sound familiar?
By jerra b
24 Feb 2025 10:50 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
26 Feb 2025 8:09 pm
Cannonpointer » 26 Feb 2025, 6:25 pm » wrote: ↑ You're still ducking the question. How do you ignore my question, and ask another. Did you take coaching from beevee?
Why do you care about these feebs getting fired.
Who instructed you that their firing was bad and wrong and worth bemoaning on the interwebs?
they did their jobs and followed the law.
26 Feb 2025 9:21 pm
Are you personally acquainted with each of them?
If not, then someone told you that, and you believed it.
Which is fine. We do that all the time. But who was that person? Has that person told you other things that proved to be accurate? Is this a long trusted source - one that you have relied on for solid information in the past?
SOMEONE set you off. I'm just asking who that is. You are still not answering - you just responded with a fact claim. Where did you get that fact? I am confident that you do not simply assume facts. SOMEONE lined you out. Are you embarrassed to say who that someone was?
I can tell you, I am proud of my sources. I present them - regularly. I very often use media bias fact check to determine their leanings and credibility rankings. I am not saying that media bias fact check has the final word in MY opinions of sources - but I find them useful to establish the credibility of the sources I select to back my fact claims. If arguing with a leftist, I am likely to back my fact claims with a left leaning source of high credibility according to media bias fact check. If I am arguing with a conservative, I prefer to use CATO, National Review, Heritage - something right leaning to back my fact claims.
You see, neither you nor I know for a fact that these officers are bastions of corruption or integrity. We trust our sources and our intuition and our sense of how the world works. So we have sources. You have sources. I have sources. Everyone has sources.
And I have spent a lot of time, energy, finger motions, cajoling, word-smithing, and megs of gig and terabytes to get you to name yours. I find it interesting that you don't want to.
I am starting to suspect that you see me as the type of fella who will mock you and your sources mercilessly. And that hurts, bro. That just hurts.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
26 Feb 2025 9:35 pm
Cannonpointer » 26 Feb 2025, 10:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Are you personally acquainted with them?
If not, then someone told you that, and you believed it.
Who was that bad person? Had that person told you other things that proved to be accurate? Is this a long trusted source - one that you have relied on for solid information in the past?
SOMEONE set you off. I'm just asking who that is. You finally - I won't say answered - you finally addressed the question with a fact claim. Where did you get that fact? You do not simply assume facts, I am confident. SOMEONE lined you out. Are you embarrassed to say who that someone was?
I can tell you, I am proud of my sources. I present them - regularly. I very often use media bias fact check to determine their leanings and credibility rankings. I am not saying that media bias fact check has the final word in MY opinions of sources - but I find them useful to establish the credibility of the sources I select to back my fact claims. If arguing with a leftist, I am likely to back my fact claims with a left leaning source of high credibility according to media bias fact check. If I am arguing with a conservative, I prefer to use CATO, National Review, Heritage - something right leaning to back my fact claims.
You see, neither you nor I know for a fact that these officers are bastions of corruption or integrity. We trust our sources and our intuition and our sense of how the world works. So we have sources. You have sources. I have sources. Everyone has sources.
And I have spent a lot of time, energy, finger motions, cajoling, word-smithing, and megs of gig and terabytes to get you to name yours. I find it interesting that you don't want to.
I am starting to suspect that you see me as the type of fella who will mock you and your sources mercilessly. And that hurts, bro. That just hurts.
what j 6 r's were convicted of something they did not do?
26 Feb 2025 9:51 pm
Cannonpointer » 26 Feb 2025, 10:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Are you personally acquainted with them?
If not, then someone told you that, and you believed it.
Who was that bad person? Had that person told you other things that proved to be accurate? Is this a long trusted source - one that you have relied on for solid information in the past?
SOMEONE set you off. I'm just asking who that is. You finally - I won't say answered - you finally addressed the question with a fact claim. Where did you get that fact? You do not simply assume facts, I am confident. SOMEONE lined you out. Are you embarrassed to say who that someone was?
I can tell you, I am proud of my sources. I present them - regularly. I very often use media bias fact check to determine their leanings and credibility rankings. I am not saying that media bias fact check has the final word in MY opinions of sources - but I find them useful to establish the credibility of the sources I select to back my fact claims. If arguing with a leftist, I am likely to back my fact claims with a left leaning source of high credibility according to media bias fact check. If I am arguing with a conservative, I prefer to use CATO, National Review, Heritage - something right leaning to back my fact claims.
