Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 1:55 pm

The subject, as always, is "Vegas is soooo **** stupid that......"

Nod.

Ah yes, the intellectual equivalent of throwing your controller at the screen when you keep losing. ‘You're stupid’ isn’t an argument, it’s just the last words of a man who ran out of anything remotely resembling a point. Try again, but this time with effort.

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 12:30 pm

So **** g'ddammned stupid

A non-collaborative single source society page story....who knew?
 

Vegas » 05 Mar 2025, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 1:59 pm

Ah yes, the intellectual equivalent of throwing your controller at the screen when you keep losing. ‘You're stupid’ isn’t an argument, it’s just the last words of a man who ran out of anything remotely resembling a point. Try again, but this time with effort.

No...the truth...

You wanna see some evidence?
 

Vegas » 05 Mar 2025, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 1:40 pm

Ah yes, ‘attributed’—a magical word that, in your hands, means ‘I refuse to admit I’m wrong, so I’ll dress up my nonsense in a tuxedo and hope no one notices it’s still nonsense.’ Keep digging, champ. At this rate, you’ll strike oil before you strike a valid point

yep...a pig with lipstick...a polished turd...
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 2:00 pm

No...the truth...

You wanna see some evidence?

Whatever evidence you have will never come close to the eye color.

Besides, you never comment on your links. You do the "**** writes itself" move, which just means you have no thoughts. 

ROG62 » 05 Mar 2025, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 2:01 pm

yep...a pig with lipstick...a polished turd...

I don't know why he even tries with me. He gets nuked every time. 

Vegas » 05 Mar 2025, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 2:02 pm

Whatever evidence you have will never come close to the eye color.

Besides, you never comment on your links. You do the "**** writes itself" move, which just means you have no thoughts.

Take that up with @Cedar  ....you wanna see evidence that you're a moron 
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 2:06 pm

Take that up with @Cedar  ....you wanna see evidence that you're a moron

Now he deflects again. QED. 

never any intelligent thoughts of his own. Always turning it around on someone else. 

Vegas » 05 Mar 2025, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 2:07 pm

Now he deflects again. QED. 

never any intelligent thoughts of his own. Always turning it around on someone else.

Here's evidence that you're a moron..

Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period

Who could possibly be this **** stupid? 

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 2:09 pm

Here's evidence that you're a moron..

Who could possibly be this **** stupid?

So rebut it then. "so **** stupid" is not a rebuttal. 

Your "**** writes itself" does not work. How many **** times....

Vegas » 05 Mar 2025, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 2:10 pm

So rebut it then. "so **** stupid" is not a rebuttal. 

Your "**** writes itself" does not work. How many **** times....

The moron responsible for this doesn't understand the concept of "net".


That's a real moron.

Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 2:12 pm

The moron responsible for this doesn't understand the concept of "net".

That's a real moron.

One more **** time: REBUT IT!

You are not giving an argument. God man. How many **** times....how many?


1. He still won't refute it. Same insult. 

Vegas » 05 Mar 2025, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 2:14 pm

One more **** time: REBUT IT!

You are not giving an argument. God man. How many **** times....how many?

1. He still won't refute it. Same insult.

There's no obligation to rebut something manifestly idiotic.....unless you are talking to a moron.

 

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 2:16 pm

There's no obligation to rebut something manifestly idiotic.....unless you are talking to a moron.

          And there it is. 100% accuracy. QED. 


 

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 2:16 pm

There's no obligation to rebut something manifestly idiotic.....unless you are talking to a moron.

**** you ya goddamned *** traitor.

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2025, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2025, 2:16 pm

There's no obligation to rebut something manifestly idiotic.....unless you are talking to a moron.

^^^ **** ******...