Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
"I'm Guessing It Depends On Whose Kitty Is Being Gored - Eh, Nance?"
"I'm Guessing It Depends On Whose Kitty Is Being Gored - Eh, Nance?"
By Blackvegetable
11 Feb 2025 9:44 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
25 May 2025 9:21 am
I just read your post to Google and she said I should seek mental help ASAP31stArrival » 25 May 2025, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑ Do evolving results mean anything to you? Comparing history to current events really doesn't allow for how evolving actually works forward by the moment living here one at a time.
Compare dawn to dusk per temperate zone between equator and icecaps to 24/7 longitudes everyone splits 7 days a week by some intellectual thing in Pacific ocean and Greenwich Prime meridian on a rotating planet 365 or 366 days a year of intellectual chronological time indexing of how people behaved every generation gap so far midnight to noon tomorrow and end of the day today lasts noon to midnight. Gee the missing link of big bang theory was never missing except in facts about how life evolves eternally separated in the moment here.
that kind of logistics keeps dawn to dusk yesterday never actually measured in intellectual relative time defining evolution of humanity so far.
https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=rlvLW ... jloryRIOPB
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
Bump Caps Recommended..
Bump Caps Recommended..
25 May 2025 9:23 am
Guess why? AI is programmed by deniers(ancestors each generation lived so far) never accepting life as their sole time alive by chromosomes limiting an ancestor to eternally separated each heartbeat forward.Johnny You » 25 May 2025, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑ I just read your post to Google and she said I should seek mental help ASAP
You ever start watching to sci-fi AI stories about humans being the guardians of the galaxies? They all have the same theme/plotline regardless the main character is male or female.
25 May 2025 9:34 am
**** you ***. Lying bitch.
25 May 2025 9:39 am
3 feet of snow outside....and you're feeling birdy?
Ok...your call.
31 May 2025 7:20 am
Blackvegetable » 11 Feb 2025, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑ Democrats were 'completely unhinged' during Pete Hegseth's confirmation hearing, Rep. Nancy Mace says
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6367119837112
Mace Takes to House Floor With Charges of Rape and Sexual Predation
The South Carolina Republican used her floor privileges to lodge shocking accusations against her former fiancé and three other men.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/10/us/p ... roid-share
In a stunningly graphic speech on the House floor that had little precedent, Ms. Mace said the men, whom she named and displayed photographs of on a placard where lawmakers more typically display charts and graphs on policy issues, were involved in the “premeditated, calculated exploitation of innocent women and girls in my district.”
“You’ve booked yourself a one-way ticket to hell,” she said, referring to the men directly at one point in a speech that lasted close to an hour. “It is nonstop. There are no connections. So I and all of your victims can watch you rot into eternity.”
On the floor of the House, Ms. Mace was protected by the speech and debate clause, even as she accused the men of repeatedly assaulting incapacitated women and filming it. The clause provides lawmakers immunity from criminal prosecutions or civil suits, such as for slander, when they are acting “within the legislative sphere.” Ms. Mace offered no evidence to support the accusations, although she said she had plenty of such material.
She "fell victim" to this......repeatedly?
I suspect that Nance may be trying to get ahead of something...
https://youtu.be/6WTdTwcmxyo?si=d2OWLNCrwk9bRAZS
Of course.....cross earrings...
31 May 2025 7:33 am
“It would be a slap in the face to taxpayers across the country for me to spent [sic] time on their dime commenting on my bosses [sic] personal life,” Sydney Long, Mace’s communications director, writes in an email to WIRED.
https://www.wired.com/story/nancy-mace- ... -accounts/
Imagine a world were we shoot the Stupid.
https://www.wired.com/story/nancy-mace- ... -accounts/
Imagine a world were we shoot the Stupid.
31 May 2025 7:42 am
were, where, ware......it doesn't matter, right?
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
31 May 2025 7:52 am
Not enough.
31 May 2025 10:23 am
Blackvegetable » 31 May 2025, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑ “It would be a slap in the face to taxpayers across the country for me to spent [sic] time on their dime commenting on my bosses [sic] personal life,” Sydney Long, Mace’s communications director, writes in an email to WIRED.
https://www.wired.com/story/nancy-mace- ... -accounts/
Imagine a world were we shoot the Stupid.
I guess you would be FIRST IN LINE, huh, MORON!!
"were we shoot the stupid"!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
https://youtu.be/o6uLsW-bOTM?si=7w9Auoix85wRYx1kBlackvegetable » 11 Feb 2025, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑ Democrats were 'completely unhinged' during Pete Hegseth's confirmation hearing, Rep. Nancy Mace says
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6367119837112
Mace Takes to House Floor With Charges of Rape and Sexual Predation
The South Carolina Republican used her floor privileges to lodge shocking accusations against her former fiancé and three other men.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/10/us/p ... roid-share
In a stunningly graphic speech on the House floor that had little precedent, Ms. Mace said the men, whom she named and displayed photographs of on a placard where lawmakers more typically display charts and graphs on policy issues, were involved in the “premeditated, calculated exploitation of innocent women and girls in my district.”
“You’ve booked yourself a one-way ticket to hell,” she said, referring to the men directly at one point in a speech that lasted close to an hour. “It is nonstop. There are no connections. So I and all of your victims can watch you rot into eternity.”
On the floor of the House, Ms. Mace was protected by the speech and debate clause, even as she accused the men of repeatedly assaulting incapacitated women and filming it. The clause provides lawmakers immunity from criminal prosecutions or civil suits, such as for slander, when they are acting “within the legislative sphere.” Ms. Mace offered no evidence to support the accusations, although she said she had plenty of such material.
She "fell victim" to this......repeatedly?
I suspect that Nance may be trying to get ahead of something...
https://youtu.be/6WTdTwcmxyo?si=d2OWLNCrwk9bRAZS
Speaking of you being a nasty *** bitch, check this out:
Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
3 Mar 2026 10:06 am
go to 28:45
3 Mar 2026 10:16 am
**** your demands. You don't answer questions the first time, so nobody owes you anything. Here is proof:
Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
3 Mar 2026 10:34 am
You wear the context of your social personality in very stereotypical fashion it matches what rule of law defined you after birth..
Who is online
In total there are 5843 users online :: 12 registered, 15 bots, and 5816 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, Beekeeper, LowIQTrash, SouthernFried, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101
Bots: MicroMessenger, okhttp, DuckDuckBot, ADmantX, Bolt, proximic, YandexBot, CriteoBot, Applebot, facebookexternalhit, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, Googlebot, Baiduspider, bingbot