You and I are looking through different lenses at this justice system. I see it as two-tiered and weaponized, You see it as dispassionate and respectable. You see the proper response to the aftermath of J6 a dusting of one's hands, with a muttered, "That ought to show them." I see the proper response as raised eyebrows, widened eyes, a dropped jaw and a clenched first - and hearty approval of the president's use of the pardon power.jerrab » 27 Feb 2025, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑ the justice system. where criminals get convicted for the crimes they commit. where people who smash windows receive punishment. if you have a problem wth this i guess you don't care if your car windows get smashed or your house windows.

RebelGator » 27 Feb 2025, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑ You supported terrorists killing Jews because they were evicted.....ring a bell?
The you are treasonous for complaining about it, I guess.jerrab » 27 Feb 2025, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑ apparently he did because he had presidential authority just like trump does now.
So what you're saying is no Democracy should enforce rules that incite the law breakers......I understand your position, now.jerrab » 27 Feb 2025, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑ israel knows that evicting people would cause terror attacks. but israel did not care. israel and america bear responsibility for 10/7 because america ignored the leahy law.
70 years of israel oppressing the palastianians and 70 years of terror attacks israel does care not about their own people.RebelGator » 27 Feb 2025, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑ So what you're saying is no Democracy should enforce rules that incite the law breakers......I understand your position, now.
Cannonpointer » 27 Feb 2025, 8:28 am » wrote: ↑ The you are treasonous for complaining about it, I guess.
Proud boy, much?
How many missile attacks have been launched against Israel in the same time period?jerrab » 27 Feb 2025, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑ 70 years of israel oppressing the palastianians and 70 years of terror attacks israel does care about their own people.
got your reservation for hotel trump gaza rivera yet?
RebelGator » 27 Feb 2025, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑ How many missile attacks have been launched against Israel in the same time period?
If you answer me honestly, I'll know you're sincere, if not.....I'll figure you for just another dishonest Democrat.
Your right to complain does not negate my right to inquire into your complaint, does it?jerrab » 27 Feb 2025, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑ no and no one should ever complain about presidential authority ever again, welcome to facist america. I thought americans had the right to complain but trump showed me the light.
https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/how-evicti ... n-violenceRebelGator » 27 Feb 2025, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑ How many missile attacks have been launched against Israel in the same time period?
If you answer me honestly, I'll know you're sincere, if not.....I'll figure you for just another dishonest Democrat.
Since you wouldn't answer, I'll give you a clue.....Hezbollah alone has fired over 10,000, without regard as to who or how many they kill.....and yet you cheer them on.RebelGator » 27 Feb 2025, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑ How many missile attacks have been launched against Israel in the same time period?
If you answer me honestly, I'll know you're sincere, if not.....I'll figure you for just another dishonest Democrat.
What does the law protect people defending their right to believe life isn't self evident time naturally limited to eternal separation of their reproduced body adapting equally alive in space now?
Cannonpointer » 27 Feb 2025, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑ You and I are looking through different lenses at this justice system. I see it as two-tiered and weaponized, You see it as dispassionate and respectable. You see the proper response to the aftermath of J6 a dusting of one's hands, with a muttered, "That ought to show them." I see the proper response as raised eyebrows, widened eyes, a dropped jaw and a clenched first - and hearty approval of the president's use of the pardon power.
We see J6 incident itself through equally discordant lenses. You saw a group of people who went LCD spontaneously and began committing heinous crimes to overthrow an honest election - the most honest and transparent election in the history of the nation, by all accounts that are not racist hitler proud boy treasonous accounts.
I saw a psy-op that was planned in advance, that was orchestrated using federal plants by the scores or perhaps hundreds to provoke and incite the crowd to those LCD actions, and that manipulated events in advance to cause an insufficient immediate police response. I have watched congressional investigations which demonstrated an unwillingness on behalf of corrupt DOJ officials to answer congressional subpoenas inquiring how many federal agents and paid provocateurs on retainer were salted within the crowd - or what their orders were. I have seen sworn testimony verifying that Pelosi - who had full jurisdiction as the shot-caller - repeatedly refused to have sufficient police on hand for the demonstration, which was dubbed "STOP THE STEAL" - a moniker indicative of the mood that might be expected within the throng. I have seen obvious federal agents whose actions to incite the crowd were caught on camera but who were not prosecuted for months or years until the hue and cry could not be stifled - and then their "prosecutions" were pro-forma exercises in leniency.
I know that the overwhelming majority of the - let's refer to them as party-goers - the overwhelming majority of the party goers were second amendment types. And yet not one gun was brandished by other than police. So the pretense that a plan existed to overthrow the government is - and I will use the scientific language here - radically homosexual.
I saw a psy op. You saw a mob. Naturally, we are going to disagree on what ought to have been done in response to two different things. If I had seen what you saw, or if you had seen what I saw, we might be on the same page. Instead, here I am, firmly in the heterosexual camp, and there you are, rubbing shoulders and paling around with...![]()
RebelGator » 27 Feb 2025, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑ Since you wouldn't answer, I'll give you a clue.....Hezbollah alone has fired over 10,000, without regard as to who or how many they kill.....and yet you cheer them on.
no I answered your questions no problem.Cannonpointer » 27 Feb 2025, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑ Your right to complain does not negate my right to inquire into your complaint, does it?
