He hides behind that age old tactic incessantly. He has used that one since the day he hopped on here in 2017.ROG62 » 13 Mar 2025, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑ but, but, if you were 'smart enough' (understand hoodspeak) , you'd of understood him...
well, he be a genius in his own mind...Vegas » 13 Mar 2025, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑ He hides behind that age old tactic incessantly. He has used that one since the day he hopped on here in 2017.
It's old and tiresome.
Maybe if you spent less time tantrumstalking and more time.....uhhhhh...I dunno....reading, then perhaps you wouldn't be such a moronVegas » 13 Mar 2025, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑ It clearly can mean anything. How the hell would anyone know about what trump said? You are so god damn **** stupid.
Die.
You keep running from questions today.Blackvegetable » 13 Mar 2025, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Maybe if you spent less time tantrumstalking and more time.....uhhhhh...I dunno....reading, then perhaps you wouldn't be such a moron
You haven't told me what's in it for me...
Thata boy keep proving my point that you cant answer the questions asked of you TODAY.
Reading brainless sources like CNN/Bloomberg, you mean?Blackvegetable » 13 Mar 2025, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Maybe if you spent less time tantrumstalking and more time.....uhhhhh...I dunno....reading, then perhaps you wouldn't be such a moron
Blackvegetable » 13 Mar 2025, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/13/us/p ... laims.html
DOGE Makes Its Latest Errors Harder to Find
Elon Musk’s group obscured the details of some new claims on its website, despite promises of transparency. But The Times was still able to detect another batch of mistakes.
Mr. Musk’s group posted a new set of claims to its website on March 2, saying it had saved taxpayers $10 billion by terminating 3,489 federal grants.
Previously when it posted new claims, DOGE, Mr. Musk’s government-restructuring effort, had included identifying details about the cuts it took credit for. That allowed the public to fact-check its work by comparing its figures with federal spending databases and talking to the groups whose funding had been cut.
This time, it did not include those details. A White House official said that was done for security purposes.
The result was that the group’s new claims appeared impossible to check. The New York Times, at first, found a way around the group’s obfuscation. That is because Mr. Musk’s group had briefly embedded the federal identification numbers of these grants in the publicly available source code. The Times used those numbers to match DOGE’s claims with reality, and to discover that they contained the same kind of errors that it had made in the past. Mr. Musk’s group later removed those identifiers from the code, and posted more batches of claims that could not be verified at all.
I guess that's one solution to the error problem...
Had we not been so fussy about testing for COVID far fewer Americans would have come down with COVID.
You NEVER do.FJB » 13 Mar 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Thata boy keep proving my point that you cant answer the questions asked of you TODAY.
Prove I didn't.Vegas » 13 Mar 2025, 3:53 pm » wrote: ↑ As always, Veghead accuses others of not answering questions while he refuses to answer any himself..the first time.
1. prove you answered your pic the first time.
predictable pos. The rules don't apply to narcissists.
Kind words...Mrkelly » 13 Mar 2025, 4:25 pm » wrote: ↑I love the way you run these **** all around the board
We don’t agree on everything
but I have mad props for your abilities
brown's like the redheaded stepchild we never had...Mrkelly » 13 Mar 2025, 4:25 pm » wrote: ↑I love the way you run these **** all around the board
We don’t agree on everything
but I have mad props for your abilities
I just squrted coffee outta my nose reading that
@ROG62 is inclined to run up on you with a golf tee clenched twixt his buttocks...TwoIfByTea » 13 Mar 2025, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑ I just squrted coffee outta my nose reading that
Hilarious
Can you provide some concrete examples of the murder with which Bammy got away?DeezerShoove » 13 Mar 2025, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Compared to "The Most Transparent Administration in History", they're doing just fine.
I don't recall the **** NYT having any problems with Bammy's promise...