Liberal Forum

Funny art from Ukraine....  

Another Proxy....DRAINED and kicked to the curb...for EMPIRE.  Essssh.

Id prefer MUCH bigger tits though.  


 

Blackvegetable » 07 Mar 2025, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2025, 10:21 am

See something you think you recognize, Short Eyes?

Size 6 deck shoes?

Blackvegetable » 07 Mar 2025, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2025, 10:17 am

Inflation is now patriotic...

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent staunchly defended President Trump’s tariffs on Thursday, arguing that trade policy should focus less on getting the lowest possible prices and more on putting America first.

 “Access to cheap goods is not the essence of the American dream,” Bessent said during a speech to the Economic Club of New York. “The American Dream is rooted in the concept that any citizen can achieve prosperity, upward mobility, and economic security. For too long, the designers of multilateral trade deals have lost sight of this.”

https://nypost.com/2025/03/06/business/ ... ica-first/

Less is more, Children.

MORE MADE IN THE USA is MORE, dicksuck!!

LESS cheap China **** is FAR better for this nation than anything you can spew out!!

Next you're going to tell us AGAIN how tariffs alone are the cause of inflation when I BITCH SLAPPED THAT CUM TASTE OUT OF YOUR MOUTH on that one already on another thread!!

*Beekeeper » 07 Mar 2025, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2025, 12:55 pm

MORE MADE IN THE USA is MORE, dicksuck!!

LESS cheap China **** is FAR better for this nation than anything you can spew out!!

Next you're going to tell us AGAIN how tariffs alone are the cause of inflation when I BITCH SLAPPED THAT CUM TASTE OUT OF YOUR MOUTH on that one already on another thread!!

Next you're going to tell us AGAIN how tariffs alone

That's now between you and the Federal Reserve of Boston. I'm reasonably certain they're credentialed economists.

You fathered ugly children.

Blackvegetable » 07 Mar 2025, 6:58 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2025, 6:58 am

My cowardice is unprecedented. 

 A challenge for BV. @Cannonpointer  though we both know he will not accept, but just in case the planets happen to be aligned to induce an anomaly, would you mind modding?
The stakes.
If I lose, then I am permanently banned. If he loses then he is banned for a month. 

What a deal!
Ladies and gentlemen, longtime forum warriors, and admirers of Olympic-level debate dodging,

We are gathered here today to honor a true forum legend. A man who has spent years perfecting the fine art of copy-pasting, cherry-picking, dodging direct challenges, and calling people stupid as his only counterargument. Yes, I am, of course, talking about @Blackvegetable  , the grandmaster of quoting without comprehension.
 In his honor, I am issuing a simple challenge that he will, without question, refuse to accept.Below is my full statement on job creation:

Survivorship bias example: The numbers from the senile pedo (Biden) and the ho didn't reflect the gross, only the net job creation. Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period or workers who exited the labor market entirely. Some industries have experienced significant job losses that are overshadowed by growth in other areas. AI being one example of the growth that overshadowed the loss of manufacturing jobs. However, only the AI jobs were counted, while not accounting for the loss of manufacturing jobs. That's just one example that happened under the senile pedo and the Ho. A focus on job creation without accounting for the quality or sustainability of these jobs skews the perception of the labor market's true health.

 Now, here’s the challenge for Veghead

1. Debunk it in your own words. No copy-pasting, no link dumps. Just an actual, reasoned response.
2. No cherry-picking. Address the entire statement, not just one sentence out of context.
3. No insults as a replacement for an argument. If “so stupid” is your best response, you’ve already lost.
4. Explain why my analysis is wrong. If net job numbers are an accurate reflection of job creation, prove it. If AI job growth doesn't overshadow manufacturing losses, explain why.

This should be easy if my statement is as wrong as he claims. So, what will it be? Will the Copy-Paste King finally step up and offer an actual argument, or will he do what we all expect—dodge, cherry-pick, and post another quote with an insult?We all know the answer, but hey, let’s give him a chance to prove us wrong.

Blackvegetable » 07 Mar 2025, 6:58 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2025, 6:58 am

I am an irreversible coward. 

 A challenge for BV. 
The stakes.
If I lose, then I am permanently banned. If he loses then he is banned for a month. 

What a deal!

