Cannonpointer » 39 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Trump can do almost anything. It's actually quite amazing.
I mean, did ANYONE believe he could manage to lose a dick measuring contest to a chinaman?![]()
![]()
![]()
Cannonpointer » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Yet another authoritative karen post from the biden sniffer.
Does this school girl EVER make an argument?
BOLIVIA'LL save us!
There is not ONE operating tungsten mine in the United States.murdock » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Lol, I never said it did, but smelly sue insinuates that we are short of of the metal, while it's being mined in lots of places here. Is that really that hard for you to comprehend?
He is right. We are producing zero tungsten. Zip. Zilch. Nada. None.murdock » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Here is what smelly sue said:
Just like MANY rare earths, minerals, metals.....China & Russia are LOADED with them.
MuriQUEER not so much.
False. It would prove that you inform yourself what you are running your head about BEFORE you run your head.
If you had WATCHED it, and thought it less than credible, you could have commented intelligently. Or at least in an informed manner, knowing what you were calling **** on. Instead, you commented WITHOUT watching, and you called **** on something that was never claimed. So you were just yammering nonsense.murdock » 33 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ That's just like watching a video episode of star trek don't prove we're out exploring the galaxy. Lots of people on the internet seem to believe just about anything they see. Strange.
Calling a name AFTER you've made a point is an ad hoc. WITHOUT making a point, it's just an ad hom.
Cannonpointer » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Calling a name AFTER you've made a point is an ad hoc. WITHOUT making a point, it's just an ad hom.
Cannonpointer » 35 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Yet another authoritative karen post from the biden sniffer.
Does this school girl EVER make an argument?
No it's being mined.Cannonpointer » 26 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ There is not ONE operating tungsten mine in the United States.
Not one.
Is that really that hard for you to comprehend?
He is right. We are producing zero tungsten. Zip. Zilch. Nada. None.
AMERICA HAS NO TUNGSTEN MINES IN OPERATION, AND HAS NOT HAD ANY FOR AT LEAST A DECADE.
Is that really that hard for you to comprehend?
Lol, watching videos and believing all of them only shows what a brain washed fool you are. Most videos prove nothing.Cannonpointer » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ False. It would prove that you inform yourself what you are running your head about BEFORE you run your head.
Just think about what that would do for your image - if you bothered to know what you are yammering about. It's LITERALLY the difference between other posters respecting you enough to read you, or just flying over your **** because they don't trust you for intelligent content.
If you had WATCHED it, and thought it less than credible, you could have commented intelligently. Or at least in an informed manner, knowing what you were calling **** on. Instead, you commented WITHOUT watching, and you called **** on something that was never claimed. So you were just yammering nonsense.
That is not a good look, right there. You CAN do better.
I never said you should have watched the video.murdock » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Lol, watching videos and believing all of them only shows what a brain washed fool you are. Most videos prove nothing.
Sumela » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑I dunno. Surely, they have their ***. And cute hotties who are clit lickers too.
China, like Russia, does not criminalize ***.DeezerShoove » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ No doubt. The fact that they don't get to demand to be "special" must be nice.
Gay people have been around within the global population forever.
The pride parades are a recent horrorshow trend that need rotten tomatoes thrown at...
Those people are ***. All gays don't necessarily like that grandstanding ****.
Cannonpointer » Today, 7:53 pm » wrote: ↑ I never said you should have watched the video.
I said you should have watched it if you were going to comment on it.
I planned to comment on it, so I watched it first. That is how I roll.
Do you, kid.
I watch a lot of stuff that I plan to shred. And sometimes, I end up not shredding it. Because it holds water, after all. But you do you. Just run your head without knowing what you're running your head about. It's a free country. In theory.
No, no - that's you, girl.murdock » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑LOL, SPEW BOY, SPEW!Cannonpointer » Today, 7:53 pm » wrote: ↑ I never said you should have watched the video.
I said you should have watched it if you were going to comment on it.
I planned to comment on it, so I watched it first. That is how I roll.
Do you, kid.
I watch a lot of stuff that I plan to shred. And sometimes, I end up not shredding it. Because it holds water, after all. But you do you. Just run your head without knowing what you're running your head about. It's a free country. In theory.
Cannonpointer » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ No, no - that's you, girl.
You ran your yap without bothering to acquaint yourself with the thing you were commenting on.
I actually WATCHED it - so that I would not be merely spewing, as you were.
The honest heart delights in correction. The little *** just gets defensive.