Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 7:27 am

While George W. Bush was president, the U.S. Coast Guard signed a contract to get administrative help from a company in Northern Virginia. It paid $144,000, and the contract was completed by June 30, 2005. Twenty years passed. Presidents came and went. 

Last week, Elon Musk’s restructuring team, called the Department of Government Efficiency or DOGE, said it had just canceled the long-dead Coast Guard contract — and in doing so, saved U.S. taxpayers $53.7 million.

......

By last week, all of those claims were gone. DOGE revised the total savings from these five cuts from $10 billion down to about $19 million. At the same time, Mr. Musk’s group also added about 1,100 new canceled contracts to the list.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/02/us/p ... rrors.html

"B.....b....b....but he cracked Linear Elamite in summer camp!"

So **** g'ddammned stupid.

sounds like joe's monthly jobs report....  


Christopher Byrne, a retired senior government contracting officer who reviewed NPR's findings, said that data entry errors are inevitable, but DOGE's quiet changes reflect a "failure of due diligence" that likely comes from focusing on speed and volume over accuracy — and in turn misleading the public.
 

ConsRule » Yesterday, 8:45 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:45 pm

Yes...but I also said I will not answer your question until you provide proof of your assertion that the restatement was not simply to correct a mistake.  Looks like the ball is still in your court.

 

Yes...but I also said

Go wax your box, bitch.
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:09 am

Go wax your box, bitch.

As I suspected...your whiny *** liberal bitch self was simply making **** up.  Your hate of Trump is worrisome...you should consider counseling.
 

ConsRule » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

As I suspected...your whiny *** liberal bitch self was simply making **** up.  Your hate of Trump is worrisome...you should consider counseling.

Whatever you need to tell yourself to cope...


 

Blackvegetable » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

Whatever you need to tell yourself to cope...

You're the one that needs to cope.  While I think your shtick is very amusing...I have some concern you may have another mental breakdown before Trump finishes his term and Vance completes his two.

ConsRule » 26 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

26 minutes ago

You're the one that needs to cope.  While I think your shtick is very amusing...I have some concern you may have another mental breakdown before Trump finishes his term and Vance completes his two.

Connie,

If you insist on running from all questions, have the decency to stop yapping.
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:56 am

Connie,

If you insist on running from all questions, have the decency to stop yapping.
 

 

That is fuicking hilarious coming from you.  
 

*Huey » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

That is fuicking hilarious coming from you.

Why, Neverrun? 

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:56 am

Connie,

If you insist on running from all questions, have the decency to stop yapping.

yapp yapp yapp yapp yapp

(might want to get used to seeing that response)
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:56 am

Connie,

If you insist on running from all questions, have the decency to stop yapping.

BTW...I will happily answer your questions.  However, when I ask you a question first...you WILL provide a direct answer before I even consider answering your question(s).  That is how "conversations" with me work...your happiness about and agreement with my rule is not necessary, hell...I don't care if you like it or not.

ConsRule » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

16 minutes ago

BTW...I will happily answer your questions.  However, when I ask you a question first...you WILL provide a direct answer before I even consider answering your question(s).  That is how "conversations" with me work...your happiness about and agreement with my rule is not necessary, hell...I don't care if you like it or not.

Instead of leading with the empty smack talk, you should open by declaring your Very Special Rules of Engagement. 

Doing so AFTER your request has been satisfied is why Romans saw you as catnip.

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Instead of leading with the empty smack talk, you should open by declaring your Very Special Rules of Engagement. 

Doing so AFTER your request has been satisfied is why Romans saw you as catnip.

 

There is nothing wrong with his request.  And it sounds vey familiar.  How about you just post your special ROE, the where you feel you are not obliged to answer questions but demand others answer your.

*Huey » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

There is nothing wrong with his request.  And it sounds vey familiar.  How about you just post your special ROE, the where you feel you are not obliged to answer questions but demand others answer your.

Neverrun,

Get back to waxing our box.

ConsRule » 33 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

33 minutes ago

yapp yapp yapp yapp yapp

(might want to get used to seeing that response)

Already am...

Blackvegetable » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

Instead of leading with the empty smack talk, you should open by declaring your Very Special Rules of Engagement. 

 

I just did...that's the only one.  For someone who is supposed to be so highly educated and credential...you are one dumb mother ****.
 

Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Neverrun,

Get back to waxing your box.
 

 

Looks like that virus is back on your devices.

Here it is again:

There is nothing wrong with his request.  And it sounds vey familiar.  How about you just post your special ROE, the where you feel you are not obliged to answer questions but demand others answer your.
 

Blackvegetable » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

19 minutes ago

Instead of leading with the empty smack talk, you should open by declaring your Very Special Rules of Engagement. 

Doing so AFTER your request has been satisfied is why Romans saw you as catnip.
 

BTW...I led with a statement that I would happily answer your question (with that condition).  That is not "leading with smack talk".  To "lead" with smack talk would require it to be first in the post. Yet another example of your stupidity.  I do give you credit, however, your commitment to stupidity is very consistent.

ConsRule » 46 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

46 minutes ago

BTW...I will happily answer your questions.  However, when I ask you a question first...you WILL provide a direct answer before I even consider answering your question(s).  That is how "conversations" with me work...your happiness about and agreement with my rule is not necessary, hell...I don't care if you like it or not.

 

Blackvegetable » 40 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

40 minutes ago

Instead of leading with the empty smack talk, you should open by declaring your Very Special Rules of Engagement. 

Doing so AFTER your request has been satisfied is why Romans saw you as catnip.

ConsRule » 27 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

27 minutes ago

I just did...that's the only one.  For someone who is supposed to be so highly educated and credential...you are one dumb mother ****.

The dumbest...