Blackvegetable » 15 Mar 2025, 3:58 pm » wrote: ↑
The context of your declaration that context is irrelevant...
You're actually this stone stupid.
You're lying....
I'm doing so every time you respond.
Vocabulary in any language does one thing, interprets living among the population alive evolving individually daily here since day conceived. Ancestry is the history of genetic lineage so far wrapped in chromosomes of directly linked ancestor inhabiting space each rotation of the planet perpetually balancing outcomes apart 3rd rock from the star specifically in this galaxy.Blackvegetable » 15 Mar 2025, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
Do these words not mean what anyone would reasonably conclude they mean?
you a ninja warrior in your own mind, brown?Blackvegetable » 15 Mar 2025, 4:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Someone paid for someone to spend a week teaching you "hand to hand combat", and to train you to kill at a safe distance with a firearm.
I trained to do so at arms length or less, with my bare hands.....for a decade......with someone who has killed people with his bare hands.....in a war....not a simulated LZ.
I've seen your photo.....I'd be ashamed to look like that at MY age
Blackvegetable » 15 Mar 2025, 4:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Someone paid for someone to spend a week teaching you "hand to hand combat", and to train you to kill at a safe distance with a firearm.
I trained to do so at arms length or less, with my bare hands.....for a decade......with someone who has killed people with his bare hands.....in a war....not a simulated LZ.
I've seen your photo.....I'd be ashamed to look like that at MY age
Blackvegetable » 15 Mar 2025, 4:29 pm » wrote: ↑ You're not waiting for anything....
Unless you are going to tell me that context is relevant.
brown, your schtick's as stale as yer breath...
If you're busy it's cause your sucking a dick with your ***. ***.
Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑ It is supported by a verbatim quote, which you acknowledge is accurate.
You've got bupkis.
Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
It is your declaration that context is "irrelevant".
Is it false?
Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 5:02 pm » wrote: ↑ But you won't post it.
You won't because you know you didn't answer the question, you responded wirh a narrative. It would be inconvenient for you given your performance on the other thread today where you lied about me answering your question.
No....you just made up a story for which you aren't providing any evidence.
no one has reason to believe it because
a) it makes no sense
b) you have **** recall
c) you're a chronic liar
Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑ another asskicking...
Something to think about during your retreat.
Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑ another asskicking...
Something to think about during your retreat.
Turns it on me. Still no thoughts. More of the same. Redundancy.
1. Your OP/Claim, your job.
2. I will not entertain your stalking
3. If I am a moron, then you lost 7 times to one, so what does that make you?
4. Hides.
5. Mistake vs Lie/ Prove you answered it the first time/ "not a penny" LIE LIE LIE!
6. **** your questions/demands , or 3k greenies.
7. Biden's survivorship bias skewed the "net" result.
8. Level 0
9. Still no thoughts
10. Video
11. Hides behind copy/pasted ****. Still no intelligent thoughts.
12. Evades.
13. Turns it around on me/others.
14. Projecting
15. lie
16. back to the same script again. You know, studies show that highly repetitive people tend to have lower IQs because they struggle with original thought.