OH, I think you've suffered some greater outrages, given your professed incapacity to tell a man from a woman, tootie fruity.
HA!! I'm only explaining it to "you" as a PROXY for anyone else who might be reading (who MIGHT have more brains than you do) !Blackvegetable » Today, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑ Never presume to explain ANYTHING to me.
You're a **** moron.
You're lying.
The truth is that you're senile, credulous and stupid.ConservativeWave » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ HA!! I'm only explaining it to "you" as a PROXY for anyone else who might be reading (who MIGHT have more brains than you do) !
YOU? YOU are dead end... a BRAINLESS wonder... and I KNOW the TRUTH just comes in one ear, and out the other... without ANY cognitive processing in between..
Sorry Charlie... but THAT'S the TRUTH !!
YEA, Yea. yea.... Coming from someone with the brains of a turnip !
You proved my point precisely, *******. Yeah, after reading it, you had to concede that WHAT YOU QUOTED, what the article's title stated, was not what Trump actually said. And, still, you have not provided a copy of the transcript to prove what Trump said under oath. Still, you rely on what a journalist quoted in an article, where the title to the article was not what Trump testified to. You relied on misleading and false journalism - that's on you.Blackvegetable » 56 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You MAGAts cannot read..
Prosecutors asked why the value of Trump’s Aberdeen property increased by $245m between 2013 and 2014 when Trump appeared to have done little to the property. “Aberdeen is a very rich place. It’s an incredible piece of land, and it may be the greatest golf course ever built,” said Trump.
He downplayed the importance of the financial statements the judge has already ruled were fraudulent. Shown a financial statement from 2011, Trump pointed out a disclaimer. “We would call it a worthless statement clause,” he said. “They were not really documents that the banks paid much attention to.
I don't understand what it is with you idiots, objective facts and quotation marks.Skans » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You proved my point precisely, *******. Yeah, after reading it, you had to concede that WHAT YOU QUOTED, what the article's title stated, was not what Trump actually said. And, still, you have not provided a copy of the transcript to prove what Trump said under oath. Still, you rely on what a journalist quoted in an article, where the title to the article was not what Trump testified to. You relied on misleading and false journalism - that's on you.
You really should read the **** you cite to. Because, I am a very fast reader, I usually already know the truth, and I will annihilate you every time you try to pull off a half-*** stunt like that one, BV.
Furthermore, all of this is a deflection from the OP's question. Its a deflection because you, Democrat, have nothing to refute the wild and crazy Democrat corruption Trump's team is exposing every day.
You lied. You lost. I'm done.Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I don't understand what it is with you idiots, objective facts and quotation marks.
Shown a financial statement from 2011, Trump pointed out a disclaimer. “We would call it a worthless statement clause,” he said. “They were not really documents that the banks paid much attention to.
are the words in bold Grifty's?
Are they from his testimony?
You claimed that I am lying.
Don't crawl away, crying..
Of course your lying.Vegas » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You claimed that I am lying.
Thus, your job to prove I am lying.
Get to it. Chop! Chop!
Then prove it. Your assertions carry no currency.
No need.
That you believe such nonsense makes you a moron.Vegas » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ If I am an idiot, then you lost 6 times to one, so what does that make you?
Why do you always need to repeat yourself to narcissists? - YouTube
1. "prove it." To which I remind you that you made your claim first.
Moron.
Prove it.