Ladies and gentlemen, longtime forum warriors, and admirers of Olympic-level debate dodging,

We are gathered here today to honor a true forum legend. A man who has spent years perfecting the fine art of copy-pasting, cherry-picking, dodging direct challenges, and calling people stupid as his only counterargument. Yes, I am, of course, talking about @Blackvegetable  , the grandmaster of quoting without comprehension.
 In his honor, I am issuing a simple challenge that he will, without question, refuse to accept. Below is my full statement on job creation:

Survivorship bias example: The numbers from the senile pedo (Biden) and the ho didn't reflect the gross, only the net job creation. Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period or workers who exited the labor market entirely. Some industries have experienced significant job losses that are overshadowed by growth in other areas. AI being one example of the growth that overshadowed the loss of manufacturing jobs. However, only the AI jobs were counted, while not accounting for the loss of manufacturing jobs. That's just one example that happened under the senile pedo and the Ho. A focus on job creation without accounting for the quality or sustainability of these jobs skews the perception of the labor market's true health.

 Now, here’s the challenge for Veghead

1. Debunk it in your own words. No copy-pasting, no link dumps. Just an actual, reasoned response.
2. No cherry-picking. Address the entire statement, not just one sentence out of context.
3. No insults as a replacement for an argument. If “so stupid” is your best response, you’ve already lost.
4. Explain why my analysis is wrong. If net job numbers are an accurate reflection of job creation, prove it. If AI job growth doesn't overshadow manufacturing losses, explain why.

This should be easy if my statement is as wrong as he claims. So, what will it be? Will the Copy-Paste King finally step up and offer an actual argument, or will he do what we all expect—dodge, cherry-pick, and post another quote with an insult? We all know the answer, but hey, let’s give him a chance to prove us wrong.

Vegas » 07 Mar 2025, 1:28 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2025, 1:28 pm

 A challenge for BV. @Cannonpointer  though we both know he will not accept, but just in case the planets happen to be aligned to induce an anomaly, would you mind modding?
The stakes.
If I lose, then I am permanently banned. If he loses then he is banned for a month. 

What a deal!
Ladies and gentlemen, longtime forum warriors, and admirers of Olympic-level debate dodging,

We are gathered here today to honor a true forum legend. A man who has spent years perfecting the fine art of copy-pasting, cherry-picking, dodging direct challenges, and calling people stupid as his only counterargument. Yes, I am, of course, talking about @Blackvegetable  , the grandmaster of quoting without comprehension.
 In his honor, I am issuing a simple challenge that he will, without question, refuse to accept.Below is my full statement on job creation:

 Now, here’s the challenge for Veghead

1. Debunk it in your own words. No copy-pasting, no link dumps. Just an actual, reasoned response.
2. No cherry-picking. Address the entire statement, not just one sentence out of context.
3. No insults as a replacement for an argument. If “so stupid” is your best response, you’ve already lost.
4. Explain why my analysis is wrong. If net job numbers are an accurate reflection of job creation, prove it. If AI job growth doesn't overshadow manufacturing losses, explain why.

This should be easy if my statement is as wrong as he claims. So, what will it be? Will the Copy-Paste King finally step up and offer an actual argument, or will he do what we all expect—dodge, cherry-pick, and post another quote with an insult?We all know the answer, but hey, let’s give him a chance to prove us wrong.

Where's my 60k?

Blackvegetable » 07 Mar 2025, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2025, 1:48 pm

Where's my 60k?

Where is my evidence? Welcher. 




 A challenge for BV. @Cannonpointer  though we both know he will not accept, but just in case the planets happen to be aligned to induce an anomaly, would you mind modding?
The stakes.
If I lose, then I am permanently banned. If he loses then he is banned for a month. 

What a deal!
Ladies and gentlemen, longtime forum warriors, and admirers of Olympic-level debate dodging,

We are gathered here today to honor a true forum legend. A man who has spent years perfecting the fine art of copy-pasting, cherry-picking, dodging direct challenges, and calling people stupid as his only counterargument. Yes, I am, of course, talking about @Blackvegetable  , the grandmaster of quoting without comprehension.
 In his honor, I am issuing a simple challenge that he will, without question, refuse to accept.Below is my full statement on job creation:

Survivorship bias example: The numbers from the senile pedo (Biden) and the ho didn't reflect the gross, only the net job creation. Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period or workers who exited the labor market entirely. Some industries have experienced significant job losses that are overshadowed by growth in other areas. AI being one example of the growth that overshadowed the loss of manufacturing jobs. However, only the AI jobs were counted, while not accounting for the loss of manufacturing jobs. That's just one example that happened under the senile pedo and the Ho. A focus on job creation without accounting for the quality or sustainability of these jobs skews the perception of the labor market's true health.

