No, you did not debunk ****, Old Man

What is the point made in the OP you claim to have read?

*Huey » 06 Apr 2025, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2025, 10:07 am

There yet more narrative.

No one asked you to meet in Braintree nor were you told at the time where I was staying.  If your claim is any other than I asked you to meet in Boston you are lying.

Show this to your daughter to show what a ****** your are, ArmsLength.

No, you won't do ****, old man.

Just the verifiable facts....not your tinsel, Braintree. 
 

Blackvegetable » 06 Apr 2025, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2025, 10:10 am

Just the verifiable facts....not your tinsel, Braintree.

You have no facts to back up anything you claim

Blackvegetable » 06 Apr 2025, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2025, 10:10 am

Just the verifiable facts....not your tinsel, Braintree.

Last year I verified the first time you mentioned Braintree was, well last year.

So, you narrative is I asked you to meet me in Braintree? Get your daughter know.  I need to see if she is a lying lil ho like her father or if she has integrity.

And ArmsLength, you won't do ****.  

Blackvegetable » 06 Apr 2025, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2025, 10:09 am

What is the point made in the OP you claim to have read?

No questions, Askholio, until you prove you will consistently answer them.  

Blackvegetable » 11 Feb 2025, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2025, 10:44 am

Democrats were 'completely unhinged' during Pete Hegseth's confirmation hearing, Rep. Nancy Mace says

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6367119837112

Mace Takes to House Floor With Charges of Rape and Sexual Predation
The South Carolina Republican used her floor privileges to lodge shocking accusations against her former fiancé and three other men.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/10/us/p ... roid-share
In a stunningly graphic speech on the House floor that had little precedent, Ms. Mace said the men, whom she named and displayed photographs of on a placard where lawmakers more typically display charts and graphs on policy issues, were involved in the “premeditated, calculated exploitation of innocent women and girls in my district.”

 “You’ve booked yourself a one-way ticket to hell,” she said, referring to the men directly at one point in a speech that lasted close to an hour. “It is nonstop. There are no connections. So I and all of your victims can watch you rot into eternity.”

 On the floor of the House, Ms. Mace was protected by the speech and debate clause, even as she accused the men of repeatedly assaulting incapacitated women and filming it. The clause provides lawmakers immunity from criminal prosecutions or civil suits, such as for slander, when they are acting “within the legislative sphere.” Ms. Mace offered no evidence to support the accusations, although she said she had plenty of such material.

She "fell victim" to this......repeatedly?

I suspect that Nance may be trying to get ahead of something...

https://youtu.be/6WTdTwcmxyo?si=d2OWLNCrwk9bRAZS

https://newrepublic.com/post/195701/nan ... s-congress


Days after the president signed a bill focused on curbing revenge porn, Nancy Mace’s former political adviser has accused the South Carolina lawmaker of displaying nude photos taken by her ex-fiancé to extort two properties out of him.

 In an April deposition tied to a Charleston County civil case, veteran strategist Wesley Donehue said that Mace intended “to use all the information that she found as leverage to gain 100 percent ownership” of homes the former couple had in Washington and South Carolina’s Isle of Palms.

SERIOUSLY, PEOPLE....AM I FABULOUS OR WHAT?
 

Blackvegetable » 24 May 2025, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 7:14 am

https://newrepublic.com/post/195701/nan ... s-congress

Days after the president signed a bill focused on curbing revenge porn, Nancy Mace’s former political adviser has accused the South Carolina lawmaker of displaying nude photos taken by her ex-fiancé to extort two properties out of him.

 In an April deposition tied to a Charleston County civil case, veteran strategist Wesley Donehue said that Mace intended “to use all the information that she found as leverage to gain 100 percent ownership” of homes the former couple had in Washington and South Carolina’s Isle of Palms.

SERIOUSLY, PEOPLE....AM I FABULOUS OR WHAT?

"The first one is the one that everybody got to know during his vice presidency," Tapper says. "And the second one was kind of a non-functioning Joe Biden. ... And that non-functioning Biden would rear his head increasingly starting in, like, 2019, 2020. And then, as his term went on, more and more behind the scenes."The book describes a president who failed to recognize longtime political allies, lost his train of thought in important conversations and forgot important dates, including the death of his son, Beau: "We in the public would see some of it in front of the cameras ... but we had no idea how bad it was," Tapper says.


https://www.npr.org/2025/05/20/nx-s1-53 ... iginal-sin

Seriously...you are an idiot.

*Huey » 24 May 2025, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 7:18 am

"The first one is the one that everybody got to know during his vice presidency," Tapper says. "And the second one was kind of a non-functioning Joe Biden. ... And that non-functioning Biden would rear his head increasingly starting in, like, 2019, 2020. And then, as his term went on, more and more behind the scenes."The book describes a president who failed to recognize longtime political allies, lost his train of thought in important conversations and forgot important dates, including the death of his son, Beau: "We in the public would see some of it in front of the cameras ... but we had no idea how bad it was," Tapper says.

https://www.npr.org/2025/05/20/nx-s1-53 ... iginal-sin

Seriously...you are an idiot.