You see, neither you nor I know for a fact that these officers are bastions of corruption or integrity. We trust our sources and our intuition and our sense of how the world works. So we have sources. You have sources. I have sources. Everyone has sources.
And I have spent a lot of time, energy, finger motions, cajoling, word-smithing, and megs of gig and terabytes to get you to name yours. I find it interesting that you don't want to.
I am starting to suspect that you see me as the type of fella who will mock you and your sources mercilessly. And that hurts, bro. That just hurts.
why shouldn't it bother me that president of the united states bends the law to suit his own needs? why shouldn't it bother me that his supporters don't even care? what else are his supporters are going to allow him to do? loyalty to trump is the most impotant thing to them, surpasses everything, country included, and if one objects they are subject to ridicule.
26 Feb 2025 10:18 pm
You are still dancing around my question - and now you presume to demand answers?
If I give you a list of perfectly innocent people imprisoned - many of them for years, without trials, - what will change in your view of J6?
You are asking me to provide you with evidence. Tell me what that evidence would mean to you. If I can establish my claim, what will change?
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
26 Feb 2025 10:24 pm
Were you bothered when the "big guy" got ten percent of his kid's business interests in foreign countries - at least one of which was and is viewed as an adversary?jerrab » 26 Feb 2025, 10:51 pm » wrote: ↑ why shouldn't it bother me that president of the united states bends the law to suit his own needs? why shouldn't it bother me that his supporters don't even care? what else are his supporters are going to allow him to do? loyalty to trump is the most impotant thing to them, surpasses everything, country included, and if one objects they are subject to ridicule.
You are asking me why you shouldn't be bothered by what you claim is trump bending laws. If you accepted biden outright breaking them, my answer is hypocrisy. You should not be bothered, in order to refrain from hypocrisy.
What law is trump "bending" that exceeds what you tolerated from biden?
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
26 Feb 2025 10:57 pm
Cannonpointer » 26 Feb 2025, 11:18 pm » wrote: ↑ You are still dancing around my question - and now you presume to demand answers?
If I give you a list of perfectly innocent people imprisoned - many of them for years, without trials, - what will change in your view of J6?
You are asking me to provide you with evidence. Tell me what that evidence would mean to you. If I can establish my claim, what will change?
show the list of people convicted for something they did not do.
26 Feb 2025 11:03 pm
Cannonpointer » 26 Feb 2025, 11:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Were you bothered when the "big guy" got ten percent of his kid's business interests in foreign countries - at least one of which was and is viewed as an adversary?
You are asking me why you shouldn't be bothered by what you claim is trump bending laws. If you accepted biden outright breaking them, my answer is hypocrisy. You should not be bothered, in order to refrain from hypocrisy.
What law is trump "bending" that exceeds what you tolerated from biden?
I complained a lot about biden changing title 9 to allow boys in girls sports but apparently I was wrong to complain because he was the president and had presidential authority.
27 Feb 2025 4:37 am
Cannonpointer » 26 Feb 2025, 8:06 pm » wrote: ↑ I know you are a beta male because of your posts - not because I've seen the crime against manhood between your shaved gams, Florence.
Let me show you why you were instructed to PRETEND to give a **** about the medical system in a country you could never find on a map, and to hate a man named Viktor Orban of whose ethnicity, language, education, upbringing, motivations, and politics you know nothing. Watch and learn.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RYVqHmLXy4
Brain power is inversely proportional to dick size. People to do stupid shyt just to get phooked.
More men are born than women. By the time they reach 50 there are more women. The testosterone factor takes men out.
That is why the cougar population is growing.
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
Bump Caps Recommended..
Bump Caps Recommended..
27 Feb 2025 6:16 am
Nobody ever used it since dawn of civilization creating laws regulating conversations cradle to grave. Reasonable doubt protects those living a self deception cradle to grave, not inception to extinction of their own ancestral lineage of current 6 generation gaps living each rotation here now.jerra b » 26 Feb 2025, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑ it is an allegory dumb *** and no one ever used it before me.
Instinctive honesty is required sacrifice to mind social consensus until extinction happens from a species destroying itself inside out thinking outside self contained to one's own time adapting in plain sight today.
I will match my unique chromosomes to any alphabet reality to how and why each ancestors is alive this rotation with my algorithm. I can account for each ancestor regardless species with this algorithm with using simple 26 letters and 10 integers 0-9 with a map of event horizons separating each lifetime here now regardless day of the week, generation gap, ancestral lineage, plant, animal, predatory, prey nature, clock, calendar, history recording how people performed cradle tog rave regardless race, creed, color, national origin, gender, etc.
