Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 18 Mar 2025, 4:32 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Mar 2025, 4:32 pm

Tiny,

What year was that definition crafted?

*Beekeeper » 18 Mar 2025, 4:46 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Mar 2025, 4:46 pm

Who **** CARES, asskiss?? Because, UNLESS you can find something that has CHANGED THAT IS DIFFERENT that happened in the last 10 or so years, it's STILL THE SAME TODAY!!

AND THAT IS ON YOU TO FIND TO "refute" THE CLAIM!!

Your VAPID ATTEMPTS to deflect are NOT GOING TO PLAY HERE, DIKSUKM!!

*Huey » 18 Mar 2025, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Mar 2025, 3:28 pm

You should just stop.  This embarrassing for you:

FEDERAL DEFINITION OF A MACHINE GUN

For purposes of federal law, a “machinegun” is defined as:“[A]ny weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot, without manually reloading, by a single function of the trigger. The term shall also include the frame or receiver of any such weapon, any part designed and intended solely and exclusively, or combination of parts designed and intended, for use in converting a weapon into a machinegun, and any combination of parts from which a machinegun can be assembled if such parts are in the possession or under the control of a person.”12

https://giffords.org/lawcenter/gun-laws/policy-areas/hardware-ammunition/machine-guns-50-caliber/#:~:text=For%20purposes%20of%20federal%20law,single%20function%20of%20the%20trigger.

And for head shot, so to speak:
Colt M16, Model 614, 5.56mm Machine Gun

Classification

Machinegun

https://www.atf.gov/firearms/firearms-g ... 3#colt-m16

No where in that description (ATF web page) is the word automatic used.

This is like shootin' fish in a barrel with Sporter.  Too Easy!

You should just stop.  This embarrassing for you:

No where in that description (ATF web page) is the word automatic used.

This is like shootin' fish in a barrel with Sporter.  Too Easy!
 

Blackvegetable » 18 Mar 2025, 5:28 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Mar 2025, 5:28 pm

is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically

Tiny,

I'm beginning to suffer qualms about beating you with your own words.

It's too easy.

Blackvegetable » 18 Mar 2025, 5:14 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Mar 2025, 5:14 pm

The idiot breaking out in caps; apparently.

Why don't we wait to see if @*HooooeyVagina answers?

Blackvegetable » 18 Mar 2025, 4:32 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Mar 2025, 4:32 pm

Tiny,

What year was that definition crafted?

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."

ROG62 » 19 Mar 2025, 5:32 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 5:32 am

brown, go play in the street where it's obvious you belong...

Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 5:40 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 5:40 am

@Vegas

*Beekeeper » 19 Mar 2025, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 6:47 am

Sad. BV is just too **** STUPID for words.

And you CLAIM you went to Brown?? What did you do there besides CLEAN THE URINALS??

Because you sure as hell didn't get any "education" of any kind.

Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 7:00 am

*Beekeeper » 19 Mar 2025, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 7:24 am

NO JURY believed her, DIKSUKM!!

Testimony vs. VERDICT.  Verdict wins EVERY. Damn. Time.

Still the MOST STUPID PIECE OF BROWN **** ALIVE!!


 

Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 7:33 am

Read it, you **** idiot

*Beekeeper » 19 Mar 2025, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 8:03 am

Why?? The JURY heard it and what did THEY find? And that JURY is making YOU LOOK LIKE THEIR BITCHBOY IDIOT!!

https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png

!!

NEVER anything worth reading. Evah!!

Blackvegetable » 18 Mar 2025, 4:32 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Mar 2025, 4:32 pm

Tiny,

What year was that definition crafted?

Blackvegetable » 18 Mar 2025, 5:28 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Mar 2025, 5:28 pm

is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically

Tiny,

I'm beginning to suffer qualms about beating you with your own words.

It's too easy.

Blackvegetable » 18 Mar 2025, 5:14 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Mar 2025, 5:14 pm

The idiot breaking out in caps; apparently.

Why don't we wait to see if @*HooooeyVagina answers?

*Huey » 19 Mar 2025, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 9:09 am

Idiot, it is still the classification.  You were **** wrong.  Admit it.  You don’t know **** and it about this.

Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 9:35 am

Focus on answering the question, Quimmie...

*Huey » 19 Mar 2025, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 9:38 am

I did in another post.  You'll see it.

But, regarded,, you were to call **** that the BATF classifies the M16, or any automatic weapon, a machine-gun.  Wrong.  Wrong. Wrong.

Make your case.  No more questions, Loser.

Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 9:45 am

You know the case is made when you decline to stipulate to facts.