Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 2:28 pm

No I didn't, lying little ****...

You certainly did, Meltdown Mary.

*Huey » 16 Mar 2025, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 12:56 pm

Hey, that has already explained.  He lifted comment from quote made a few years back.  He twisted another quote and said it was the context.  It wasn't.  In that particular instance his "context" was not relevant because it was out of context.

But, Botched Abortion has never been honest.  Notice he rarely uses links when he plays this game.

Tiny,

That's quite revealing...

But, if true, why not say "you've taken it out of context." 

Or "you've misrepresented the context".

"Your context is irrelevant." sounds like YOU were caught quoting out of context, and when busted wanted to claim that your lie was true REGARDLESS of context.

And everyone knows you lie, all the time.
 

Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 2:28 pm

No I didn't, lying little ****...

You didn't quote, Meltdown Mary.  You ran from it.  You not replying to a post is a concession that is correct.

This is what I told your buddy and which is similar to the post your ran from:

Hey, that has already explained.  He lifted comment from quote made a few years back.  He twisted another quote and said it was the context.  It wasn't.  In that particular instance his "context" was not relevant because it was out of context.

But, Botched Abortion has never been honest.  Notice he rarely uses links when he plays this game.

 

*Huey » 16 Mar 2025, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 2:29 pm

You certainly did, Meltdown Mary.

Then post it.

Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 2:32 pm

Tiny,

That's quite revealing...

But, if true, why not say "you've taken it out of context." 

Or "you've misrepresented the context".

"Your context is irrelevant." sounds like YOU were caught quoting out of context, and when busted wanted to claim that your lie was true REGARDLESS of context.

And everyone knows you lie, all the time.

As usual, you lose.  Just post the link, ArmsLength.  You are not man enough, are you. And you expect me to fear you?  Too funny.  As I said on your thread to your little butt buddy, neither of you would know ruthlessness if it was within arms length.

 

Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 2:32 pm

Then post it.

I did one already.


Waiting on you, lil punk.

*Huey » 16 Mar 2025, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 2:34 pm

As usual, you lose.  Just post the link, ArmsLength.  You are not man enough, are you. And you expect me to fear you?  Too funny.  As I said on your thread to your little butt buddy, neither of you would know ruthlessness if it was within arms length.

Notice how quickly you veer from the topic.....into meltdown? 

Why not just acknowledge that you're a lying zerointegrity coward and move on?
 

*Huey » 16 Mar 2025, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 2:35 pm

I did one already.

Waiting on you, lil punk.

That is neither an answer nor correct.



 

Blackvegetable » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

That is neither an answer nor correct.

Go **** yourself you god-damned stinking piece of ****.

*Huey » 16 Mar 2025, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 2:35 pm

I did one already.

Waiting on you, lil punk.

While I'm waiting..


Who decides when the U.S. is in a recession? Eight economists who serve on the Business Cycle Dating Committee, within a nonprofit research organization not affiliated with the federal government known as the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), make the call. 
  They are appointed by the NBER president James Poterba, who has held the position since 2008, after consultation with committee chairs and the nonprofit’s board of directors. 


https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/20 ... 233383007/



Don't you hate it when I'm always right?

BV IS NEVER RIGHT ABOUT ANYTHING

Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 2:46 pm

*Huey » 16 Mar 2025, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 2:34 pm

As usual, you lose.  Just post the link, ArmsLength.  You are not man enough, are you. And you expect me to fear you?  Too funny.  As I said on your thread to your little butt buddy, neither of you would know ruthlessness if it was within arms length.

Notice how quickly you veer from the topic.....into meltdown? 

Why not just acknowledge that you're a lying zerointegrity coward and move on?
 

 

LMAO!  Your answer was given.  You ran, as expected cowardly too far.  The record is clear on who is lying.  You lied about the context of your cherry picked quote and refuse to post a link.  A sing of a zero integrity cowardly POS.

Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 2:47 pm

*Huey » 16 Mar 2025, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 2:35 pm

I did one already.

Waiting on you, lil punk.

That is neither an answer nor correct.



 

 

It is correct, POS

Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 3:03 pm

*Huey » 16 Mar 2025, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 2:35 pm

I did one already.

Waiting on you, lil punk.

While I'm waiting..


Who decides when the U.S. is in a recession? Eight economists who serve on the Business Cycle Dating Committee, within a nonprofit research organization not affiliated with the federal government known as the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), make the call. 
  They are appointed by the NBER president James Poterba, who has held the position since 2008, after consultation with committee chairs and the nonprofit’s board of directors. 


https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/20 ... 233383007/



Don't you hate it when I'm always right?

 

Another diversion.  Run daddy;'soil ******, run.  You say "sniffle...sniffle..I had options".  LMAO!

*Huey » 16 Mar 2025, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 4:15 pm

LMAO!  Your answer was given.  You ran, as expected cowardly too far.  The record is clear on who is lying.  You lied about the context of your cherry picked quote and refuse to post a link.  A sing of a zero integrity cowardly POS.

It is correct, POS

Another diversion.  Run daddy;'soil ******, run.  You say "sniffle...sniffle..I had options".  LMAO!

LMAO!  Your answer was given

But you won't  post it.

You won't because you know you didn't answer the question, you responded wirh a narrative. It would be inconvenient for you given your performance on the other thread today where you lied about me answering your question.

The record is clear on who is lying.  You lied about the context of your cherry picked quote and refuse to post a link

No....you just made up a story for which you aren't providing any evidence. 

no one has reason to believe it because

a) it makes no sense

b) you have **** recall

c) you're a chronic liar


 

*Huey » 16 Mar 2025, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 4:15 pm

LMAO!  Your answer was given.  You ran, as expected cowardly too far.  The record is clear on who is lying.  You lied about the context of your cherry picked quote and refuse to post a link.  A sing of a zero integrity cowardly POS.

It is correct, POS

Another diversion.  Run daddy;'soil ******, run.  You say "sniffle...sniffle..I had options".  LMAO!

Another diversion. Run daddy;'soil ******, run. You say "sniffle...sniffle..I had options". LMAO!

another asskicking...

Something to think about during your retreat.

Blackvegetable » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

16 minutes ago

But you won't  post it.

You won't because you know you didn't answer the question, you responded wirh a narrative. It would be inconvenient for you given your performance on the other thread today where you lied about me answering your question.

No....you just made up a story for which you aren't providing any evidence. 

no one has reason to believe it because

a) it makes no sense

b) you have **** recall

c) you're a chronic liar

Options ******, it was given twice.  Run little ******, run. 

Blackvegetable » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

20 minutes ago

another asskicking...

Something to think about during your retreat.

There is no context, real or imagined, where you can kick my ***.  ;)

Blackvegetable » Today, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:04 pm

another asskicking...

Something to think about during your retreat.

Lying *** child molesting cock sucker!

FEDERAL DEFINITION OF A MACHINE GUN

For purposes of federal law, a “machinegun” is defined as:“[A]ny weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically....

You should just stop.  This embarrassing for you

No where in that description (ATF web page) is the word automatic used.

This is like shootin' fish in a barrel with Sporter.  Too Easy!

 

Just killing time waiting for you to whelp another abortion.

Finally. Something original. Lame, but at least you made an effort

Then get on with it

 Get on with what? 



 

Blackvegetable » 25 Mar 2025, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2025, 10:19 am

Finally. Something original. Lame, but at least you made an effort

 Get on with what? 

  He continues to prove me right - copies me. Hence, no thoughts of his own. 

1. Continue to prove me right.