Liberal Forum

Vegas » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

No, you have a rule about that. You rarely, if ever, have any intelligent comments about your own OPs.  You demand everyone else to so you don't have to. 

Hence, no thoughts, etc...copy/paste. 

But I digress, let's talk about your most recent embarrassing gaffe.     Mr. Biden's net jobs.

Make your point clear so I may proceed to skin you...

*Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Nope.  I saw the speech. I have read left wing sources.  Now post what time The Five airs on the east coast.  When you answer that you then may ask a question.

Now keep living in denial, Coward.

Exactly..

The Five has convinced you that all that happened last week was Grifty's theater.

It wasn't. 
 

*Huey » Today, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:17 am

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Such a bitter loser.  Not very bright as well.

Let me tell you about his most recent episode of intellectual fail. Just when I thought he couldn't get any dumber, he found a way to lower that bar once more. 

He didn't read an example I gave him about Biden's numbers on jobs. You know how he is. He either strikes through or he only reads 4 words. After 'not reading' my example, he turned around gave me his "so goddamn stupid' comment and posted the formula for net jobs. One problem. He was actually agreeing with me. That was my point. Biden skewed the numbers so that when they used that formula, it gave incorrect results. Since he didn't bother reading my example, he ended up proving what I claimed.           


@Blackvegetable  aka 'same-eyes' it's time for you to off yourself. You have dug yourself into deep. 

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

All you know about this week is what The Five told you.

Who watches The Five?? You?

If you didn't hear, your gals over at The View are ALL running SKEERED since ABC/Disney has them on the crosshairs for TERMINATION!!

When all you do is SPEW **** AND HATE, America tunes you out. Which is a PRO TIP you probably should pay attention to but won't since IDIOTS LIKE YOU are just WAY TO **** STUPID to pay attention and read the room.

Have you heard the latest PREDICTIONS on how many seats Dhims are going to LOSE IN THE MIDTERMS??

Well, with NO MONEY from ActBlue's money laundering scheme coming in, NO MONEY TO LAUNDER since Trump has CUT THE **** OUT OF THE FUNDING, and likely CRIMINAL CHARGES coming soon for a BUNCH of LOSER ASSHOLES involved, I would say YOUR SIDE is in some mighty DEEP ****, don't you agree??

LOSERS!!

Run.

Nod.

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Make your point clear so I may proceed to skin you...

Your OP, your job 'same-eyes.'

Oh that's rights, you don't have any thoughts of your own on your own **** OP. 

 

Vegas » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

Let me tell you about his most recent episode of intellectual fail. Just when I thought he couldn't get any dumber, he found a way to lower that bar once more. 

He didn't read an example I gave him about Biden's numbers on jobs. You know how he is. He either strikes through or he only reads 4 words. After 'not reading' my example, he turned around gave me his "so goddamn stupid' comment and posted the formula for net jobs. One problem. He was actually agreeing with me. That was my point. Biden skewed the numbers so that when they used that formula, it gave incorrect results. Since he didn't bother reading my example, he ended up proving what I claimed.           

@Blackvegetable  aka 'same-eyes' it's time for you to off yourself. You have dug yourself into deep.

That was my point. Biden skewed the numbers so that when they used that formula, it gave incorrect results

So **** g'ddammned stupid 

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

So **** g'ddammned stupid

       That's what happens when you only use the data that 'survives'. Hence, survivorship bias. 

So **** g'ddammned stupid

Vegas » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

       That's what happens when you only use the data that 'survives'. Hence, survivorship bias. 

So **** g'ddammned stupid

So **** g'ddammned stupid.


 

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

So **** g'ddammned stupid.

So **** g'ddammned stupid

Vegas » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

       That's what happens when you only use the data that 'survives'. Hence, survivorship bias. 

So **** g'ddammned stupid

Describe this "data"

Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

Exactly..

The Five has convinced you that all that happened last week was Grifty's theater.

It wasn't.

Nah.  There is a reason The Five is not listed as one of my primary sources.  After you post what time The Five airs on the east coast I will be than happy to once again tell you why.

or you can keep entertaining with the lie in your post I a, currently replying to.

Vegas » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

Let me tell you about his most recent episode of intellectual fail. Just when I thought he couldn't get any dumber, he found a way to lower that bar once more. 

