Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 12:30 pm

If "context is irrelevant", why are you demanding context?

and another question.  You quoted the answer.  Now you are just being his honest.

Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 2:28 pm

No I didn't, lying little ****...

You certainly did, Meltdown Mary.

Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 2:28 pm

No I didn't, lying little ****...

You didn't quote, Meltdown Mary.  You ran from it.  You not replying to a post is a concession that is correct.

This is what I told your buddy and which is similar to the post your ran from:

Hey, that has already explained.  He lifted comment from quote made a few years back.  He twisted another quote and said it was the context.  It wasn't.  In that particular instance his "context" was not relevant because it was out of context.

But, Botched Abortion has never been honest.  Notice he rarely uses links when he plays this game.

 

Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 2:32 pm

Tiny,

That's quite revealing...

But, if true, why not say "you've taken it out of context." 

Or "you've misrepresented the context".

"Your context is irrelevant." sounds like YOU were caught quoting out of context, and when busted wanted to claim that your lie was true REGARDLESS of context.

And everyone knows you lie, all the time.

As usual, you lose.  Just post the link, ArmsLength.  You are not man enough, are you. And you expect me to fear you?  Too funny.  As I said on your thread to your little butt buddy, neither of you would know ruthlessness if it was within arms length.

 

Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 2:32 pm

Then post it.

I did one already.


Waiting on you, lil punk.

Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 2:47 pm

That is neither an answer nor correct.

Go **** yourself you god-damned stinking piece of ****.

BV IS NEVER RIGHT ABOUT ANYTHING

Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 2:46 pm

*Huey » 16 Mar 2025, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 2:34 pm

As usual, you lose.  Just post the link, ArmsLength.  You are not man enough, are you. And you expect me to fear you?  Too funny.  As I said on your thread to your little butt buddy, neither of you would know ruthlessness if it was within arms length.

Notice how quickly you veer from the topic.....into meltdown? 

Why not just acknowledge that you're a lying zerointegrity coward and move on?
 

 

LMAO!  Your answer was given.  You ran, as expected cowardly too far.  The record is clear on who is lying.  You lied about the context of your cherry picked quote and refuse to post a link.  A sing of a zero integrity cowardly POS.

Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 2:47 pm

*Huey » 16 Mar 2025, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 2:35 pm

I did one already.

Waiting on you, lil punk.

That is neither an answer nor correct.



 

 

It is correct, POS

Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 3:03 pm

*Huey » 16 Mar 2025, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 2:35 pm

I did one already.

Waiting on you, lil punk.

While I'm waiting..


Who decides when the U.S. is in a recession? Eight economists who serve on the Business Cycle Dating Committee, within a nonprofit research organization not affiliated with the federal government known as the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), make the call. 
  They are appointed by the NBER president James Poterba, who has held the position since 2008, after consultation with committee chairs and the nonprofit’s board of directors. 


https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/20 ... 233383007/



Don't you hate it when I'm always right?

 

Another diversion.  Run daddy;'soil ******, run.  You say "sniffle...sniffle..I had options".  LMAO!

Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 5:02 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 5:02 pm

But you won't  post it.

You won't because you know you didn't answer the question, you responded wirh a narrative. It would be inconvenient for you given your performance on the other thread today where you lied about me answering your question.

No....you just made up a story for which you aren't providing any evidence. 

no one has reason to believe it because

a) it makes no sense

b) you have **** recall

c) you're a chronic liar

Options ******, it was given twice.  Run little ******, run. 

Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 5:04 pm

another asskicking...

Something to think about during your retreat.

There is no context, real or imagined, where you can kick my ***.  ;)

Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 5:04 pm

another asskicking...

Something to think about during your retreat.

Lying *** child molesting cock sucker!

Blackvegetable » 25 Mar 2025, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2025, 10:19 am

Finally. Something original. Lame, but at least you made an effort

 Get on with what? 

  He continues to prove me right - copies me. Hence, no thoughts of his own. 

1. Continue to prove me right. 

Blackvegetable » 25 Mar 2025, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2025, 10:31 am

Post the thread title.

Turns it on me. Still no thoughts. More of the same. Redundancy. 

