Maybe one day we will have such a man...Cannonpointer » 21 Feb 2025, 10:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Statesmen are intolerable - hence the PDS from the tranny cadre.
Tremendous post...!Cannonpointer » 20 Feb 2025, 11:39 pm » wrote: ↑ It is preferable to the slow but steady march to civil war you fruitcakes are insisting on.
You think we were able to predict you **** would say that men get to see our daughters naked and play sports with them? Was THAT not bringing some major **** uncertainty? Was getting into a proxy war with a nuclear peer and then REFUSING TO TALK TO THEM like a mean high school girl not bringing some **** uncertainty? Was FORCEFULLY DEPOSING A PRESIDENT and then waiving off a primary and just pointing to the closest *** woman to the presidency not producing a smidgen of uncertainty?
How about stealing the 2020 election, using the covid "emergency" to change laws IMMEDIATELY in front of that election, and then calling anyone who had any questions about it a traitor? Or spending 4 years lying that a president had conspired with the Russians to win - IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT HE SANCTIONED THE RUSSIANS A HUNDRED TIMES MORE THAN OBAMA HAD? Was that not geared to create uncertainty? Was bullying us to say men are women and threatening our jobs if we didn't go along not creating some uncertainty? Did drag shows and school-provided pornography for small children not create uncertainty?
Did the FBI KNEELING IN THE STREET to people who were BURNING DOWN CITIES not produce a **** smidgen of uncertiainty on your end??? It DID ON OURS, mother ****. It DID on ours!!!
And what good IS certainty, if it leads to burning U.S. cities and mind-**** children and open borders and civil war?
YES. We prefer chaos. ANYTHING but complacent surrender to your race-baiting, misogyny, and child disturbing. ANYTHING is better than that.
No.
The tepid spew he was fed to deliver about Trump "creating uncertainty" rather aggravated me. If I had to produce a meme for how it made me feel, it would look like this:*GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Feb 2025, 11:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Tremendous post...!![]()
Too bad you wasted it on some totally brainwashed QUEER NATION LIBTARD who wouldn't dare read it past the first line for fear of suffering a massive, **** spewing head explosion.
Hmmm.Cannonpointer » 21 Feb 2025, 11:20 pm » wrote: ↑ No.
We will not get what we DON'T deserve. We're going to get what we DO deserve.
It won't be pretty.
Image what this world would look like today if all we had were "men" like BV and Johnny U to stand up to Hitler.Cannonpointer » 21 Feb 2025, 11:24 pm » wrote: ↑ The tepid spew he was fed to deliver about Trump "creating uncertainty" rather aggravated me. If I had to produce a meme for how it made me feel, it would look like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0ES5-1JrA4
, as firefighters, in farm work, and as hospital attendants in psychiatric hospitals.That all sounds not-so-vaguely communistic to me.*GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Feb 2025, 11:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Image what this world would look like today if all we had were "men" like BV and Johnny U to stand up to Hitler.
We had SOME men like them, but they still were expected to work for the war effort ......
Conscientious Objectors
As alternative service, COs worked in forestry, as human testers, as firefighters, in farm work, and as hospital attendants in psychiatric hospitals.
No matter what the job was, COs were always under the control of someone else, and had to work without pay. For many COs, their work was boring, depressing, and unrewarding in that the U.S. public did not appreciate their jobs.
Many COs were in forestry, mostly under the control of the U.S. Forestry Service. It was the COs’ job to build dams, levees, and reservoirs; dig ditches; clear channels; and sod gullies.
COs were also responsible for a large amount of trail-clearing in national parks.
Because a war was going on, farmers needed help to produce their products and asked Selective Service to allow COs to help them.
While most COs worked on dairy farms, others planted crops, picked vegetables, husked corn, dug potatoes, and pruned fruit trees, all for no pay. Veterans’ groups protested that farming was too easy an alternative to military service and, as a result, stricter rules were set. For example, COs could not work within 100 miles of a family member.
On the morning of the Pearl Harbor attack my Dad was shaving in his Cal Berkeley dorm, listening to the radio.Cannonpointer » 22 Feb 2025, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑ That all sounds not-so-vaguely communistic to me.
Muhammed Ali was a CO. Hell, I'D have been a CO. The Germans never did anything to me.
why don't you become such a male instead of waiting for one your we can follow.
I remember well the respect the wwii vets had. I grew up in the world they ran.*GHETTOBLASTER » 22 Feb 2025, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑ On the morning of the Pearl Harbor attack my Dad was shaving in his Cal Berkeley dorm, listening to the radio.
By the time he wiped off his face and made it to the Alameda AFEES station there was already lines of angry young white boys wrapped around the block eager to get back at the Japs.
Once the war was over, there was a sense of comraderie and respect that existed between those people that followed them through their post war professional lives too.
Times were a little bit different...High School phys ed programs included boxing and a lot of HSs had Rod & Gun Clubs that met before and after school.
At any rate...the COs of WW TWO were used as "HUMAN TESTERS"..so I thought you might get a kick out of hearing that.![]()
the world is run by a chain of command in each social interpretation of tomorrow, not by every ancestor is allowed an equal understanding of adapting in plain sight.Cannonpointer » 22 Feb 2025, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑ I remember well the respect the wwii vets had. I grew up in the world they ran.
I abhor governments enslaving citizens. That's empire ****.