See this figure measures event horizons to gaseous, liquid, mineral molecular content with 119 identifies characteristics structuring this universal position.
7 degrees of isolating each specific molecular characteristics involved 7 days a week thermodynamics leaves nothing of everything something unique anytime occupying space now inorganically or ancestrally part of the universe here, now.
this one maps out 5 specific ancestral lineages by the numbers of ancestors involved adding a next generation arriving at the core of existing in plain sight now. the 4 parallel to center vertical axis was sustained by 16 great great grandparents to the 8 corners of great grandparents delivering the horizontal plan of 4 grandparents adding the two polarities of mom and dad to each great great grandchild's unique chromosomes in streaming DNA today.
I changed my mind back to navigating space in 1982. I stayed out of sight and minds all around me until 2006 when humanity decided one of my siblings needed a lesson on never standing against the people in charge of tomorrow daily here. National media got involved.
Same methods used against Trump since 2016.
27 Feb 2025 6:21 am
90%.....can you figure it from here, or do you need names and addresses?
27 Feb 2025 6:23 am
No, you are just a grandmother with female grandchildren....it's understandable. What isn't is your love for Palestinian terrorists.jerrab » 27 Feb 2025, 12:03 am » wrote: ↑ I complained a lot about biden changing title 9 to allow boys in girls sports but apparently I was wrong to complain because he was the president and had presidential authority.
27 Feb 2025 6:25 am
the justice system. where criminals get convicted for the crimes they commit. where people who smash windows receive punishment. if you have a problem wth this i guess you don't care if your car windows get smashed or your house windows.Cannonpointer » 26 Feb 2025, 11:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Were you bothered when the "big guy" got ten percent of his kid's business interests in foreign countries - at least one of which was and is viewed as an adversary?
You are asking me why you shouldn't be bothered by what you claim is trump bending laws. If you accepted biden outright breaking them, my answer is hypocrisy. You should not be bothered, in order to refrain from hypocrisy.
What law is trump "bending" that exceeds what you tolerated from biden?
27 Feb 2025 6:37 am
You're being convoluted again.....in the past when someone is lawfully evicted, you have advocated for the process servers to be killed.jerrab » 27 Feb 2025, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑ the justice system. where criminals get convicted for the crimes they commit. where people who smash windows receive punishment. if you have a problem wth this i guess you don't care if your car windows get smashed or your house windows.
27 Feb 2025 6:50 am
RebelGator » 27 Feb 2025, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑ 90%.....can you figure it from here, or do you need names and addresses?
names and what were they convicted for.
27 Feb 2025 7:06 am
So you now believe Biden had the enumerated power to arbitrarily change the number of "genders"? I'd like to see that power in the Constitution - become more educated.jerrab » 27 Feb 2025, 12:03 am » wrote: ↑ I complained a lot about biden changing title 9 to allow boys in girls sports but apparently I was wrong to complain because he was the president and had presidential authority.
My response stands - unaddressed. You axed why, I told you why.
And then I axed what laws trump is "bending." Still wondering.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
27 Feb 2025 7:07 am
I am always bemused by those who hit "reply" and then don't.JohnnyYou » 27 Feb 2025, 5:37 am » wrote: ↑ Brain power is inversely proportional to dick size. People to do stupid shyt just to get phooked.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
27 Feb 2025 7:18 am
I never did.RebelGator » 27 Feb 2025, 7:37 am » wrote: ↑ You're being convoluted again.....in the past when someone is lawfully evicted, you have advocated for the process servers to be killed.
27 Feb 2025 7:20 am
You supported terrorists killing Jews because they were evicted.....ring a bell?
27 Feb 2025 7:21 am
Cannonpointer » 27 Feb 2025, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑ So you now believe Biden had the enumerated power to arbitrarily change the number of "genders"? I'd like to see that power in the Constitution - become more educated.
My response stands - unaddressed. You axed why, I told you why.
And then I axed what laws trump is "bending." Still wondering.
apparently he did because he had presidential authority just like trump does now.
Who is online
In total there are 5137 users online :: 6 registered, 16 bots, and 5115 guests
Bots: Not, MQQBrowser, Bolt, MicroMessenger, NING, Mediatoolkitbot, YandexBot, ADmantX, proximic, facebookexternalhit, Applebot, CriteoBot, Googlebot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, bingbot