Previously on Veghead: Literally the Same Thing: 

1, 4, 13

1. Your OP/Claim, your job.
2. I will not entertain your stalking
3. If I am a moron, then you lost 7 times to one, so what does that make you?
4. Hides.
5. Mistake vs Lie/ Prove you answered it the first time/ "not a penny" LIE LIE LIE!
6. **** your questions/demands , or 3k greenies.
7. Biden's survivorship bias skewed the "net" result.
8. Level 0
9. Still no thoughts
10. Video
11. Hides behind copy/pasted ****. Still no intelligent thoughts.
12. Evades.
13. Turns it around on me/others.
14. Projecting
15. lie
16. back to the same script again. You know, studies show that highly repetitive people tend to have lower IQs because they struggle with original thought.

Blackvegetable » 25 Mar 2025, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2025, 10:31 am

Post the thread title.

Previously on Veghead: Literally the Same Thing: 
1, 4, 9. 13

1. Your OP/Claim, your job.
2. I will not entertain your stalking
3. If I am a moron, then you lost 7 times to one, so what does that make you?
4. Hides.
5. Mistake vs Lie/ Prove you answered it the first time/ "not a penny" LIE LIE LIE!
6. **** your questions/demands , or 3k greenies.
7. Biden's survivorship bias skewed the "net" result.
8. Level 0
9. Still no thoughts
10. Video
11. Hides behind copy/pasted ****. Still no intelligent thoughts.
12. Evades.
13. Turns it around on me/others.
14. Projecting
15. lie
16. back to the same script again. You know, studies show that highly repetitive people tend to have lower IQs because they struggle with original thought.

Blackvegetable » 16 Mar 2025, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 2:46 pm

Notice how quickly you veer from the topic.....into meltdown? 

Why not just acknowledge that you're a lying zerointegrity coward and move on?
 

Topics of anything is possible debating issues of how to deal with persons not joining people decided to ignore now is eternity as genetically existing timed apart as evolving in series parallel positions of ancestry here one at a time, now.

Reality is stages of people agreeing to disagree now is eternity through mythology, theology, scientology, economic symbolism over substance mind control of every brain alive adapting to the moment here native to this universal location since conceived in the previous 350 generation gaps journaled on how to save humanity with everyone believing nobody can understand limited time adapting uniquely alive so far.

31stArrival » 25 Mar 2025, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2025, 12:35 pm

Topics of anything is possible debating issues of how to deal with persons not joining people decided to ignore now is eternity as genetically existing timed apart as evolving in series parallel positions of ancestry here one at a time, now.

Reality is stages of people agreeing to disagree now is eternity through mythology, theology, scientology, economic symbolism over substance mind control of every brain alive adapting to the moment here native to this universal location since conceived in the previous 350 generation gaps journaled on how to save humanity with everyone believing nobody can understand limited time adapting uniquely alive so far.

Lol, the babble spew strikes again!

murdock » 27 Mar 2025, 4:13 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Mar 2025, 4:13 pm

Lol, the babble spew strikes again!

I don't strike, I explain self evident evolving as it actually exists daily here for anyone uniquely alive now.

Oops, I didn't pay attention these posts were put in peanut gallery.

Blackvegetable » 09 Apr 2025, 10:10 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Apr 2025, 10:10 pm

yes I do. Every word in any language is used to deny why life is self evident time alive since individually conceived to replace previous 4 generation gaps lived in series parallel sequence in plain sight so far.

when someone enables peanut gallery in no holds barred, those enabling it cannot win the argument in no holds barred. I never win against absolute corruption, but I can break even every time my posts end up in peanut gallery or banned from a thread suggesting life isn't self evident time adapting in plain sight narratives.

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 10:02 am

Unlike those of Solomon, the mines of liberalforum.net yield not treasures of the material sort, but as a compendium of American Stupid it is the Franklin Mint (assuming, of course, that the Franklin Mint was an actual mint).

It would be a disservice to future generations, puzzling over a people's eagerness to hand their shiny toy to a tantrum prone imbecile bubble boy, were we to fail to paint the portrait of "America - 2025".

Let this gallery stand in mute celebration of the National Rube.

I invite people to guess at the authors of the idiocies below.

Name that moron? Ok, it's ***. You. **** you child molester.

Blackvegetable » 15 Mar 2025, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Mar 2025, 3:01 pm

Your context is irrelevant.

Is it not?

Post the link!