Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:09 am

Go wax your box, bitch.

brown, you've used it all up...
 

ConsRule » Yesterday, 5:35 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 5:35 pm

You still haven't provided proof the original statement was intentionally false.  Posting snips of the original article is not proof.  I would think you would know that if you are as smart and credentialed as you claim to be.

By how many orders of magnitude did DOGE overstate its efficiency according to the excerpt?

Provide your proof it wasn't a mistake, then I'll answer your question...not before.

at which point you are shown that it wasn't "a mistake"....it was 5 mistakes.

Your question was answered.  Honestly, accurately and completely.

Then your question morphed, and you assumed a position of abject submission.

My question remains unanswered.

*Huey » 30 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

30 minutes ago

Looks like that virus is back on your devices.

Here it is again:

There is nothing wrong with his request.  And it sounds vey familiar.  How about you just post your special ROE, the where you feel you are not obliged to answer questions but demand others answer your.

Your recall sucks.

You're both welshing cowards.