Liberal Forum

Mrkelly » 11 Oct 2025, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Oct 2025, 1:22 pm

  Suckers

https://youtu.be/uHCMaTyQCGE?si=2NsjyoHNGg8dWQLr

Clickbait framing: The all-caps “TROOPS TO GAZA” screams sensationalism. It implies direct military deployment into one of the most volatile zones on Earth — something that would trigger global headlines, not just YouTube thumbnails.

Guest credibility: Ian Carroll isn’t a widely recognized geopolitical analyst. If he’s offering insider takes, they need receipts — not just vibes and conviction.

Lack of sourcing: No official Pentagon statements, no press briefings, no corroboration from mainstream outlets. If this were real, CNN, BBC, and Al Jazeera would be frothing.

Legal implausibility: Deploying U.S. troops into Gaza would violate multiple international norms unless coordinated with Israel, Egypt, or the Palestinian Authority. No such coordination is cited.

Political suicide: Even Trump’s most hawkish advisors would balk at boots-on-the-ground in Gaza. It’s a PR and strategic nightmare.

Narrative inflation: The video likely conflates troop movements in the region (e.g., naval repositioning, embassy protection) with direct combat deployment — a classic bait-and-switch tactic.

Production quality: If the video’s visuals are just talking heads over stock footage, it’s not journalism — it’s podcast cosplay.

Comment section: Probably a mix of “this is fake,” “wake up sheeple,” and “Trump 2024” echo chambers. Perfect for meme mining but not for credible analysis.

You believe all the **** you watch and read. I am way smarter than you are kelly. That's your first mistake.
 
 

MR-7 » 11 Oct 2025, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Oct 2025, 1:30 pm

You believe all the **** you watch and read. I am way smarter than you are kelly. That's your first mistake.

https://i.postimg.cc/gjKg7YXf/giggle-fat-baby.gif 

 
 

Roshambo » 11 Oct 2025, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Oct 2025, 1:33 pm

https://i.postimg.cc/gjKg7YXf/giggle-fat-baby.gif

What's going on Roshambo?
 

MR-7 » 11 Oct 2025, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Oct 2025, 1:34 pm

What's going on Roshambo?

 

MR-7 » 10 Oct 2025, 5:25 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Oct 2025, 5:25 pm

Roshambo, who is currently on your ignore list, made this post.

https://i.postimg.cc/43tbMJj8/black-lau ... ughter.gif

This NB is going to jail soon

https://i.postimg.cc/nz3kK3y8/laugh-out-loud-laugh.gif
 

MR-7 » 11 Oct 2025, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Oct 2025, 1:30 pm

Clickbait framing: The all-caps “TROOPS TO GAZA” screams sensationalism. It implies direct military deployment into one of the most volatile zones on Earth — something that would trigger global headlines, not just YouTube thumbnails.

Guest credibility: Ian Carroll isn’t a widely recognized geopolitical analyst. If he’s offering insider takes, they need receipts — not just vibes and conviction.

Lack of sourcing: No official Pentagon statements, no press briefings, no corroboration from mainstream outlets. If this were real, CNN, BBC, and Al Jazeera would be frothing.

Legal implausibility: Deploying U.S. troops into Gaza would violate multiple international norms unless coordinated with Israel, Egypt, or the Palestinian Authority. No such coordination is cited.

Political suicide: Even Trump’s most hawkish advisors would balk at boots-on-the-ground in Gaza. It’s a PR and strategic nightmare.

Narrative inflation: The video likely conflates troop movements in the region (e.g., naval repositioning, embassy protection) with direct combat deployment — a classic bait-and-switch tactic.

Production quality: If the video’s visuals are just talking heads over stock footage, it’s not journalism — it’s podcast cosplay.

Comment section: Probably a mix of “this is fake,” “wake up sheeple,” and “Trump 2024” echo chambers. Perfect for meme mining but not for credible analysis.