Please explain why you don't believe that the 2020 election was stolen when you have all the proof you need that the FBI, the CIA, and Biden himself intentionally lied to the country repeatedly that the Hunter laptop was "Russian disinformation", and forced the media not to give the story any credibility, when the FBI already had possession of the laptop for over a year and had already authenticated it as genuine? Do you not believe the polls that prove that 17% of Biden voters would not have voted for him or chosen to stay home if the media wasn't forced by Biden's corrupt DOJ to lie about the laptop's authenticity?:JohnnyYou » 21 Feb 2025, 2:08 am » wrote: ↑ I will never accept the lie that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump. Joe Biden won the election. Y'all tried to prove that it was stolen and never did or at least the evidence was not clear to me on my feed. I don't take the time to read and try to understand Q Anon bullshyt. America's mayor totally disgraced himself. Perhaps he will redeem himself as a low rent Walmart Greeter.
17% of Biden Voters Would Not Have Voted for Him Had They Known Scandals Liberal Media Censored
LifeNews.com| Rich Noyes | Nov 24, 2020
To measure the true effect of the media’s censorship on the election, the Media Research Center asked The Polling Company to survey 1,750 Biden voters in seven swing states (AZ, GA, MI, NV, NC, PA and WI), 6 of which (all but NC) were called for Biden. We tested these voters’ knowledge of 8 news stories — all important topics that our ongoing analysis had shown the liberal news media had failed to cover properly. We found that a huge majority (82%) of Biden voters were unaware of at least one of these key items, with 5% saying they were unaware of all 8of the issues we tested. This lack of information proved crucial: One of every 6 Biden voters we surveyed (17%) said they would have abandoned the Democratic candidate had they known the facts about one or more of these news stories. A shift of this magnitude would have changed the outcome in all six of the swing states won by Biden, and Trump would have comfortably won a 2nd term as president.
Poll: 17% of Biden Voters Would Have Abandoned Him if They Knew About Stories the Media Censored
Western Journal By Johnathan Jones 11/24/20
As many as 17% of those who voted for Democrat Joe Biden might have chosen differently at the polls, had they been given fair media coverage of the candidates in the weeks leading up to the election.
Alleged election malfeasance aside, the establishment media, as expected, played a large part in interfering with the 2020 election, as was concluded by Newbusters.
Time to educate yourself to the reality, fool!79% say ‘truthful’ coverage of Hunter Biden’s laptop would have changed 2020 election
NY Post By Bruce Golding 8/26/22
Nearly 4 of 5 Americans who’ve been following the Hunter Biden laptop scandal believe that “truthful” coverage would have changed the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, according to a new poll.
A similar percentage also said they’re convinced that information on the computer is real, with just 11% saying they thought it was “created by Russia,” according to the survey conducted by the New Jersey-based Technometrica Institute of Policy and Politics.
On the subject of the 2020 election, 79% overall said it was “very” or “somewhat” likely that “a truthful interpretation of the laptop” would have resulted in the reelection of former President Donald Trump instead of the election of President Biden.
Wrong, it was a symbol of ingenuity.... where intellect triumphs over terrorism.Sumela » 21 Feb 2025, 11:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Hmmm.
Im off to bed sir.
Id like to add a note about when Bibi presented Trump with the 'golden pager' (terrorist) gift.
A symbol of terrorism that killed/maimed 100s of women and kids.
Trump replied """great job""".
Out of fear or respect? Either way creeeeeeepy as ****.
You weren't Jewish, you had that going for you.Cannonpointer » 22 Feb 2025, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑ That all sounds not-so-vaguely communistic to me.
Muhammed Ali was a CO. Hell, I'D have been a CO. The Germans never did anything to me.
It was an act of terrorism. Fun to watch the entire world hate Pissrael.RebelGator » 22 Feb 2025, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Wrong, it was a symbol of ingenuity.... where intellect triumphs over terrorism.
Whatever was between the germans and the jews was not my concern, sparky.
majority ruled by speculation falls into the power of suggestion to hate Israel from their chain of command typecast by context social order. After all your motto is character role playing matters more than simply adapting to the moment genetically eternally separated in plain sight daily here.Sumela » 22 Feb 2025, 7:58 pm » wrote: ↑ It was an act of terrorism. Fun to watch the entire world hate Pissrael.
ha ha ha ha ha Intellect minds have never out witted instinctive brains, just corrupted them socially every generation gap alive today with social interpretations of character matters more than understanding personal time alive now.RebelGator » 22 Feb 2025, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Wrong, it was a symbol of ingenuity.... where intellect triumphs over terrorism.
JohnnyYou » 20 Feb 2025, 5:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Yellowstone actually has arms to kill bears with gunsafes. The bathrooms aren't 24/7. There are gates and shyt for access to things.
Beyond your brain dead inquiry, Do you know how many foreign and domestic tourists visit the parks each year? If there is inadequate staff to help them do you think they might rethink that vacation? I waited an hour and a half to get to the Grand Canyon on my last visit. It would suck if you have to wait in line for two days. I guess you can sell very expensive tickets, make the parks as expensive as a Taylor Swift Concert and accept Trump Coin Only.
You all cannot link anything together, MAGA has no clue what effects Musk's policies will have as leader. I have no clue where all this shyt is taking us. The uncertainty the MAGAmaniacal Mango Man brings to Earth will be unmanageable. Because truly you folks want anarchy. That is not Freedom.