And it's even worse than that!*GHETTOBLASTER » Today, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ Hardly a day goes by without news of more waste, fraud and incompetence that DOGE has revealed.
[[[MSM BRAINWASHED GOYIM]]] like you have been trained to believe that no waste, fraud and incompetence exist
Watching you have your daily temper tantrums sure is great fun..........
I just posted the facts...you can't get them straight.
Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I just posted the facts...you can't get them straight.
Nice facial.......organic?
Wait.*Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I also posted facts. Mucks admits there will be mistakes and he fix them. Get over yourself. If you had spent this much time criticizing Biden you might have a shred of credibility.
Elaborate on this rule, Tiny...If you had spent this much time criticizing Biden
Blackvegetable » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I just posted the facts...you can't get them straight.
Nice facial.......organic?
They made a mistake and they corrected it. As he said he would. I forgot, in your mind, you are perfect.Blackvegetable » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Wait.
No....you posted excuses.
By how many orders of magnitude has Elon been obliged to revise the ERRORS referred to in the citation?
Elaborate on this rule, Tiny...
Reason would suggest that 2XWorse than Buchanan would provide more fuel for criticism than Tied for 13th...
Even at the corrected lower total, at that pace the savings will be in excess of $141 million after 12 months. Are you saying it's a bad thing to save $141,000,000?Blackvegetable » Today, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑ While George W. Bush was president, the U.S. Coast Guard signed a contract to get administrative help from a company in Northern Virginia. It paid $144,000, and the contract was completed by June 30, 2005. Twenty years passed. Presidents came and went.
Last week, Elon Musk’s restructuring team, called the Department of Government Efficiency or DOGE, said it had just canceled the long-dead Coast Guard contract — and in doing so, saved U.S. taxpayers $53.7 million.
......
By last week, all of those claims were gone. DOGE revised the total savings from these five cuts from $10 billion down to about $19 million. At the same time, Mr. Musk’s group also added about 1,100 new canceled contracts to the list.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/02/us/p ... rrors.html
"B.....b....b....but he cracked Linear Elamite in summer camp!"
So **** g'ddammned stupid.
Do you think it's wrong to correct a mistake?Blackvegetable » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
By how many orders of magnitude has Elon been obliged to revise the ERRORS referred to in the citation?
Blackvegetable » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Wait.
No....you posted excuses.
By how many orders of magnitude has Elon been obliged to revise the ERRORS referred to in the citation?
Elaborate on this rule, Tiny...
Reason would suggest that 2XWorse than Buchanan would provide more fuel for criticism than Tied for 13th...
Don't be a **** idiot.*Huey » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ *******, when you are dealing with trillions, billions and millions the order of magnitude is going to be high.
It isn't "a mistake".
How many mistakes?*Huey » 35 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ They made a mistake and they corrected it. As he said he would. I forgot, in your mind, you are perfect.
Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ It isn't "a mistake".
Why are you always compelled to lie?
I’ve got you figured out with 100% accuracy because your MO never changes—same weak insults, same tired tactics, same desperate need for attention.So tell me, why are you this predictable? Do you just not have another setting, or is originality something you actively avoid?
You lied, ran and diverted.*Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Make your case. I ha ve made mine. Until you start answering questions on a regular basis you do not have the privilege.
How many mistakes?*Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ It’s a mistake that was corrected. You didn’t answer his question. That is why n o one answers yours.
No....I'm saying **** is a bad thing.ConsRule » 38 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Even at the corrected lower total, at that pace the savings will be in excess of $141 million after 12 months. Are you saying it's a bad thing to save $141,000,000?
Askholio, who knows. They are still working.Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑How many mistakes?*Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ It’s a mistake that was corrected. You didn’t answer his question. That is why n o one answers yours.
So **** g'ddammned stupid
Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑How many mistakes?*Huey » 45 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ They made a mistake and they corrected it. As he said he would. I forgot, in your mind, you are perfect.
I haven't ran, idiot. I am still here. I am going to the store and getting some gas. Is that ok with you, DP?Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑You lied, ran and diverted.*Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Make your case. I ha ve made mine. Until you start answering questions on a regular basis you do not have the privilege.
**** idiot.