Liberal Forum

Vegas » 46 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

46 minutes ago

The level of stupidity is nothing less than remarkable.

Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period


so **** g'ddammned stupid 

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period

so **** g'ddammned stupid

Yet, you refuse to debunk it. And no. "**** writes itself" is not an argument. 

1. You will continue to copy/paste the same quote while refusing to debunk it with your own thoughts.
2. And of course, as always, a copout is coming. Something like "there is nothing to debunk, it's so **** stupid."

As always. 

Vegas » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Yet, you refuse to debunk it. And no. "**** writes itself" is not an argument. 

1. You will continue to copy/paste the same quote while refusing to debunk it with your own thoughts.
2. And of course, as always, a copout is coming. Something like "there is nothing to debunk, it's so **** stupid."

As always.

CP'sbattereduvula did a superb job demonstrating what a bleating imbecile you are...

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

CP'sbattereduvula did a superb job demonstrating what a bleating imbecile you are...

I don't recall that. Show me. And there you again, you hide behind someone else instead of having the balls to come up with your own words.

Vegas » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

I don't recall that. Show me. And there you again, you hide behind someone else instead of having the balls to come up with your own words.

Damn, are you a stupid ****.

Blackvegetable » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

You're a **** idiot.

"The eyes" was @Cedar  's first pathetic effort to debunk.

Nod.
 

 

Your recall sucks.  I brought up both.  No go away and let the adults and real men talk.  

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Damn, are you a stupid ****.

     I see I have beat your *** again. 

I am going to do a tribute thread to you on this. We both know how you love being humiliated publicly, so hang on, give me a few minutes. 

*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Your recall sucks.  I brought up both.  No go away and let the adults and real men talk.

It's not about you, Idiot.

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

It's not about you, Idiot.

 

Dishonest ******, you made it about me when you jumped into my conversation.

Now get your binky and tissues and go cry about what you started.

Vegas » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

     I see I have beat your *** again. 

I am going to do a tribute thread to you on this. We both know how you love being humiliated publicly, so hang on, give me a few minutes.

viewtopic.php?p=2639502#p2639502

*Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Dishonest ******, you made it about me when you jumped into my conversation.

Now get your binky and tissues and go cry about what you started.

Your conversation about what?

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Your conversation about what?

I see a question.  Once you tell me what time The FIVE airs on the East Coast I will answer.  

*Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

I see a question.  Once you tell me what time The FIVE airs on the East Coast I will answer.

:rofl:  
 

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

viewtopic.php?p=2639502#p2639502

Didn't click it. I will not entertain your stalking. 

1. "Even you won't read..." I will not entertain....


Loop. A forever loop. Same old ****. 100% accuracy.
ClickUp - The Everything App for Work

Vegas » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Didn't click it. I will not entertain your stalking. 

1. "Even you won't read..." I will not entertain....

Loop. A forever loop. Same old ****. 100% accuracy.

 

:die:  

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

 

Where's my money?

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

Where's my money?

Where is my evidence? Welcher. Broken record from the narcissist. As always. 


 A challenge for BV. @Cannonpointer  though we both know he will not accept, but just in case the planets happen to be aligned to induce an anomaly, would you mind modding?
The stakes.
If I lose, then I am permanently banned. If he loses then he is banned for a month. 

What a deal!
Ladies and gentlemen, longtime forum warriors, and admirers of Olympic-level debate dodging,

We are gathered here today to honor a true forum legend. A man who has spent years perfecting the fine art of copy-pasting, cherry-picking, dodging direct challenges, and calling people stupid as his only counterargument. Yes, I am, of course, talking about @Blackvegetable  , the grandmaster of quoting without comprehension.
 In his honor, I am issuing a simple challenge that he will, without question, refuse to accept.Below is my full statement on job creation:

Survivorship bias example: The numbers from the senile pedo (Biden) and the ho didn't reflect the gross, only the net job creation. Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period or workers who exited the labor market entirely. Some industries have experienced significant job losses that are overshadowed by growth in other areas. AI being one example of the growth that overshadowed the loss of manufacturing jobs. However, only the AI jobs were counted, while not accounting for the loss of manufacturing jobs. That's just one example that happened under the senile pedo and the Ho. A focus on job creation without accounting for the quality or sustainability of these jobs skews the perception of the labor market's true health.

 Now, here’s the challenge for Veghead

1. Debunk it in your own words. No copy-pasting, no link dumps. Just an actual, reasoned response.
2. No cherry-picking. Address the entire statement, not just one sentence out of context.
3. No insults as a replacement for an argument. If “so stupid” is your best response, you’ve already lost.
4. Explain why my analysis is wrong. If net job numbers are an accurate reflection of job creation, prove it. If AI job growth doesn't overshadow manufacturing losses, explain why.

This should be easy if my statement is as wrong as he claims. So, what will it be? Will the Copy-Paste King finally step up and offer an actual argument, or will he do what we all expect—dodge, cherry-pick, and post another quote with an insult?We all know the answer, but hey, let’s give him a chance to prove us wrong.

Blackvegetable » Today, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:15 am

is that your "My Little Pony", brown? problem being, brown, is I doubt you could even ride it since you can barely reach the saddle...
 

Vegas » Today, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:13 am

I **** you not, he told me they are the same because they have the same eye color. No really. He really is that stupid. 

He will deny it, but I have his words. He phrased it in a question of course. That's his M.O. Always hiding behind incessant questions. Questions after questions, he hides. 

@Blackvegetable

Oh, I know...I saw it... I believe one of his questions was "what makes you shoulder height triangulation experts."   

now he falls on "it's attributed" to an unverifiable single source....