ROG62 » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Oh, I know...I saw it... I believe one of his questions was "what makes you shoulder height triangulation experts."![]()
now he falls on "it's attributed" to an unverifiable single source....
and I hope I never do...Vegas » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The level of stupid. Seriously, have you ever come across that level of mindless drivel knowing that the person wasn't even joking?
Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same periodVegas » Yesterday, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑ The level of stupid. Seriously, have you ever come across that level of mindless drivel knowing that the person wasn't even joking?
Blackvegetable » Today, 7:09 am » wrote: ↑ Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period
******* to the max.
As thoroughly debunked as your media comment.Vegas » Today, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑![]()
Damn. You really can't refute this, can you?
Challenge. Cannon judges. Nobody cares that you think he has syphilis.
Completely and utterly, for all time.Vegas » Today, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Neither has been debunked.
You proved my example...unintentionally.
As you would say: So goddamn **** stupid.