Liberal Forum

*Huey » 05 Mar 2025, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 10:19 am

Just for the record that quote you have saved in a file has nothing to do with what you are talking about.  And when it was written it was a true stat covering 20 some odd years.

Well, that's one prediction confirmed...
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 3:17 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 3:17 pm

*Vegas

*Huey

*Beekeeper 

Oh, look...they all have stars before their names.

How precious!

*   *   *  
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 3:17 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 3:17 pm

*Vegas

*Huey

*Beekeeper 

Oh, look...they all have stars before their names.

How precious!

Okay, so I got two out of three. 

If I were a major league baseball player instead of a couch potato, I would have some bragging rights from a stat like that.

What am I saying? I still have a right to brag. It's the internet. Ima get some chips and construct a doozy. 
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 10:02 am

Unlike those of Solomon, the mines of liberalforum.net yield not treasures of the material sort, but as a compendium of American Stupid it is the Franklin Mint (assuming, of course, that the Franklin Mint was an actual mint).

It would be a disservice to future generations, puzzling over a people's eagerness to hand their shiny toy to a tantrum prone imbecile bubble boy, were we to fail to paint the portrait of "America - 2025".


Let this gallery stand in mute celebration of the National Rube.


I invite people to guess at the authors of the idiocies below.

Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period

I don't care about frequency. 4 of the last 8 winners were from small countries. THat is the point.

Do you REALLY want to claim that tariffs cause inflation??

YOU'RE making the claim that tariffs cause inflation. NOT ME!!

THAT causes prices to increase and the VALUE OF MONEY to DECREASE. Tariffs DO NOT cause the value of money to decrease and without that 2nd part, you have NO INFLATION!!

And since TARIFFS can actually cause a DECREASE IN DEMAND for goods with a tariff, the exact opposite of inflation CAN happen.  BUT TARIFFS ALONE do NOT cause inflation. PERIOD!!

 
 

 

Would you care to name the moron who said this about the 9 mil FMJ round?

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480
 

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:30 pm

Would you care to name the moron who said this about the 9 mil FMJ round?

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480

Dumb ****,

I said it in reference to the NATO 5.56.
 

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Dumb ****,

I said it in reference to the NATO 5.56.

You did it again. As always, you refuse to answer questions while demanding yours gets answered


Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
 

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Dumb ****,

I said in reference to the NATO 5.56.

No you didn't.  Here is what you were asked:

*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480

Just applying your logic.

Said LIKE THE COLT AR 15, ya lying lil bitch.  

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:35 pm

No you didn't.  Here is what you were asked:


 

I don't answer to your interpretations or retellings.

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

*Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

No you didn't.  Here is what you were asked:



 

I don't answer to your interpretations or retellings.

 

And I laugh at your lies, ****.  And you just got cut in a big one.

It is a matter of record with the **** link.  Keep lying ****.  Has not been a good time for you on this forum.

Blackvegetable » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

24 minutes ago

*Huey » 26 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

26 minutes ago

No you didn't.  Here is what you were asked:



 

I don't answer to your interpretations or retellings.

 

No you didn't.  Here is what you were asked:

*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

BV's reply:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480

Just applying your logic.

You said LIKE THE COLT AR 15, ya lying lil bitch.  


BV claimed he was talking about NATO 5.56.  Lied his *** off than he PG'd the post with this info.  What a ****** move.  He ain't ****.

Dumb ****,

I said it in reference to the NATO 5.56.


viewtopic.php?p=2766018#p2766018

I started a thread so I can remind you of your massive lie, ******.  Is it the dope or are you really this **** stupid?  

Sorry, had to break my own rule.  There were more lies in BVs  Comment than I care to count.

:rofl:  

Blackvegetable » 01 May 2025, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

01 May 2025, 8:26 am

Did you guess the moron?

I did not 

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 7:31 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 7:31 am

I hope you didn't resurrect this thread because you considered it to be of some value....  
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 10:02 am

Unlike those of Solomon, the mines of liberalforum.net yield not treasures of the material sort, but as a compendium of American Stupid it is the Franklin Mint (assuming, of course, that the Franklin Mint was an actual mint).

It would be a disservice to future generations, puzzling over a people's eagerness to hand their shiny toy to a tantrum prone imbecile bubble boy, were we to fail to paint the portrait of "America - 2025".

Let this gallery stand in mute celebration of the National Rube.

I invite people to guess at the authors of the idiocies below.

Someone gave you 100 greenies...you'll never guess his name.  "Ro"sham"bo"

I wonder who the alias is?      
 
P.S.  Looks like CP is one of his buddies.     

roadkill » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 10:02 am

Unlike those of Solomon, the mines of liberalforum.net yield not treasures of the material sort, but as a compendium of American Stupid it is the Franklin Mint (assuming, of course, that the Franklin Mint was an actual mint).

It would be a disservice to future generations, puzzling over a people's eagerness to hand their shiny toy to a tantrum prone imbecile bubble boy, were we to fail to paint the portrait of "America - 2025".

Let this gallery stand in mute celebration of the National Rube.

I invite people to guess at the authors of the idiocies below.

Someone gave you 100 greenies...you'll never guess his name.  "Ro"sham"bo"

I wonder who the alias is?      
 

 

In his profile he/she has a rank moderator.  

RebelGator » 14 Aug 2025, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 9:14 am

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 7:31 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 7:31 am

I hope you didn't resurrect this thread because you considered it to be of some value....  
 

 

He uncovers this thread when he is having difficult days on the forum.  

Blackvegetable » 01 May 2025, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

01 May 2025, 8:26 am

Did you guess the moron?

Yes. It was easy. He goes by Blackvegetable. 

 

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 9:33 am

He uncovers this thread when he is having difficult days on the forum.

I'm experiencing no difficulty at all "smashing" you.

 

BuckNaked » 14 Aug 2025, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 8:47 am

I did not

You know what they say about the @*pigeon at the table...

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

I'm experiencing no difficulty at all "smashing" you.

Oh please show us. Let's see this. 

All we see from you is "you are a **** moron." Level 0 responses.