 Now, here’s the challenge for Veghead

1. Debunk it in your own words. No copy-pasting, no link dumps. Just an actual, reasoned response.
2. No cherry-picking. Address the entire statement, not just one sentence out of context.
3. No insults as a replacement for an argument. If “so stupid” is your best response, you’ve already lost.
4. Explain why my analysis is wrong. If net job numbers are an accurate reflection of job creation, prove it. If AI job growth doesn't overshadow manufacturing losses, explain why.

This should be easy if my statement is as wrong as he claims. So, what will it be? Will the Copy-Paste King finally step up and offer an actual argument, or will he do what we all expect—dodge, cherry-pick, and post another quote with an insult?We all know the answer, but hey, let’s give him a chance to prove us wrong.

Blackvegetable » 07 Mar 2025, 6:58 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2025, 6:58 am

I hate posting evidence. Therefore, I just prefer to post random irrelevant ****, then pretend I won. 

 A challenge for BV. @Cannonpointer  though we both know he will not accept, but just in case the planets happen to be aligned to induce an anomaly, would you mind modding?
The stakes.
If I lose, then I am permanently banned. If he loses then he is banned for a month. 

What a deal!
Ladies and gentlemen, longtime forum warriors, and admirers of Olympic-level debate dodging,

We are gathered here today to honor a true forum legend. A man who has spent years perfecting the fine art of copy-pasting, cherry-picking, dodging direct challenges, and calling people stupid as his only counterargument. Yes, I am, of course, talking about @Blackvegetable  , the grandmaster of quoting without comprehension.
 In his honor, I am issuing a simple challenge that he will, without question, refuse to accept.Below is my full statement on job creation:

Survivorship bias example: The numbers from the senile pedo (Biden) and the ho didn't reflect the gross, only the net job creation. Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period or workers who exited the labor market entirely. Some industries have experienced significant job losses that are overshadowed by growth in other areas. AI being one example of the growth that overshadowed the loss of manufacturing jobs. However, only the AI jobs were counted, while not accounting for the loss of manufacturing jobs. That's just one example that happened under the senile pedo and the Ho. A focus on job creation without accounting for the quality or sustainability of these jobs skews the perception of the labor market's true health.

 Now, here’s the challenge for Veghead

1. Debunk it in your own words. No copy-pasting, no link dumps. Just an actual, reasoned response.
2. No cherry-picking. Address the entire statement, not just one sentence out of context.
3. No insults as a replacement for an argument. If “so stupid” is your best response, you’ve already lost.
4. Explain why my analysis is wrong. If net job numbers are an accurate reflection of job creation, prove it. If AI job growth doesn't overshadow manufacturing losses, explain why.

This should be easy if my statement is as wrong as he claims. So, what will it be? Will the Copy-Paste King finally step up and offer an actual argument, or will he do what we all expect—dodge, cherry-pick, and post another quote with an insult?We all know the answer, but hey, let’s give him a chance to prove us wrong.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2H6U1MYLtIw

Vegas » 07 Mar 2025, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2025, 1:54 pm

 A challenge for BV. @Cannonpointer  though we both know he will not accept, but just in case the planets happen to be aligned to induce an anomaly, would you mind modding?
The stakes.
If I lose, then I am permanently banned. If he loses then he is banned for a month. 

What a deal!
Ladies and gentlemen, longtime forum warriors, and admirers of Olympic-level debate dodging,

We are gathered here today to honor a true forum legend. A man who has spent years perfecting the fine art of copy-pasting, cherry-picking, dodging direct challenges, and calling people stupid as his only counterargument. Yes, I am, of course, talking about @Blackvegetable  , the grandmaster of quoting without comprehension.
 In his honor, I am issuing a simple challenge that he will, without question, refuse to accept.Below is my full statement on job creation:

 Now, here’s the challenge for Veghead

1. Debunk it in your own words. No copy-pasting, no link dumps. Just an actual, reasoned response.
2. No cherry-picking. Address the entire statement, not just one sentence out of context.
3. No insults as a replacement for an argument. If “so stupid” is your best response, you’ve already lost.
4. Explain why my analysis is wrong. If net job numbers are an accurate reflection of job creation, prove it. If AI job growth doesn't overshadow manufacturing losses, explain why.

This should be easy if my statement is as wrong as he claims. So, what will it be? Will the Copy-Paste King finally step up and offer an actual argument, or will he do what we all expect—dodge, cherry-pick, and post another quote with an insult?We all know the answer, but hey, let’s give him a chance to prove us wrong.

Elon will give you 8 billion dollars if you can find his penis and take the chainsaw back from the Cabinet.

Or Maybe he said million?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQBPgJQhQHc

JohnnyYou » 07 Mar 2025, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2025, 1:58 pm

Elon will give you 8 billion dollars if you can find his penis and take the chainsaw back from the Cabinet.

