Liberal Forum

French: So, what is your best estimate about the DOGE savings right now? Riedl: Perhaps $2 billion, which they claim is $55 billion. Even that $2 billion may not ultimately happen because technically speaking, DOGE cannot impound and unilaterally reduce federal spending. Any spending cuts legally have to be reprogrammed elsewhere unless Congress goes in and reduces the spending levels. So right now I would say DOGE has saved $2 billion, which, to put it in context, is one-thirty-fifth of 1 percent of the federal budget, otherwise known as budget dust.

....French: The implication of what you’re saying is that DOGE is causing an awful lot of disruption to federal operations without doing anything material to address the long-term fiscal challenge America is facing.

 Riedl: I would call what DOGE is doing “government spending-cut theater.” The targets they’re going after are not where the money is. D.E.I. contracts, Politico Pro subscriptions, federal employees, foreign aid. Some of it is essentially a rounding error, but they are targets that hit a lot of cultural touchstones for a lot of conservatives. DOGE is really a distraction from the spending increases and tax cuts Congress is really doing right now.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/05/opin ... -doge.html


Et tu, Manhattan Institute?

I think someone already called out this bit of performance art.


"We're gonna get $5,000!"

So **** g'ddammned stupid 
 

JohnnyYou » 05 Mar 2025, 6:31 am » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 6:31 am

Betsy Devos couldn't find her boat if it was between her legs.

These idiots want to abandon a National Education Strategy as AI gets smarter than us at an incredible rate.  When she wakes up we'll be watching Skynet.

Democrats can't tell the difference between a man and a woman

They were even asked

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 6:42 am » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 6:42 am

You, Rube?

Your olfactory imagery is manifested here daily.....the verdict is universal, except for your two retarded buds, squatch and john-john.

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 5:56 am » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 5:56 am

French: So, what is your best estimate about the DOGE savings right now? 

Riedl: Perhaps $2 billion, which they claim is $55 billion. Even that $2 billion may not ultimately happen because technically speaking, DOGE cannot impound and unilaterally reduce federal spending. Any spending cuts legally have to be reprogrammed elsewhere unless Congress goes in and reduces the spending levels. So right now I would say DOGE has saved $2 billion, which, to put it in context, is one-thirty-fifth of 1 percent of the federal budget, otherwise known as budget dust.

....French: The implication of what you’re saying is that DOGE is causing an awful lot of disruption to federal operations without doing anything material to address the long-term fiscal challenge America is facing.

 Riedl: I would call what DOGE is doing “government spending-cut theater.” The targets they’re going after are not where the money is. D.E.I. contracts, Politico Pro subscriptions, federal employees, foreign aid. Some of it is essentially a rounding error, but they are targets that hit a lot of cultural touchstones for a lot of conservatives. DOGE is really a distraction from the spending increases and tax cuts Congress is really doing right now.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/05/opin ... -doge.html

Et tu, Manhattan Institute?

I think someone already called out this bit of performance art.

"We're gonna get $5,000!"

So **** g'ddammned stupid

brown, who are these people? TDSers or DOGE heads?
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 7:01 am » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 7:01 am

I don't see an answer, Hole.

We notice you get your information from CNN , The NY Times and Wash Post

Explains everything

Didn't they give each other awards on the Russian Collusion investigation?

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 5:56 am » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 5:56 am

French: So, what is your best estimate about the DOGE savings right now? Riedl: Perhaps $2 billion, which they claim is $55 billion. Even that $2 billion may not ultimately happen because technically speaking, DOGE cannot impound and unilaterally reduce federal spending. Any spending cuts legally have to be reprogrammed elsewhere unless Congress goes in and reduces the spending levels. So right now I would say DOGE has saved $2 billion, which, to put it in context, is one-thirty-fifth of 1 percent of the federal budget, otherwise known as budget dust.

....French: The implication of what you’re saying is that DOGE is causing an awful lot of disruption to federal operations without doing anything material to address the long-term fiscal challenge America is facing.

 Riedl: I would call what DOGE is doing “government spending-cut theater.” The targets they’re going after are not where the money is. D.E.I. contracts, Politico Pro subscriptions, federal employees, foreign aid. Some of it is essentially a rounding error, but they are targets that hit a lot of cultural touchstones for a lot of conservatives. DOGE is really a distraction from the spending increases and tax cuts Congress is really doing right now.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/05/opin ... -doge.html

Et tu, Manhattan Institute?

I think someone already called out this bit of performance art.

"We're gonna get $5,000!"

So **** g'ddammned stupid

Another PG thread?  Wow, Did your daughter see this hypocrisy?

*Huey » 36 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

36 minutes ago

Another PG thread?  Wow, Did your daughter see this hypocrisy?

Who is being called out?
Tiny's on another "everything is the same" jag.