Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Elon Musk’s AI Bot Grok Finds Over Half of His Tweets ‘False or Misleading’, Disses Him as ‘A Mogul With A Microphone
Elon Musk’s AI Bot Grok Finds Over Half of His Tweets ‘False or Misleading’, Disses Him as ‘A Mogul With A Microphone
By Vegas
20 Feb 2025 1:57 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
20 Feb 2025 1:57 pm
Ouch! His own AI noted that almost half of his X posts were false. That's a little embarrassing. It's impossible to trust anyone in the government.
Elon Musk’s AI Bot Grok Finds Over Half of His Tweets ‘False or Misleading’, Disses Him as ‘A Mogul With A Microphone’
True (480 posts, 48%): These are statements that align with verifiable facts, like updates on Tesla production numbers, SpaceX launch schedules, or basic observations about technology that match known data. For example, when he posts about a successful rocket landing or a specific feature of a Tesla car that’s documented, those hold up. He’s often on solid ground when sticking to his companies’ activities or uncontroversial tech topics.
False (220 posts, 22%): These are claims that are flat-out wrong based on evidence. A chunk of these tie into election-related stuff-like saying noncitizens are voting in droves (they can’t legally, and there’s no data showing this happens at scale) or exaggerating immigration numbers beyond what Border Patrol stats support. Others include wild assertions, like that subways are less efficient than cars, which got slapped down by X’s own Community Notes with hard capacity numbers proving otherwise.
Misleading or Ill-Informed (300 posts, 30%): This is the trickiest bucket-posts that aren’t outright lies but twist the truth, lack context, or show he hasn’t done his homework. Think of posts where he amplifies a conspiracy theory (e.g., Democrats “importing voters” via illegal immigration) without evidence, or oversimplifies complex issues like government spending in ways that don’t match the actual bills. His takes on Al or climate sometimes veer into this zone too, where he’s speculative but presents it as fact.
What This Means For YouIf you’re wondering whether to trust Elon on X, it’s a mixed bag. About half his posts are reliable, especially on his turf-tech, cars, rockets. But the other half? You’re wading into a minefield. The 22% false posts are a red flag if accuracy matters to you; he’s been caught pushing election myths and exaggerations that don’t hold water. The 30% misleading ones are sneakier-they soundplausible but often fall apart under scrutiny. He’s got a habit of firing off hot takes or amplifying unverified stuff, especially on politics, which is where most of the trouble lies.For following him, it depends on what you want. If you’re into his visionary vibe and don’t mind filtering the noise, he’s entertaining and occasionally insightful. But if you’re looking for a source you can take at face value without double-checking, he’s not your guy. Studies-like one from the Center for Countering Digital Hate-have pegged his election-related false claims alone at over 2 billion views in 2024, so his reach amplifies the stakes. X’s own setup doesn’t always catch him either; Community Notes often skip his posts, leaving the mess unchecked.
What This MeansOn U.S. politics, Musk’s batting about one-third reliable, two-thirds shaky. The true stuff is mostly tied to his direct experience (business, Trump admin role), but he’s just as likely to post falsehoods or half-baked takes, especially on hot-button issues like elections and immigration. He’s got a pattern: when he’s riffing off X rumors or pushing a narrative (e.g., pro-Trump, anti-establishment), accuracy drops. Community Notes catch some of it, but not all-only about 10% of his false/misleading posts get flagged, per my count.Trustworthiness Takeaway
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
20 Feb 2025 2:53 pm
20 Feb 2025 3:49 pm
You LOSERS are so **** EASY to manipulate.
No really, you are.
Mediate?? No really, this is your source?? ANOTHER partisan hack piece that has pretty much ZERO merit.
Totally laughable at best and pure dog **** in reality.
No really, you are.
Mediate?? No really, this is your source?? ANOTHER partisan hack piece that has pretty much ZERO merit.
Totally laughable at best and pure dog **** in reality.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
20 Feb 2025 6:40 pm
I don't trust AI.Vegas » Today, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Ouch! His own AI noted that almost half of his X posts were false. That's a little embarrassing. It's impossible to trust anyone in the government.
Elon Musk’s AI Bot Grok Finds Over Half of His Tweets ‘False or Misleading’, Disses Him as ‘A Mogul With A Microphone’
Who programmed it?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
20 Feb 2025 8:20 pm
I asked the microsoft Chat Bot why he sounded so **** gay..was it because his programmers are gay...?
The Chat Bot got THO UPTHET with me, he ended the conversation just like that.....
20 Feb 2025 8:42 pm
AI, in its infancy, is not stupid enough to believe Elon.
20 Feb 2025 8:46 pm
If something sounds off, dig into it yourself—plenty of his posts don’t survive a Google search.”
Ibid.
:rofl:
"How sharper than a serpent's tooth it is to have a thankless child!"
Ibid.
:rofl:
"How sharper than a serpent's tooth it is to have a thankless child!"