You believe all the **** you watch and read. I am way smarter than you are kelly. That's your first mistake.

“Trump Sends U.S. TROOPS To Gaza Conflict!”
Reality: No official confirmation. No Pentagon statement. No mainstream coverage.
Verdict: Clickbait alert.
 

MR-7 » 11 Oct 2025, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Oct 2025, 1:30 pm

Clickbait framing: The all-caps “TROOPS TO GAZA” screams sensationalism. It implies direct military deployment into one of the most volatile zones on Earth — something that would trigger global headlines, not just YouTube thumbnails.

Guest credibility: Ian Carroll isn’t a widely recognized geopolitical analyst. If he’s offering insider takes, they need receipts — not just vibes and conviction.

Lack of sourcing: No official Pentagon statements, no press briefings, no corroboration from mainstream outlets. If this were real, CNN, BBC, and Al Jazeera would be frothing.

Legal implausibility: Deploying U.S. troops into Gaza would violate multiple international norms unless coordinated with Israel, Egypt, or the Palestinian Authority. No such coordination is cited.

Political suicide: Even Trump’s most hawkish advisors would balk at boots-on-the-ground in Gaza. It’s a PR and strategic nightmare.

Narrative inflation: The video likely conflates troop movements in the region (e.g., naval repositioning, embassy protection) with direct combat deployment — a classic bait-and-switch tactic.

Production quality: If the video’s visuals are just talking heads over stock footage, it’s not journalism — it’s podcast cosplay.

Comment section: Probably a mix of “this is fake,” “wake up sheeple,” and “Trump 2024” echo chambers. Perfect for meme mining but not for credible analysis.

You believe all the **** you watch and read. I am way smarter than you are kelly. That's your first mistake.

US sending about 200 troops to Israel to monitor Gaza ceasefire deal

 The United States is sending about 200 troops to Israel to help support and monitor the ceasefire deal in Gaza as part of a team that includes partner nations, nongovernmental organizations and private sector players, U.S. officials said Thursday.The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss details not authorized for release, said U.S. Central Command is going to establish a “civil-military coordination center” in Israel that will help facilitate the flow of humanitarian aid as well as logistical and security assistance into the territory wracked by two years of war.

https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your ... fire-deal/

 “just gonna monitor”

”and security assistance into the territory”



Vietnam anyone? 

 
 

Mrkelly » 11 Oct 2025, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Oct 2025, 1:42 pm

US sending about 200 troops to Israel to monitor Gaza ceasefire deal

 The United States is sending about 200 troops to Israel to help support and monitor the ceasefire deal in Gaza as part of a team that includes partner nations, nongovernmental organizations and private sector players, U.S. officials said Thursday.The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss details not authorized for release, said U.S. Central Command is going to establish a “civil-military coordination center” in Israel that will help facilitate the flow of humanitarian aid as well as logistical and security assistance into the territory wracked by two years of war.

https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your ... fire-deal/

 “just gonna monitor”

”and security assistance into the territory”

Vietnam anyone?

We have been in Israel many times and will continue to do so. The Issue I was pointing out is all the spin and lies making it sound like we were going into GAZA. 
 

MR-7 » 11 Oct 2025, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Oct 2025, 1:55 pm

We have been in Israel many times and will continue to do so. The Issue I was pointing out is all the spin and lies making it sound like we were going into GAZA.

what you think “security assistance” will lead to? 

answer?

the new 9/11 moment “they” are looking for to get Americans to “consent” to war 

 

Mrkelly » 11 Oct 2025, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Oct 2025, 2:01 pm

what you think “security assistance” will lead to? 

answer?

the new 9/11 moment “they” are looking for to get Americans to “consent” to war

I have no idea what this will lead to, and neither do you. What I do know is that no matter what, you are so ate up with TRUMP, that if this ceasefire works, you will never give TRUMP the credit for it. Why can't you be a REAL MAN and give credit to someone when it is deserved? I still give Biden credit to this day, cause I'm a REAL MAN.
 

