https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png
That *** is so stupid, the judge threw him a bone, and he is dutifully gnawing on it like the insecure mongrel dog his mama raised.*Beekeeper » 26 Feb 2025, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png
CASE CLOSED, SUCKYSUCK BOY!!
I don't give 2 **** about what any JUDGE'S OPINION IS, the LAW SAYS HE IS NOT GUILTY!! PERIOD!!
Next you'll try to tell us that a JUDGE can overrule a NOT GUILTY verdict of a defendant simply because he "has the power to do that because it's his courtroom and he is all powerful and the last word"!!
YOU'RE A **** IDIOT!!
Stop there, Fondler..*Beekeeper » 26 Feb 2025, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑
I don't give 2 **** about what any JUDGE'S OPINION IS, the LAW SAYS HE IS NOT GUILTY!! PERIOD!!
To whom did Team Grifty direct its petition for relief from the amount awarded by the jury?
The one with jurisdiction.Blackvegetable » 26 Feb 2025, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑ To whom did Team Grifty direct its petition for relief from the amount awarded by the jury?
I don't condone your undying love and support for a pathological liar like Jean Carroll but I fully understand why you have those feelings of loyalty to her.Blackvegetable » 26 Feb 2025, 6:56 am » wrote: ↑ Why is Kaplan referred to as "the presiding judge"?

It's......not.....about.....you, Ruby...*GHETTOBLASTER » 26 Feb 2025, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑ I don't condone your undying love and support for a pathological liar like Jean Carroll but I fully understand why you have those feelings of loyalty to her.
****,Cannonpointer » 26 Feb 2025, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑ The one with jurisdiction.
In the matter of the verdict, the jury had jurisdiction.
You say you went to college?
It's about your mother and her filling up on horse dick.
I don't condone your undying love and support for a pathological liar like Jean Carroll but I fully understand why you have those feelings of loyalty to her.
Blackvegetable » 26 Feb 2025, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑ Stop there, Fondler..
It has never been, nor ever will be, about you.
Nod.
@ROG62*Beekeeper » 26 Feb 2025, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Funny **** right there, COCKYSUCKYBOY!!
But you are damn sure doing all you can to MAKE IT ABOUT YOU!!
Even down to trying to us a JUDGE'S OPINION to overrule a NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT!! Funny how in AMERICAN jurisprudence that a JURY has the FINAL WORD of guilt or innocence, huh, DICKYLICKYBOY??
And what did that JURY find in terms of Trump committing a RAPE?? NOT GUILTY and of the PREPONDERANCE of the evidence, a MUCH lower bar to cross for the Plaintiff!!
Now that REALLY has to bite your MORONIC ***, right, SUCKYDICKY BOY??
*GHETTOBLASTER » 26 Feb 2025, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't condone your undying love and support for a pathological liar like Jean Carroll but I fully understand why you have those feelings of loyalty to her.

Still no intelligent thoughts.
*GHETTOBLASTER » 26 Feb 2025, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Nobody expects you to post anything that is factual.
NOBADY EXPECTS YOU TO MAKE A POST THAT IS FACTUALBlackvegetable » 26 Feb 2025, 4:14 pm » wrote: ↑ which one is LESS "old painted *** with a dork knob"?

Run.*GHETTOBLASTER » 26 Feb 2025, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑ NOBADY EXPECTS YOU TO MAKE A POST THAT IS FACTUAL
If you ever did make a post that was 100% true we would consider that a novelty.
Yeah, nobody expects you to post anything that is 100% factual and you lived up to your reputation as a Mythomaniac once again.

And?*GHETTOBLASTER » 26 Feb 2025, 5:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, nobody expects you to post anything that is 100% factual and you lived up to your reputation as a Mythomaniac once again.
"In Moon's photo, the outer edge of Trump's mug seems to be in stark contrast to the rest of his face ... showing a color distinction between pale and what looks to be orange or tan. Getty Images has the same pic, though ... and it's not nearly as saturated as this."........Trump's 'Orange Face' Photo Appears Edited to Show Stark Contrast