Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 01 May 2025, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑

01 May 2025, 9:21 am

Talk to the Village..

Doesn’t Hillary run the village?

*Huey » 16 Mar 2025, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Mar 2025, 2:34 pm

As usual, you lose.  Just post the link, ArmsLength.  You are not man enough, are you. And you expect me to fear you?  Too funny.  As I said on your thread to your little butt buddy, neither of you would know ruthlessness if it was within arms length.

 

you cannot see ruthlessness to your own behavior saving your social consensus over understanding life in actual position of equally alive now as the lowest form of life today, native to this atmosphere past and current events.

Intellectual chronological time indexing every detail throughout history by local areas in this atmosphere doesn't change results are limited to evolving in series parallel time each rotation of this planet perpetually balancing in this solar system forward.

circle of life includes all cycles lived and living forward so far. Simple compounding chromosomes. Use the rule of 72 in economics to figure it out since it works inverted to genetic additions of ancestry each great great grandchild forward.

Blackvegetable » 25 Mar 2025, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2025, 10:19 am

Finally. Something original. Lame, but at least you made an effort

 Get on with what? 

**** you lying traitor ***

Blackvegetable » 25 Mar 2025, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2025, 10:31 am

Post the thread title.

Thread title? Ok. Here ya go:

"Bv sucks another horse cock! Live, from New York!"
 

Blackvegetable » 01 May 2025, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

01 May 2025, 8:26 am

Did you guess the moron?

I did, It's you, ***.

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 10:02 am

Unlike those of Solomon, the mines of liberalforum.net yield not treasures of the material sort, but as a compendium of American Stupid it is the Franklin Mint (assuming, of course, that the Franklin Mint was an actual mint).

It would be a disservice to future generations, puzzling over a people's eagerness to hand their shiny toy to a tantrum prone imbecile bubble boy, were we to fail to paint the portrait of "America - 2025".

Let this gallery stand in mute celebration of the National Rube.

I invite people to guess at the authors of the idiocies below.

Why you hiding behind PG, ******?  Did your daughter see this hypocrisy?

31stArrival » 01 May 2025, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

01 May 2025, 9:40 am

you cannot see ruthlessness to your own behavior saving your social consensus over understanding life in actual position of equally alive now as the lowest form of life today, native to this atmosphere past and current events.

Intellectual chronological time indexing every detail throughout history by local areas in this atmosphere doesn't change results are limited to evolving in series parallel time each rotation of this planet perpetually balancing in this solar system forward.

circle of life includes all cycles lived and living forward so far. Simple compounding chromosomes. Use the rule of 72 in economics to figure it out since it works inverted to genetic additions of ancestry each great great grandchild forward.

**** off you **** spewing ****!

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:31 pm

Dumb ****,

I said it in reference to the NATO 5.56.

You did it again. As always, you refuse to answer questions while demanding yours gets answered


Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:31 pm

Dumb ****,

I said in reference to the NATO 5.56.

No you didn't.  Here is what you were asked:

*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480

Just applying your logic.

You said LIKE THE COLT AR 15, ya lying lil bitch.  
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:38 pm

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:35 pm

No you didn't.  Here is what you were asked:



 

I don't answer to your interpretations or retellings.

 

And I laugh at your lies, ****.  And you just got cut in a big one.

It is a matter of record with the **** link.  Keep lying ****.  Has not been a good time for you on this forum.

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:38 pm

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:35 pm

No you didn't.  Here is what you were asked:

*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480

Just applying your logic.

You said LIKE THE COLT AR 15, ya lying lil bitch.  

 

I don't answer to your interpretations or retellings.

 

You **** ******.  You respond, move my post to PG, and edit it as well.  That is a ****** move.  You can PG it all day.  I will returning it here.  
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:38 pm

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:35 pm

No you didn't.  Here is what you were asked:



 

I don't answer to your interpretations or retellings.

 

No you didn't.  Here is what you were asked:

*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

BV's reply:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480

Just applying your logic.

You said LIKE THE COLT AR 15, ya lying lil bitch.  


BV claimed he was talking about NATO 5.56.  Lied his *** off than he PG'd the post with this info.  What a ****** move.  He ain't ****.

Dumb ****,

I said it in reference to the NATO 5.56.


viewtopic.php?p=2766018#p2766018

I started a thread so I can remind you of your massive lie, ******.  Is it the dope or are you really this **** stupid?  

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 10:02 am

Unlike those of Solomon, the mines of liberalforum.net yield not treasures of the material sort, but as a compendium of American Stupid it is the Franklin Mint (assuming, of course, that the Franklin Mint was an actual mint).

It would be a disservice to future generations, puzzling over a people's eagerness to hand their shiny toy to a tantrum prone imbecile bubble boy, were we to fail to paint the portrait of "America - 2025".

Let this gallery stand in mute celebration of the National Rube.

I invite people to guess at the authors of the idiocies below.

Someone gave you 100 greenies...you'll never guess his name.  "Ro"sham"bo"

I wonder who the alias is?      
 
P.S.  Looks like CP is one of his buddies.     

roadkill » 14 Aug 2025, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 9:24 am

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 10:02 am

Unlike those of Solomon, the mines of liberalforum.net yield not treasures of the material sort, but as a compendium of American Stupid it is the Franklin Mint (assuming, of course, that the Franklin Mint was an actual mint).

It would be a disservice to future generations, puzzling over a people's eagerness to hand their shiny toy to a tantrum prone imbecile bubble boy, were we to fail to paint the portrait of "America - 2025".

Let this gallery stand in mute celebration of the National Rube.

I invite people to guess at the authors of the idiocies below.

Someone gave you 100 greenies...you'll never guess his name.  "Ro"sham"bo"

I wonder who the alias is?      
 

 

In his profile he/she has a rank moderator.  

Blackvegetable » 01 May 2025, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

01 May 2025, 8:26 am

Did you guess the moron?

Yes. It was easy. He goes by Blackvegetable. 

 

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 10:04 am

I'm experiencing no difficulty at all "smashing" you.

Oh please show us. Let's see this. 

All we see from you is "you are a **** moron." Level 0 responses. 

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 10:04 am

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 9:33 am

He uncovers this thread when he is having difficult days on the forum.

I'm experiencing no difficulty at all "smashing" you.

 

 

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 10:06 am

BuckNaked » 14 Aug 2025, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 8:47 am

I did not

You know what they say about the @*pigeon at the table...

 

Hey, did you hear?  NC may become the 30 Constitutional Carry state.  Just like your home state of NH. 

https://www.buckeyefirearms.org/will-no ... onal-carry

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 9:28 am

In his profile he/she has a rank moderator.

I saw that.

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 10:06 am

BuckNaked » 14 Aug 2025, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 8:47 am

I did not

You know what they say about the @*pigeon at the table...

 

     

Seems someone is hiding behind PG.

I guess you won't be screeching about again.