Liberal Forum

*Huey » 16 Mar 2025, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 9:46 am

It’s over.  You lost. Another L for you.  My narrative Stands.

But it's not supported by a link.

Your rule.
 

Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 9:50 am

But it's not supported by a link.

Your rule.

Neither is yours. your rule, less than avg.  Thisbis your thread meaning we are playing by your rules.  You are going with no links necessary.  You lose.  

bye Legacy Admission.

*Huey » 16 Mar 2025, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 9:56 am

Neither is yours. your rule, less than avg.  Thisbis your thread meaning we are playing by your rules.  You are going with no links necessary.  You lose.  

bye Legacy Admission.

It is supported by a verbatim quote, which you acknowledge is accurate.

You've got bupkis.
 

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

It is supported by a verbatim quote, which you acknowledge is accurate.

You've got bupkis.

stfu you satan cocksucker

Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 10:01 am

It is supported by a verbatim quote, which you acknowledge is accurate.

You've got bupkis.

Verbatim does not mean in context.  You Offer many quotes that are out of context.  Because you are **** dishonest POS.

Until you offer contecpxt and refute what I said about it you lose.  You got Bupkis.  

RUN, ******, Run.

*Huey » 16 Mar 2025, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 10:03 am

Verbatim does not mean in context.  You Offer many quotes that are out of context.  Because you are **** dishonest POS.

Until you offer contecpxt and refute what I said about it you lose.  You got Bupkis.  

RUN, ******, Run.

Tiny,

It is your declaration that context is "irrelevant".

Is it false?
 

BV GETTING HIS *** *** BEAT DOWN AGAIN

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Tiny,

It is your declaration that context is "irrelevant".

Is it false?

And more questions from the Botched Abortion.  When you provide the link I will answer.  But, since your ex wife locked away your balls you are not man enough.  As my trip to Boston. showed.

*Huey » 16 Mar 2025, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 10:11 am

And more questions from the Botched Abortion.  When you provide the link I will answer.  But, since your ex wife locked away your balls you are not man enough.  As my trip to Boston. showed.

Tiny,

It is an unambiguous contradiction.


 

Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 10:26 am

Tiny,

It is an unambiguous contradiction.

What is?  Making a comment that has nothing to do with what was being discussed and you calling it context?  LMAO at your lies.

*Huey » 16 Mar 2025, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 10:28 am

What is?  Making a comment that has nothing to do with what was being discussed and you calling it context?  LMAO at your lies.

Again?
Asserting that "context is meaningless", then insisting on the context in which you did so.

Nod.


 

BV STUCK ON STUPID
 

Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 10:30 am

Again?
Asserting that "context is meaningless", then insisting on the context in which you did so.

Nod.

Still no link.  But no, that is not what I am asserting.  Try again 

*Huey » 16 Mar 2025, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 10:35 am

Still no link.  But no, that is not what I am asserting.  Try again

Then what do those words mean?

Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 12:24 pm

Then what do those words mean?

Already told ya.  You quoted.  Damn, your recall really, really sucks.

*Huey » 16 Mar 2025, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 12:26 pm

Already told ya.  You quoted.  Damn, your recall really, really sucks.

If "context is irrelevant", why are you demanding context?

Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 12:30 pm

If "context is irrelevant", why are you demanding context?

and another question.  You quoted the answer.  Now you are just being his honest.

*Huey » 16 Mar 2025, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 12:31 pm

and another question.  You quoted the answer.  Now you are just being his honest.

You said the dudes context was irrelevant.  Did you have some kind of eipiphimaniacal revelation or some thing?

CON TEXT..  Please pay your Dear Leader immediately.

JohnnyYou » 16 Mar 2025, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 12:40 pm

You said the dudes context was irrelevant.  Did you have some kind of eipiphimaniacal revelation or some thing?

CON TEXT..  Please pay your Dear Leader immediately.

Hey, that has already explained.  He lifted comment from quote made a few years back.  He twisted another quote and said it was the context.  It wasn't.  In that particular instance his "context" was not relevant because it was out of context.

But, Botched Abortion has never been honest.  Notice he rarely uses links when he plays this game.

*Huey » 16 Mar 2025, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 12:31 pm

and another question.  You quoted the answer.  Now you are just being his honest.

No I didn't, lying little ****...