Thousands, actually. I'll name a few for you:Blackvegetable » 18 Mar 2025, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models
Now tell me
the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design
How many families?
How many designs?
Try again, **** idiot.Skans » 18 Mar 2025, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑ Thousands, actually. I'll name a few for you:I'm bored. That's enough - - and this is just from memory.
- A1 and variants
- A2 and variants
- M4 and variants
- Slab-Side A1 and variants
- M4 sub-guns - at least 50 of these
- Pistol variants of all of the above
- Sporter Carbine
- HBAR configuration (with/without bayo lug)
- SBR variants of all of the above
- Nearly every common caliber, including 12-gauge and 50 BMG in various AR-variants
- Tri-burst variants
- DIAS configured variants
- Billet Receiver variants with commercial tubes
- Billet Receiver variants with Milspec tubes
- Folding stock variants
- Gas Piston variants
- Russian ADAR
- Dawoo AR-100
You are really showcasing your gun-stupidity today. There are thousands of AR variants. I listed a few of the more common/interesting ones that I could actually remember without cut and pasting from some internet website.Blackvegetable » 18 Mar 2025, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑ Try again, **** idiot.
You ammosexuals don't even understand the language of your fetish.
They're called "variants"
As I suggested, you may debate the choice of collective noun with the author.Skans » 18 Mar 2025, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑ You are really showcasing your gun-stupidity today. There are thousands of AR variants. I listed a few of the more common/interesting ones that I could actually remember without cut and pasting from some internet website.
The AR is a platform, not a family. I'm not going to list out for you the thousands of variations of AR's ever manufactured. I covered about 80% with my list. If that is not good enough for you, then know what you are talking about and be specific in what you are asking.
You are like trying to communicate with a 2-year old.
I directly and succinctly answered your dumb question. I am willing to let others be the judge of whether I answered it or not. Now, if you think my answer was "wrong", then it is on you to explain. So far you have not refuted, rebutted or countered my answer to your question. Therefore, I WIN again.Blackvegetable » 18 Mar 2025, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑ As I suggested, you may debate the choice of collective noun with the author.
Now please answer the question - after which we can move on to the consequences of you not reading the citation you demanded.
is brown claiming they're one in the same? Interchangeable? I see it as a camel straights vs candy cigarettes with a red tip...*Huey » 17 Mar 2025, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑ Colt saying it was redesigned is not an interpretation.
The BATF saying the weapon was changed in basic design is not a re interpretation.
The military saying it is not an assault rifle/weapon is not a re interpretation.
Your source listing what was changed in the lower is not a re interpretation.
I have posted the changes today as well as multiple times in the past.
IT was designed for the civilian population and was never labeled a military weapon
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom I'm satisfied that you can't distinguish "variant" from "design"...Skans » 18 Mar 2025, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑ I directly and succinctly answered your dumb question. I am willing to let others be the judge of whether I answered it or not. Now, if you think my answer was "wrong", then it is on you to explain. So far you have not refuted, rebutted or countered my answer to your question. Therefore, I WIN again.
DeezerShoove » 17 Mar 2025, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑ Dearest twat,
I merely reply to you 99.9% of the time. You implied I basically can't exist without you.
This is obviously a lie. You need to bolster your self-perceived important. I don't.
I personally think you are a waste of bandwidth and you apparently have no life.
You call yourself "jacked", are an Oedipus baby, have no discernible personality...
IOW a creepy little ****. I don't like you.
Most sincerely,
Dr Shoove

JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom You are a true idiot. Here's why:Blackvegetable » 18 Mar 2025, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑ I'm satisfied that you can't distinguish "variant" from "design"...
Now, looking at the following excerpt, to how many "families" and "designs" does it make reference?
the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design
Skans » 17 Mar 2025, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑ "family of weapons"??? Dude, who says that? It's not like a FAL and an AR get together and make babies. I think the word you are reaching for is PLATFORM.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom ya know, brown? you really are a stupid ****...just sayin'...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom learn to **** talk then...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom A simple question with a 3 letter answer.Skans » 18 Mar 2025, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑ You are a true idiot. Here's why:
- You are using Wikipedia articles to support your nonsense. This proves you have no clue what you are talking about.
- Wikipedia authors don't use the common nomenclature "platform", which is a tip-off that these are poorly written articles by people who either cut and pasted the information from elsewhere or simply don't understand what they are writing about.
- I have explained this to you, yet you continue to point me to 4 stupid, unrelated Wikipedia articles
- The problems with the Wikipedia articles you link to are
- One article is specifically about the Colt AR-15
- Another article is about generic M16 rifles
- The third article is unrelated nonsense about Colt's Manufacturing
- The fourth article specifically talks about an original ArmaLite design.
- You fail to state how any of these 4 Wikipedia articles are relevant.
- You further demonstrate that you have no real understanding of modern AR-pattern rifles, sub-guns and pistols.
There has been a huge shift by civilians and world military organizations to the AR-Pattern rifles. Because of this, there are more variants than anyone can count. Every "design" your dopey articles mention are "variants" of the AR-Pattern rifles.
Oh, and for your information, "Colt" doesn't really exist anymore. It was Purchased by Česká zbrojovka Group SE.
Blackvegetable » 18 Mar 2025, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑ I'm satisfied that you can't distinguish "variant" from "design"...
Now, looking at the following excerpt, to how many "families" and "designs" does it make reference?
the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design
You continue to refuse to answer the question....
That's lie.
You're STILL not answering.*Huey » 18 Mar 2025, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑ That's lie.
I have answered those questions REPEATEDLY. I refuse to answer them for the umpteenth time.