Or Maybe he said million?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQBPgJQhQHc

His penis isn't worth that. 

Vegas » 07 Mar 2025, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2025, 1:51 pm

Where is my evidence? Welcher. 

 A challenge for BV. @Cannonpointer  though we both know he will not accept, but just in case the planets happen to be aligned to induce an anomaly, would you mind modding?
The stakes.
If I lose, then I am permanently banned. If he loses then he is banned for a month. 

What a deal!
Ladies and gentlemen, longtime forum warriors, and admirers of Olympic-level debate dodging,

We are gathered here today to honor a true forum legend. A man who has spent years perfecting the fine art of copy-pasting, cherry-picking, dodging direct challenges, and calling people stupid as his only counterargument. Yes, I am, of course, talking about @Blackvegetable  , the grandmaster of quoting without comprehension.
 In his honor, I am issuing a simple challenge that he will, without question, refuse to accept.Below is my full statement on job creation:

 Now, here’s the challenge for Veghead

1. Debunk it in your own words. No copy-pasting, no link dumps. Just an actual, reasoned response.
2. No cherry-picking. Address the entire statement, not just one sentence out of context.
3. No insults as a replacement for an argument. If “so stupid” is your best response, you’ve already lost.
4. Explain why my analysis is wrong. If net job numbers are an accurate reflection of job creation, prove it. If AI job growth doesn't overshadow manufacturing losses, explain why.

This should be easy if my statement is as wrong as he claims. So, what will it be? Will the Copy-Paste King finally step up and offer an actual argument, or will he do what we all expect—dodge, cherry-pick, and post another quote with an insult?We all know the answer, but hey, let’s give him a chance to prove us wrong.

For starters

Cannon cannot judge given that he doesn't understand "survivorship bias" any better than you do.

@LowIQTrash  does, and because he doesn't have Syphilis he will judge.

Then I will address the lies in your "challenge".



 

Blackvegetable » 07 Mar 2025, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2025, 2:00 pm

For starters

Cannon cannot judge given that he doesn't understand "survivorship bias" any better than you do.

@LowIQTrash  does, and because he doesn't have Syphilis he will judge.

Then I will address the lies in your "challenge".

I need proof that he understands survivrship bias first. You obviously don't. So if you taught him, then I know he doesn't understand. 

 

Vegas » 07 Mar 2025, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2025, 2:03 pm

I need proof that he understands survivrship bias first. You obviously don't. So if you taught him, then I know he doesn't understand.

CP'sbattereduvula has proved that you have no idea....

@Cannonpointer  has Syphilis. 
 

Cedar » 07 Mar 2025, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2025, 10:27 am

I know a midget when I see one.

     
Bing Videos
 
 

Blackvegetable » 07 Mar 2025, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2025, 2:00 pm

For starters

Cannon cannot judge given that he doesn't understand "survivorship bias" any better than you do.

@LowIQTrash  does, and because he doesn't have Syphilis he will judge.

Then I will address the lies in your "challenge".

@LowIQTrash
If I decide to let you judge and you agree, there are a few things you need to understand about Veghead. He is a grandmaster of dishonest debate tactics—moving goalposts, strawmanning, cherry-picking, and posting irrelevant nonsense while pretending he won. That’s why I usually choose Cannon, since he already knows Veghead’s style of deception.However, if you can see through his usual nonsense and call it out for what it is, then welcome aboard.
 

Blackvegetable » 07 Mar 2025, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2025, 2:07 pm

CP'sbattereduvula has proved that you have no idea....

@Cannonpointer  has Syphilis.

Dude, how do you not know that the same joke told 100 times is never funny? Seriously. It was funny the first time. That's it. 

Your limited vocabulary is so becoming of you. 

Vegas » 07 Mar 2025, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2025, 2:10 pm

@LowIQTrash
If I decide to let you judge and you agree, there are a few things you need to understand about Veghead. He is a grandmaster of dishonest debate tactics—moving goalposts, strawmanning, cherry-picking, and posting irrelevant nonsense while pretending he won. That’s why I usually choose Cannon, since he already knows Veghead’s style of deception.However, if you can see through his usual nonsense and call it out for what it is, then welcome aboard.

I'll demonstrate your dishonesty when lowiq agrees.

Vegas » 07 Mar 2025, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2025, 2:11 pm

Dude, how do you not know that the same joke told 100 times is never funny? Seriously. It was funny the first time. That's it. 

Your limited vocabulary is so becoming of you.

It's his defining feature.