ROG62 » 07 Mar 2025, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh, I know...I saw it... I believe one of his questions was "what makes you shoulder height triangulation experts."![]()
now he falls on "it's attributed" to an unverifiable single source....
and I hope I never do...Vegas » 07 Mar 2025, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑ The level of stupid. Seriously, have you ever come across that level of mindless drivel knowing that the person wasn't even joking?
Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same periodVegas » 07 Mar 2025, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑ The level of stupid. Seriously, have you ever come across that level of mindless drivel knowing that the person wasn't even joking?
Blackvegetable » 08 Mar 2025, 7:09 am » wrote: ↑ Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period
******* to the max.
As thoroughly debunked as your media comment.Vegas » 08 Mar 2025, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑![]()
Damn. You really can't refute this, can you?
Challenge. Cannon judges. Nobody cares that you think he has syphilis.
Completely and utterly, for all time.Vegas » 09 Mar 2025, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Neither has been debunked.
You proved my example...unintentionally.
As you would say: So goddamn **** stupid.
Already done.Vegas » 09 Mar 2025, 5:45 pm » wrote: ↑ What is survivorship bias? Your words only without my help.
Now that you proved my first example, let's see you skin yourself on the second one.
Lie
Nope. You demonstrated that I was right...unintentionally. Because you are a moron.I've demonstrated that your first example isn't.
I would love for you to humiliate yourself further. Do it.I can, of course, humiliate you further.
Vegas » 09 Mar 2025, 8:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Lie
Nope. You demonstrated that I was right...unintentionally. Because you are a moron.
I would love for you to humiliate yourself further. Do it.
Lie.Nope. You demonstrated that I was right...unintentionally. Because you are a moron.
Does this drivel refer to the Household, or Establishment, survey?I would love for you to humiliate yourself further. Do it.
Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period
Already answered in the whole example that you didn't read. Once again, you make an *** out of yourself for not reading.Blackvegetable » 09 Mar 2025, 8:23 pm » wrote: ↑
Lie.
Does this drivel refer to the Household, or Establishment, survey?