Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 7:11 am

I am the dumbest mother **** alive.

Hey, I have the perfect challenge for you. There is no way that you will say no to this. 

Challenge: You provide evidence that I am a moron under one stipulation:
Stipulation: You must provide intelligent thoughts of your own about this so-called evidence as to why it makes me a moron. 

You aren't fit to judge, so Cannon will...and yes, I know, you think he has syphilis. 

Loser takes off a month. 

Deal?

*Beekeeper » 05 Mar 2025, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 3:23 pm

You got PWNED and you know it, SUCKYBOY!!

TARIFFS ALONE cause a ONE TIME price increase which is NOT INFLATIONARY since it doesn't continue a price increase over time. THAT'S how the value of money is deteriorated, along with MONETARY POLICY AND PRINTING MORE MONEY!!

PERIOD!!

Please stop.

Tariffs don't just affect finished goods...


https://www.bostonfed.org/publications/ ... -inflation


For example, we estimate that an additional 25 percent tariff on goods from Canada and Mexico combined with an additional 10 percent tariff on goods from China could add as much as 0.8 percentage point to core (excluding food and energy) inflation. By contrast, the policy that was proposed during the presidential campaign, an additional 60 percent tariff on imports from China and an additional 10 percent tariff on imports from the rest of the world, could have contributed as much as an additional 2.2 percentage points to core inflation.1 It is important to emphasize that our estimates represent a first-round effect on prices. That is, they do not take into account how consumers and competitors eventually might adjust to the import price increases that tariffs induce


 

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 3:41 pm

Please stop.

Tariffs don't just affect finished goods...

https://www.bostonfed.org/publications/ ... -inflation

For example, we estimate that an additional 25 percent tariff on goods from Canada and Mexico combined with an additional 10 percent tariff on goods from China could add as much as 0.8 percentage point to core (excluding food and energy) inflation. By contrast, the policy that was proposed during the presidential campaign, an additional 60 percent tariff on imports from China and an additional 10 percent tariff on imports from the rest of the world, could have contributed as much as an additional 2.2 percentage points to core inflation.1 It is important to emphasize that our estimates represent a first-round effect on prices. That is, they do not take into account how consumers and competitors eventually might adjust to the import price increases that tariffs induce

No thoughts, etc...copy/paste. Your response was level 1. 

Vegas » 05 Mar 2025, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 3:43 pm

No thoughts, etc...copy/paste. Your response was level 1.

Tantrumstalking.^^^^^

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 3:48 pm

Tantrumstalking.^^^^^

I see you are running from my deal again. Always running. Always.

@Blackvegetable  Now coward! This should be low-hanging fruit for you. 

Challenge: You provide evidence that I am a moron under one stipulation:
Stipulation: You must provide intelligent thoughts of your own about this so-called evidence as to why it makes me a moron. 

You aren't fit to judge, so Cannon will...and yes, I know, you think he has syphilis. 

Loser takes off a month. 

Deal?

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 3:41 pm

Please stop.

Tariffs don't just affect finished goods...

https://www.bostonfed.org/publications/ ... -inflation

For example, we estimate that an additional 25 percent tariff on goods from Canada and Mexico combined with an additional 10 percent tariff on goods from China could add as much as 0.8 percentage point to core (excluding food and energy) inflation. By contrast, the policy that was proposed during the presidential campaign, an additional 60 percent tariff on imports from China and an additional 10 percent tariff on imports from the rest of the world, could have contributed as much as an additional 2.2 percentage points to core inflation.1 It is important to emphasize that our estimates represent a first-round effect on prices. That is, they do not take into account how consumers and competitors eventually might adjust to the import price increases that tariffs induce

Uh, WORDS like COULD, MAY, CAN are ALL WORDS USED AS OPINION, not as something FACTUAL, Dr. DIKSUKM!!

PLEASE. STOP before you get all nasty and **** from the MASSIVE CURB STOMPINGS YOU'RE GETTING HERE!!

 

*Beekeeper » 05 Mar 2025, 3:55 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 3:55 pm

Uh, WORDS like COULD, MAY, CAN are ALL WORDS USED AS OPINION, not as something FACTUAL, Dr. DIKSUKM!!

PLEASE. STOP before you get all nasty and **** from the MASSIVE CURB STOMPINGS YOU'RE GETTING HERE!!

It's obvious he hinges on the narrative, not the facts...