Your victim posing seems a tad defensive - half again TOO defensive to take your complaints seriously.
israel incites them on purpose. the evictions are not about breaking the law but about israel oppressing the palastistinians with the blessing of so called christians,RebelGator » 27 Feb 2025, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑ So what you're saying is no Democracy should enforce rules that incite the law breakers......I understand your position, now.
----------------------------------------------Cannonpointer » 27 Feb 2025, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑ You and I are looking through different lenses at this justice system. I see it as two-tiered and weaponized, You see it as dispassionate and respectable. You see the proper response to the aftermath of J6 a dusting of one's hands, with a muttered, "That ought to show them." I see the proper response as raised eyebrows, widened eyes, a dropped jaw and a clenched first - and hearty approval of the president's use of the pardon power.
We see J6 incident itself through equally discordant lenses. You saw a group of people who went LCD spontaneously and began committing heinous crimes to overthrow an honest election - the most honest and transparent election in the history of the nation, by all accounts that are not racist hitler proud boy treasonous accounts.
I saw a psy-op that was planned in advance, that was orchestrated using federal plants by the scores or perhaps hundreds to provoke and incite the crowd to those LCD actions, and that manipulated events in advance to cause an insufficient immediate police response. I have watched congressional investigations which demonstrated an unwillingness on behalf of corrupt DOJ officials to answer congressional subpoenas inquiring how many federal agents and paid provocateurs on retainer were salted within the crowd - or what their orders were. I have seen sworn testimony verifying that Pelosi - who had full jurisdiction as the shot-caller - repeatedly refused to have sufficient police on hand for the demonstration, which was dubbed "STOP THE STEAL" - a moniker indicative of the mood that might be expected within the throng. I have seen obvious federal agents whose actions to incite the crowd were caught on camera but who were not prosecuted for months or years until the hue and cry could not be stifled - and then their "prosecutions" were pro-forma exercises in leniency.
I know that the overwhelming majority of the - let's refer to them as party-goers - the overwhelming majority of the party goers were second amendment types. And yet not one gun was brandished by other than police. So the pretense that a plan existed to overthrow the government is - and I will use the scientific language here - radically homosexual.
I saw a psy op. You saw a mob. Naturally, we are going to disagree on what ought to have been done in response to two different things. If I had seen what you saw, or if you had seen what I saw, we might be on the same page. Instead, here I am, firmly in the heterosexual camp, and there you are, rubbing shoulders and paling around with...![]()
I watched the same behavior in a small college town in Ohio April 1970 until May 4th the same year.Cannonpointer » 27 Feb 2025, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑ You and I are looking through different lenses at this justice system. I see it as two-tiered and weaponized, You see it as dispassionate and respectable. You see the proper response to the aftermath of J6 a dusting of one's hands, with a muttered, "That ought to show them." I see the proper response as raised eyebrows, widened eyes, a dropped jaw and a clenched first - and hearty approval of the president's use of the pardon power.
We see J6 incident itself through equally discordant lenses. You saw a group of people who went LCD spontaneously and began committing heinous crimes to overthrow an honest election - the most honest and transparent election in the history of the nation, by all accounts that are not racist hitler proud boy treasonous accounts.
I saw a psy-op that was planned in advance, that was orchestrated using federal plants by the scores or perhaps hundreds to provoke and incite the crowd to those LCD actions, and that manipulated events in advance to cause an insufficient immediate police response. I have watched congressional investigations which demonstrated an unwillingness on behalf of corrupt DOJ officials to answer congressional subpoenas inquiring how many federal agents and paid provocateurs on retainer were salted within the crowd - or what their orders were. I have seen sworn testimony verifying that Pelosi - who had full jurisdiction as the shot-caller - repeatedly refused to have sufficient police on hand for the demonstration, which was dubbed "STOP THE STEAL" - a moniker indicative of the mood that might be expected within the throng. I have seen obvious federal agents whose actions to incite the crowd were caught on camera but who were not prosecuted for months or years until the hue and cry could not be stifled - and then their "prosecutions" were pro-forma exercises in leniency.
I know that the overwhelming majority of the - let's refer to them as party-goers - the overwhelming majority of the party goers were second amendment types. And yet not one gun was brandished by other than police. So the pretense that a plan existed to overthrow the government is - and I will use the scientific language here - radically homosexual.
I saw a psy op. You saw a mob. Naturally, we are going to disagree on what ought to have been done in response to two different things. If I had seen what you saw, or if you had seen what I saw, we might be on the same page. Instead, here I am, firmly in the heterosexual camp, and there you are, rubbing shoulders and paling around with...![]()
RebelGator » 27 Feb 2025, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑ Since you wouldn't answer, I'll give you a clue.....Hezbollah alone has fired over 10,000, without regard as to who or how many they kill.....and yet you cheer them on.
----------------------------------RebelGator » 27 Feb 2025, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑ Since you wouldn't answer, I'll give you a clue.....Hezbollah alone has fired over 10,000, without regard as to who or how many they kill.....and yet you cheer them on.