You prefer a fashy daddy...to hold you, til the fear in you subsidesCannonpointer » 28 Feb 2025, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑ In my case, it's pick your poison, child.
I prefer the one who doesn't let roving gangs burn cities, forcing citizens - sometimes mere children, - to respond with guns, and then criminalizing the citizens.
You queers are **** sick. I remember how your press went after that lawyer couple for simply standing in their yard with rifles - not pointing them at anyone, just standing at the ready to protect their home. The gang that was walking through their gated community uninvited on an errand of mischief was part of a reign of terror that had beaten a policeman to death just a few miles away the day before that. And you lynch mob mother **** cheered when dishonest prosecutors tried to criminalize their exercise of their Constitutional AND HUMAN right of measured and appropriate self defense. They picked no fight - just equipped themselves for the one being threatened by the invasion of their gated community by thugs.
And yes, thugs is code for ***. Suck on it.
Damn, that’s a lot of words just to say ‘I have unresolved issues and a thesaurus.’ But hey, at least you're consistent—losing and embarrassing yourself at the same time is truly an art form.Blackvegetable » 28 Feb 2025, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑ You prefer a fashy daddy...to hold you, til the fear in you subsides
Vegas » 28 Feb 2025, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Damn, that’s a lot of words just to say ‘I have unresolved issues and a thesaurus.’ But hey, at least you're consistent—losing and embarrassing yourself at the same time is truly an art form.
It's yet another allusion you are much too **** stupid to get...Vegas » 28 Feb 2025, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Damn, that’s a lot of words just to say ‘I have unresolved issues and a thesaurus.’ But hey, at least you're consistent—losing and embarrassing yourself at the same time is truly an art form.
Oh wow, the classic "You just don’t get it" defense—otherwise known as the last refuge of someone who can’t explain their own nonsense.Blackvegetable » 28 Feb 2025, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑ It's yet another allusion you are much too **** stupid to get...
As always.
Hey Sumela the Dickhead

You never do.Vegas » 28 Feb 2025, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh wow, the classic "You just don’t get it" defense—otherwise known as the last refuge of someone who can’t explain their own nonsense.
Characterize it in whatever language makes you feel warm and fuzzy, freak.Blackvegetable » 28 Feb 2025, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑ You prefer a fashy daddy...to hold you, til the fear in you subsides
Good Lord we are dumb as shyt.nefarious101 » 27 Feb 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ TUMP, BONDI, PATEL, BONGINO have all said, "Rooting out the corrupt and bring them to justice is job one."
The money laundering scheme is so big that it rivals LARGE 1st world economies.
Who's behind it?...pretty much everyone with a long history in DC., both elected and bureaucratic.
Pure Progressive in nature as both parties where infiltrated by greed, power and money,
Trillions embezzled, wasted, kicked back....and they their only goal is to get American's fighting each other over the new guy in town who's trying to clean it all up.
These exact same people allow deadly forms of narcotics, child sex trafficking, disease and terrorism to cross our borders unimpeded.
So what do you say?.....full speed ahead and keep doing what we've been doing or change it?
The people involved in this MASSIVE Taxpayer money laundering scheme want to keep the scheme going at any cost
History will tell you that this isn't the first time Progressives in America have tried this
Don't tell me, the old "**** writes itself " defense after copying/pasting me. Moron, that’s because you don’t know how to write anything better. At this point, you're not even arguing—you’re just playing stenographer for your own humiliation.
You want to relive the frisson you always felt at your Daddy's premature "arrival".Cannonpointer » 28 Feb 2025, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Characterize it in whatever language makes you feel warm and fuzzy, freak.
I prefer that American be safe in their homes, and I prefer that if they are made unsafe by law breakers, defending themselves appropriately will not make them unsafe from their own government.
No....seriously..Vegas » 28 Feb 2025, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't tell me, the old "**** writes itself " defense after copying/pasting me. Moron, that’s because you don’t know how to write anything better. At this point, you're not even arguing—you’re just playing stenographer for your own humiliation.
Keep trying, fruit. What you cannot do is address what I said, so you address me, my motivation - anything you can pretend something about.Blackvegetable » 28 Feb 2025, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑ You want to relive the frisson you always felt at your Daddy's premature "arrival".
You may have been left frustrated, but there was satisfaction in your continuing appeal.
Did I mention that you suck dick and have syphilis of the uvula?Cannonpointer » 28 Feb 2025, 3:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Keep trying, fruit. What you cannot do is address what I said, so you address me, my motivation - anything you can pretend something about.
That is what you do. You avoid issues and go after people,. because you are a mediocre intellect. I address issues and go after people, because I am an intelligent intellect and an asshole.
I'd be disappointed if you didn't.Blackvegetable » 28 Feb 2025, 3:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Did I mention that you suck dick and have syphilis of the uvula?
I'm just reading your tramp stamp...Cannonpointer » 28 Feb 2025, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑ I'd be disappointed if you didn't.
Homophobic smears ARE your stock in trade, after all.
You're just attacking the person rather than addressing the issue.
Here’s the deal—I'll agree to your little copy-paste game if you can actually provide an original thought about any of them. No regurgitated one-liners, no lazy parroting—just one, single, coherent, intelligent analysis in your own words.
No deal necessary.Vegas » 28 Feb 2025, 3:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Here’s the deal—I'll agree to your little copy-paste game if you can actually provide an original thought about any of them. No regurgitated one-liners, no lazy parroting—just one, single, coherent, intelligent analysis in your own words.
Think you can manage that, or is Ctrl+C your only functional skill?