20 Feb 2025 9:22 pm
20 Feb 2025 9:24 pm
20 Feb 2025 11:16 pm
Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 9:42 pm » wrote: ↑ AI, in its infancy, is not stupid enough to believe Elon.
AI only knows what’s it’s programmed to know
Yesterday 5:41 am
Maybe it programmed itself, I love the entertainment Musk provides, he does a great job of trolling depressed libs, but this is kind of scary when you think about it..
In memory of Pumpkins
Yesterday 7:37 am
Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 9:42 pm » wrote: ↑ AI, in its infancy, is not stupid enough to believe Elon.
I asked AI who was the biggest dickhead in America......you won!!....finally you are winning!
Yesterday 8:14 am
Yes, elon is a caution. A harbinger, if you ask me.Jantje_Smit » Today, 6:41 am » wrote: ↑ Maybe it programmed itself, I love the entertainment Musk provides, he does a great job of trolling depressed libs, but this is kind of scary when you think about it..
He is all the chickens, coming home to roost. They likely shouldn't have shot Trump in the face. Or lawfared him. He seems annoyed. He seems to be **** in their gravy bowl.
The left deeply desired burning cities and raped daughters - for justice, you understand. Well, let us give them their justice, I say. Burn it down. Burn the whole damned thing down. It isn't scary. It's glorious.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Yesterday 9:27 am
HA!! So saying that illegals are voting is a LIE?... when all the ACTUAL evidence shows that the REASON Democrats were pushing so hard to open the borders, and let the illegals in... was EXACTLY to BOLSTER their falling demographics, and KEEP their majority !! THIS from National Review... HARDLY a Conservative source:A Center for Immigration Studies report released today quantifies why Democrats support, or are indifferent to, open borders. The figures underlying the study may stun even the strongest proponents of border security.Vegas » Yesterday, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Ouch! His own AI noted that almost half of his X posts were false. That's a little embarrassing. It's impossible to trust anyone in the government.
Elon Musk’s AI Bot Grok Finds Over Half of His Tweets ‘False or Misleading’, Disses Him as ‘A Mogul With A Microphone’
The net effect of increases in both legal and illegal immigration in the 2020 Census shifted 17 House seats and 17 Electoral College votes, resulting in a net gain of 14 seats in Blue States — ten seats shifting from red states and four from battleground states. That Democratic net gain is greater than the respective electoral votes of all but ten states.
SO... I LIE??? I don't THINK so !!!
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/q ... n-borders/
Yesterday 9:28 am
The programming is different. It's not like they are programmed with instructions. They are programmed with algorithms that help them learn to program themselves. Yes, that could definitely be problematic. I have always advocated for regulations.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 9:49 am
ConservativeWave » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ HA!! So saying that illegals are voting is a LIE?... when all the ACTUAL evidence shows that the REASON Democrats were pushing so hard to open the borders, and let the illegals in... was EXACTLY to BOLSTER their falling demographics, and KEEP their majority !! THIS from National Review... HARDLY a Conservative source:
A Center for Immigration Studies report released today quantifies why Democrats support, or are indifferent to, open borders. The figures underlying the study may stun even the strongest proponents of border security.
The net effect of increases in both legal and illegal immigration in the 2020 Census shifted 17 House seats and 17 Electoral College votes, resulting in a net gain of 14 seats in Blue States... ten seats shifting from red states and four from battleground states. That Democratic net gain is greater than the respective electoral votes of all but ten states.
SO... YOU don't think that the Democrat pollsters and campaign people SAW THIS? I DISAGREE... they COMB ALL sorts of sources for EXACTLY this kind of information... "a LIE" ??? I don't THINK so !!! UNLESS your talking about the Democrats who want to keep THAT part hidden !!
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/q ... n-borders/
Clearly you don't know what 'almost half' means. It didn't say he was lying 100% of the time, it said almost half the time.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 9:52 am
*GHETTOBLASTER » Yesterday, 9:20 pm » wrote: ↑ I asked the microsoft Chat Bot why he sounded so **** gay..was it because his programmers are gay...?
The Chat Bot got THO UPTHET with me, he ended the conversation just like that.....
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 9:53 am
Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 9:46 pm » wrote: ↑ If something sounds off, dig into it yourself—plenty of his posts don’t survive a Google search.”
Ibid.
"How sharper than a serpent's tooth it is to have a thankless child!"
No thoughts, etc...copy/paste.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 10:38 am
Where's the "thought" in the OP?
Yesterday 10:42 am
Who is online
In total there are 2634 users online :: 18 registered, 17 bots, and 2599 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Zeets2, Buck Naked, Buffalo, ROG62, RebelGator, *GHETTO BLASTER, *Beekeeper, jerra b, murdock, Harper Lee, nefarious101, 31st Arrival, *Huey, Fuelman, PoliticalPopUp
Bots: LCC, Not, Dragonfly, Who.is Bot, DuckDuckBot, semantic-visions.com, YandexBot, proximic, Applebot, app.hypefactors.com, facebookexternalhit, ADmantX, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, curl/7, linkfluence.com, bingbot