MR-7 » 11 Oct 2025, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Oct 2025, 2:13 pm

I have no idea what this will lead to, and neither do you. What I do know is that no matter what, you are so ate up with TRUMP, that if this ceasefire works, you will never give TRUMP the credit for it. Why can't you be a REAL MAN and give credit to someone when it is deserved? I still give Biden credit to this day, cause I'm a REAL MAN.

I have given tRump kudos when he does something good

This will not be one of those times 
 

Mrkelly » 11 Oct 2025, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Oct 2025, 2:20 pm

I have given tRump kudos when he does something good

This will not be one of those times

You SUCKED BIDEN'S COCK more times than anyone can count.

Tell us how you loved it.

Your "predictions" are like your ASSHOLE- FULL OF ****!!

Mrkelly » 11 Oct 2025, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Oct 2025, 2:20 pm

I have given tRump kudos when he does something good

This will not be one of those times

Ok...fair enough. And I was wrong. I now remember you giving kudos. So, let's get to the point. Why will this be one of those times?
 

MR-7 » 11 Oct 2025, 3:07 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Oct 2025, 3:07 pm

Ok...fair enough. And I was wrong. I now remember you giving kudos. So, let's get to the point. Why will this be one of those times?

I wasn't sure if it was fog out here in Maryland this week or smoke from the fires in War Torn Portland.
 
It could have been Snoop Dog and ET out back doing bong hits..

JohnnyYou » 11 Oct 2025, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Oct 2025, 3:13 pm

I wasn't sure if it was fog out here in Maryland this week or smoke from the fires in War Torn Portland.
 
It could have been Snoop Dog and ET out back doing bong hits..

What's the flavor?
 

MR-7 » 11 Oct 2025, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Oct 2025, 3:15 pm

What's the flavor?

I got some Silver Cloudz from Grow West.  100$ 14 grams.  I don't like it.  But at the moment it is hitting me ok.

JohnnyYou » 11 Oct 2025, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Oct 2025, 3:16 pm

I got some Silver Cloudz from Grow West.  100$ 14 grams.  I don't like it.  But at the moment it is hitting me ok.

That's a Heavy-hitting indica
 

MR-7 » 11 Oct 2025, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Oct 2025, 3:20 pm

That's a Heavy-hitting indica

I thought it was Sativa. I try to stay there.

Strain Names are shyt. They are like jobs reports from the Trump admin. They mean nothing.
 

JohnnyYou » 11 Oct 2025, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Oct 2025, 3:25 pm

I thought it was Sativa. I try to stay there.

Strain Names are shyt. They are like jobs reports from the Trump admin. They mean nothing.

Silver Cloudz is an indica-dominant hybrid cannabis strain bred by Grow West Cannabis Company, and it’s got some serious floaty vibes. Here's the full breakdown:

Genetics

• Lineage: Cross between White Runtz and Fuel Gelato
• Profile: Heavy-hitting indica with a terpene-rich punch

Aroma & Flavor

• Creamy cheese
• Sour citrus
• Spicy, earthy undertones

It’s got that funky-gas-meets-dessert vibe — think metallic pillows dipped in lemon funk.

Effects

• Deeply relaxing, euphoric, and sedative
• Ideal for evening use or winding down
• Users report a floating sensation — hence the name “Silver Cloudz”
  
  You will never be smarter than me. You are smoking the wrong stuff. It's all about the terpenes.

 

*Beekeeper » 11 Oct 2025, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Oct 2025, 2:55 pm

You SUCKED BIDEN'S COCK more times than anyone can count.

Tell us how you loved it.

Your "predictions" are like your ASSHOLE- FULL OF ****!!

  Show me one time praising biden Cletus 
 

*Beekeeper » 11 Oct 2025, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Oct 2025, 2:55 pm

You SUCKED BIDEN'S COCK more times than anyone can count.

 

@Mrkelly  Can't wait to see you try and deny this.