Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 10 Mar 2025, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 10:15 am

 

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 10 Mar 2025, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 10:16 am

Prove that you answered it the first time. 

"Not a penny." That is an example of a lie. 

So **** repetitive. Redundant people are stupid as hell.

Blackvegetable » 10 Mar 2025, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 10:18 am

Not my job.

Lie.
.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 10 Mar 2025, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 8:32 am

https://www.wired.com/story/doge-softwa ... al-budget/

The extent of DOGE’s software purge is difficult to quantify. In searching for the word “license” across the descriptions of 13,800 federal contracts in the government’s central tracking database that have been updated to reflect terminations since Trump’s inauguration, WIRED found that roughly 60 of the canceled agreements appear to be explicitly for software. A couple of those cancellations—data visualization tool Tableau and Microsoft’s LinkedIn Recruiter—generated savings of about $4 million, according to DOGE’s official Wall of Receipts, a “transparent account” of findings and actions. The website has contained some errors, according to several media reports, and WIRED found earlier this week that Tableau and LinkedIn savings were listed as $0.

 WinZip standard licenses run about $35 annually per user, though large organizations are offered "special pricing," according to the product's official website. Lezius, the spokesperson for WinZip developer Alludo, declined to address whether the company has heard from DOGE representatives, but she says the company is “always happy to work with DOGE, GSA, and any customer” to meet their needs. And, she adds, WinZip, is “a trusted and highly affordable way for agencies to adhere to data security requirements 

Soooo.....that's 4 million divided by 150 million tax payers...

Let's ask Jesse Watters...

Vegas » 10 Mar 2025, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 10:21 am

Your claim, your job. 

No lie. You said it, I proved you wrong. Coward.

LowIQTrash » 10 Mar 2025, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 10:21 am

Doesn’t Watters have a PhD in Mathematics from MIT with summa cum laude honors?

What a prodigy…

LowIQTrash » 10 Mar 2025, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 10:21 am

Doesn’t Watters have a PhD in Mathematics from MIT with summa cum laude honors?

What a prodigy…

Blackvegetable » 10 Mar 2025, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 10:22 am

Prove it.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 10 Mar 2025, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 10:30 am

Prove what? I am not going to go dig up that conversation. Your **** memory is not my problem.

. Your OP/Claim, your job

Blackvegetable » 10 Mar 2025, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 10:33 am

Are these your words?

1. Your OP/Claim, your job.
2. I will not entertain your stalking
3. If I am a moron, then you lost 7 times to one, so what does that make you?
4. Hides.
5. Prove you answered it the first time..."not a penny" LIE LIE LIE!
6. **** your questions/demands , or 3k greenies.
7. Biden's survivorship bias skewed the "net" result. 
8. Level 0
9. Still no thoughts

There are more, but this will do for now.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 10 Mar 2025, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 10:36 am

Yes. And? 1

Hides.

Blackvegetable » 10 Mar 2025, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 10:46 am

And this?

1. Your OP/Claim, your job.
2. I will not entertain your stalking
3. If I am a moron, then you lost 7 times to one, so what does that make you?
4. Hides.
5. Prove you answered it the first time..."not a penny" LIE LIE LIE!
6. **** your questions/demands , or 3k greenies.
7. Biden's survivorship bias skewed the "net" result. 
8. Level 0
9. Still no thoughts
10. Video

There are more, but this will do for now.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 10 Mar 2025, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 10:46 am

 4. You hide incessantly. What's the problem?

Blackvegetable » 10 Mar 2025, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 12:03 pm

You're saying that these rules of yours don't apply to you.
Is that correct?

1. Your OP/Claim, your job.
2. I will not entertain your stalking
3. If I am a moron, then you lost 7 times to one, so what does that make you?
4. Hides.
5. Prove you answered it the first time..."not a penny" LIE LIE LIE!
6. **** your questions/demands , or 3k greenies.
7. Biden's survivorship bias skewed the "net" result. 
8. Level 0
9. Still no thoughts
10. Video

There are more, but this will do for now.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 10 Mar 2025, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 12:06 pm

Sigggghhhhhh....no *******. This again. God man. It was your claim, so.....1 & 10

How many **** times.

Blackvegetable » 10 Mar 2025, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 12:21 pm

Is that 

Yes, they don't 

or

No, they do

?

sfg'ds.

1. Your OP/Claim, your job.
2. I will not entertain your stalking
3. If I am a moron, then you lost 7 times to one, so what does that make you?
4. Hides.
5. Prove you answered it the first time..."not a penny" LIE LIE LIE!
6. **** your questions/demands , or 3k greenies.
7. Biden's survivorship bias skewed the "net" result. 
8. Level 0
9. Still no thoughts
10. Video
11. Hides behind copy/pasted ****. Still no intelligent thoughts.

There are more, but this will do for now.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 10 Mar 2025, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 12:23 pm

I literally said the rules apply to me.. Wow you are one stupid mother ****. 

1 & 10 How many **** times.

Blackvegetable » 10 Mar 2025, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 12:25 pm

But you don't post proof of your claims and you hide, incessantly.


 

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 10 Mar 2025, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 12:26 pm

Prove it.