ROG62 » 05 Mar 2025, 4:53 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 4:53 pm

It's obvious he hinges on the narrative, not the facts...

Notice he is now....

https://www.icegif.com/wp-content/uploa ... f-1251.gif

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 7:11 am

The Trump administration on Tuesday placed sweeping tariffs on goods from Canada, Mexico and China, the United States’ three largest trading partners. The result, economists and industry experts say, could be swift and noticeable: Depending on where they live, Americans can expect to pay an extra 20 cents per gallon of gas, an additional 50 cents for each avocado, and thousands more on new vehicles, almost immediately.

 “We have cars landing tonight, which means tomorrow’s cars are going to be more expensive,” John Luciano, owner of Street Volkswagen in Amarillo, Texas, said Tuesday. “I’m not sure the consumer has caught on yet to how much cars are going to go up, but it’s going to be big.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business ... americans/

So **** g'ddammned stupid. 

You actually voted for this..

Cretins.

This may come as a surprise to you, but (using Feb as the month in each year), Biden had a higher rate of inflation...without tariffs...three out of four years than Trump ever had during his first term...with tariffs.
 

ConsRule » 05 Mar 2025, 5:42 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 5:42 pm

This may come as a surprise to you, but (using Feb as the month in each year), Biden had a higher rate of inflation...without tariffs...three out of four years than Trump ever had during his first term...with tariffs.

You're a **** idiot.

Just spare us all and run.

Now.
 

Vegas » 05 Mar 2025, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 3:43 pm

No thoughts, etc...copy/paste. Your response was level 1.

Share yours...

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 5:55 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 5:55 pm

You're a **** idiot.

Just spare us all and run.

Now.

You really are a light weight piss ant, in spite of all your pretentiousness, it shines thru like a burning sun.

RebelGator » 05 Mar 2025, 6:08 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 6:08 pm

You really are a light weight piss ant, in spite of all your pretentiousness, it shines thru like a burning sun.

Then why are you all so bitter?

I don't indulge Cunnstance because Cunnstance yaps smack while on the run.


 

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 6:04 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 6:04 pm

Share yours...

Your OP, your job. 

Do you need the video again? You have the worst memory ever.

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 5:55 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 5:55 pm

You're a **** idiot.

Just spare us all and run.

Now.

According to the BLS... Year-over-year inflation rate:

Feb 2017 - 2.7% Trump
Feb 2018 - 2.2% Trump
Feb 2019 - 1.9% Trump
Feb 2020 - 2.3% Trump
Feb 2021 - 1.7% Biden
Feb 2022 - 7.9% Biden
Feb 2023 - 6.0% Biden
Feb 2024 - 3.2% Biden

I understand accepting fact is emotionally challenging for you...but those are the numbers.  Now is the time when you start asking irrelevant questions, calling people names, trying to change the subject and/or making **** up.

Carry on.
 

ConsRule » 05 Mar 2025, 6:59 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 6:59 pm

According to the BLS... Year-over-year inflation rate:

Feb 2017 - 2.7% Trump
Feb 2018 - 2.2% Trump
Feb 2019 - 1.9% Trump
Feb 2020 - 2.3% Trump
Feb 2021 - 1.7% Biden
Feb 2022 - 7.9% Biden
Feb 2023 - 6.0% Biden
Feb 2024 - 3.2% Biden

I understand accepting fact is emotionally challenging for you...but those are the numbers.  Now is the time when you start asking irrelevant questions, calling people names, trying to change the subject and/or making **** up.

Carry on.

Cunnstance,

When I ask "And which exogenous factors are affecting the inflation rate today?", you'll start with the whinyassMAGAtmegachurch thing you do.


Just run.
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 7:27 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 7:27 pm

Cunnstance,

When I ask "And which exogenous factors are affecting the inflation rate today?", you'll start with the whinyassMAGAtmegachurch thing you do.

Just run.

You will always find...make up...some whiny *** liberal excuse.  Totally expected.

HAHAHAHA

This thread...

NHB...

Running in circles...

Prices are  definitely heading north. Globally, in a world trade war.  It's never been a better time for corporate profits.

Joe is in Delaware now.  The World Capitol of Corps.  The Great Rip Off is bipartisan. I blame his involvement as much as Trump's

It is going to cause a global economic crisis. But hey, they'll have all the worthless currency in the universe.

Farmers, please pardon our interruption to your regularly scheduled programming.