Why did you not cast a 3rd proud vote for the rapist felon 2XWorse than Buchanan?
 

Blackvegetable » 24 May 2025, 7:20 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 7:20 am

Why did you not cast a 3rd proud vote for the rapist felon 2XWorse than Buchanan?

Here is what you voted for, ******:

On the argument that the White House hid Biden's decline Some of the ways in which they helped hide his deterioration started off innocently enough. I mean, any staffer wants to make a president or a senator or a governor look as good as possible. And if he wants note cards, if he wants a teleprompter, if he wants to do events in the middle of the day instead of early in the morning or late at night — that's all perfectly understandable. But then all of those things became crutches and started really infiltrating his presidency in a serious way to the point that even cabinet meetings, even after the cameras left, were highly scripted.

You got the NPR link.  Donn't EVAH question my vote again.  YOU voted for a **** vegetable.  YOU are not a smart individual, sheeple.

*Huey » 24 May 2025, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 7:25 am

Here is what you voted for, ******:

On the argument that the White House hid Biden's decline Some of the ways in which they helped hide his deterioration started off innocently enough. I mean, any staffer wants to make a president or a senator or a governor look as good as possible. And if he wants note cards, if he wants a teleprompter, if he wants to do events in the middle of the day instead of early in the morning or late at night — that's all perfectly understandable. But then all of those things became crutches and started really infiltrating his presidency in a serious way to the point that even cabinet meetings, even after the cameras left, were highly scripted.

You got the NPR link.  Donn't EVAH question my vote again.  YOU voted for a **** vegetable.  YOU are not a smart individual, sheeple.

I voted for an Administration whose record far exceeds that of any administration for which you have ever cast a vote (your lies about 1 or 2 votes for Clinton notwithstanding).

I care about results.

You have no idea how they are measured....which is why you strap on the FOX feedbag, every day.
 

Blackvegetable » 24 May 2025, 7:29 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 7:29 am

I voted for an Administration whose record far exceeds that of any administration for which you have ever cast a vote (your lies about 1 or 2 votes for Clinton notwithstanding).

I care about results.

You have no idea how they are measured....which is why you strap on the FOX feedbag, every day.

Here is what you voted for in 2020 and were prepared to vote for in 24:

https://youtu.be/0vpIF65ISZU?si=hi4MnY030BEZvWzU

Again, another non FOX source.  You are a **** toady, ******.  Does your daughter understand how **** stupid you are or is she a **** toady like you, ******?

     

During a House Oversight Committee hearing on Tuesday, Mace showcased what she described as her “naked silhouette” from a video taken by Patrick Bryant without her consent. Mace said that in 2023, she discovered a trove of hidden-camera nude images of women that she claimed were taken by Byrant, also without those women’s consent. Mace displayed some of the images of the other women in the hearing, though she said she had gotten permission from them to do so.

ibid.

 To prove the naked silhouette is indeed her, Nance whipped out her silicone inflated dugs, demanding that everyone take a close look to confirm....then she flashed some gratuitous beaver...

“Nancy Mace made these claims only while standing in Congress, purportedly shielded by legal immunity,” the Charleston-area businessman continued. “If she believed them to be true and there was evidence to support her accusations, she would say them outside the chamber—away from her public role and protections and pursue them through proper legal channels. She has not done so, because she cannot.” 

And Donehue—per an 81-page deposition—appeared squarely against Mace’s record of events.

“I don’t believe a word that comes out of Nancy Mace’s mouth about anything,” said Donehue, who claimed to have known Mace for years. Donehue further painted Mace as an individual keen to play the “victim card” in order to get what she wants. “And that has nothing to do with this specific incident. I just believe that Nancy Mace will say and do anything for personal and political gain.”

From Donehue’s perspective, the photos on Bryant’s phone became an issue when Mace discovered he had dating apps downloaded, prompting concerns that the entrepreneur was cheating on her.

 “Nancy talks about her sex life in a way that I’ve never heard a client or a woman talk,” he continued. “It’s like every conversation would devolve into what’s going on in her sex life.”

ibid.

Onward, Christian Soldiers!
 
 

FJB » 06 Apr 2025, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2025, 10:11 am

You have no facts to back up anything you claim

Do evolving results mean anything to you? Comparing history to current events really doesn't allow for how evolving actually works forward by the moment living here one at a time.

Compare dawn to dusk per temperate zone between equator and icecaps to 24/7 longitudes everyone splits 7 days a week by some intellectual thing in Pacific ocean and Greenwich Prime meridian on a rotating planet 365 or 366 days a year of intellectual chronological time indexing of how people behaved every generation gap so far midnight to noon tomorrow and end of the day today lasts noon to midnight. Gee the missing link of big bang theory was never missing except in facts about how life evolves eternally separated in the moment here.

that kind of logistics keeps dawn to dusk yesterday never actually measured in intellectual relative time defining evolution of humanity so far.

BuckNaked » 11 Feb 2025, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2025, 10:45 am

She’s got **** issues

She won't  screw you?