He didn't read an example I gave him about Biden's numbers on jobs. You know how he is. He either strikes through or he only reads 4 words. After 'not reading' my example, he turned around gave me his "so goddamn stupid' comment and posted the formula for net jobs. One problem. He was actually agreeing with me. That was my point. Biden skewed the numbers so that when they used that formula, it gave incorrect results. Since he didn't bother reading my example, he ended up proving what I claimed.           

@Blackvegetable  aka 'same-eyes' it's time for you to off yourself. You have dug yourself into deep.

He is a lonely guy who lives alone and has nothing better to do than lie on line to start ****.  He was bullied thru his life and tries to be a man here online.
 

*Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

He is a lonely guy who lives alone and has nothing better to do than lie on line to start ****.  He was bullied thru his life and tries to be a man here online.

Sounds like a confession, Sheilagh 

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Sounds like a confession, Sheilagh

Sounds like you living in your artificially overpriced duplex.

*Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Nah.  There is a reason The Five is not listed as one of my primary sources.  After you post what time The Five airs on the east coast I will be than happy to once again tell you why.

or you can keep entertaining with the lie in your post I a, currently replying to.

 

Nah. There is a reason The Five is not listed as one of my primary sources

True.....it is because you have no integrity and are ashamed.

I will be than happy to once again tell you why.

:rofl:  

But wait..

or you can keep entertaining with the lie in your post I a, currently replying to.

**** unreal.

*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Sounds like you living in your artificially overpriced duplex.

And some serious Issue...

Vegas » 26 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

26 minutes ago

Your OP, your job 'same-eyes.'

Oh that's rights, you don't have any thoughts of your own on your own **** OP.

That ******* statement is all yours..

Now run from it.




Good coward.
 

Blackvegetable » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

16 minutes ago

*Huey » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

25 minutes ago

Nah.  There is a reason The Five is not listed as one of my primary sources.  After you post what time The Five airs on the east coast I will be than happy to once again tell you why.

or you can keep entertaining with the lie in your post I a, currently replying to.

Nah. There is a reason The Five is not listed as one of my primary sources

True.....it is because you have no integrity and are ashamed.

I will be than happy to once again tell you why.

 

But wait..

or you can keep entertaining with the lie in your post I a, currently replying to.

**** unreal.

 

True.....it is because you have no integrity and are ashamed.

False.  This is about PRIMARY SOURCES.  You are lying again.  Since you are a coward and refuse to answer when the five airs (pussies act like that) I will curb stomp you now.  It comes on 5 PM EST meaning by that time I already know the knows from the sources listed when I answered you a long time ago.

I am not ashamed.  I listed my primary sources.  You have NO integrity.  Never have.

You are very entertaining and a puppet.  For years all I have had to do is post and you will come nipping at my heels like a Chihuahua

Blackvegetable » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

*Huey » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

Sounds like you living in your artificially overpriced duplex.

And some serious Issue...

 

Have no issues.  If you moved that cheap *** duplex down here it would be around 300,000.  Housing prices are inflated in your area due to zoning laws and lack of new builds.  Move my house up there and guess what?  It would be worth a hullava lot more than what yours is.


 

ROG62 » Today, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:54 am

what does one have to do with the other, brown, much less with the thread title?

so **** g'ddammned stupid
so **** g'ddammned stupid
so **** g'ddammned stupid
so **** g'ddammned stupid
so **** g'ddammned stupid

Maybe Laura will have K$sh Patel Reading hour for White Kids at the Kennedy Center?
 

*Huey » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

False.  This is about PRIMARY SOURCES.  You are lying again.  Since you are a coward and refuse to answer when the five airs (pussies act like that) I will curb stomp you now.  It comes on 5 PM EST meaning by that time I already know the knows from the sources listed when I answered you a long time ago.

I am not ashamed.  I listed my primary sources.  You have NO integrity.  Never have.

You are very entertaining and a puppet.  For years all I have had to do is post and you will come nipping at my heels like a Chihuahua

Have no issues.  If you moved that cheap *** duplex down here it would be around 300,000.  Housing prices are inflated in your area due to zoning laws and lack of new builds.  Move my house up there and guess what?  It would be worth a hullava lot more than what yours is.

Planning and Zoning?   I  think China owns it here.  Young people will soon never own a car or a home.  Some rich phook will.   

For all teacher was, he nailed that horse on folks not wanting low rent in their backyard.