Do you understand what a Syllogism is?Vegas » 43 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Copy/pastes and hides twice.![]()
![]()
![]()
And so it begins. Veghead is scrambling to save himself...somehow.. Questions/demands/copy-paste is his usual MO to hide, so it makes sense.
Vegas » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Idiot. Always hiding. Always.
So now we're playing the 'look, I know a big word' game? Cute. Yes, I understand what a syllogism is. The real question is: do you understand how to use one correctly, or are you just hoping the word itself will make you sound smart?
You do have a habit of misusing big words.
1. And **** your upcoming hiding. I am still waiting for your intelligent history that you claimed to have without a copy/paste.
DeezerShoove » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Funny. I have told him before about him using "big" words almost right.
A person honestly trying can **** up here and there. NP.
But a person attempting to show off or be condescending? A complete asshole.
There is a difference.
Vegas » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ He doesn't know how to use them appropriately. He hides behind them hoping that he he comes across smarter than everyone else. The guy is a ****.
DeezerShoove » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I honestly don't know why you guys reply back and forth.
He **** up EVERY thread he posts in... tiresome, vacuous posts.
btw
Anyone who has to tell people he's "jacked" is a ****.
I've never known one that proved otherwise.
You have no **** idea.Vegas » Yesterday, 7:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Idiot. Always hiding. Always.
So now we're playing the 'look, I know a big word' game? Cute. Yes, I understand what a syllogism is. The real question is: do you understand how to use one correctly, or are you just hoping the word itself will make you sound smart?
You do have a habit of misusing big words.
1. And **** your upcoming hiding. I am still waiting for your intelligent history that you claimed to have without a copy/paste.
Coozie,DeezerShoove » Yesterday, 7:36 pm » wrote: ↑ I honestly don't know why you guys reply back and forth.
He **** up EVERY thread he posts in... tiresome, vacuous posts.
btw
Anyone who has to tell people he's "jacked" is a ****.
I've never known one that proved otherwise.
So someone invented 70 socks for the sole purpose of yelling at the news?Vegas » Yesterday, 7:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Idiot. Always hiding. Always.
So now we're playing the 'look, I know a big word' game? Cute. Yes, I understand what a syllogism is. The real question is: do you understand how to use one correctly, or are you just hoping the word itself will make you sound smart?
You do have a habit of misusing big words.
1. And **** your upcoming hiding. I am still waiting for your intelligent history that you claimed to have without a copy/paste.
no, you are running from questions would prove that for you. You got your assed kicked BIGLY and as dear old dad knew you are not man enough to accept it.Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 6:43 pm » wrote: ↑ I have to prove my assertion that the Semi-automatic Colt AR-15 is the same design as the M16..
I have done so.
This debate is over.
The facts, as detailed in the citation, prove it for me.*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ no, you are running from questions would prove that for you. You got your assed kicked BIGLY and as dear old dad knew you are not man enough to accept it.
you don’t know **** about this. Tell us When the last time was you shot the two different weapons and then answer the questions. If not, take your L and admit I am the better man
Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The facts, as detailed in the citation, prove it for me.
Your case suffers from a complete absence of evidence.
That makes you The Loser.....again.
Yes, the citation.*Huey » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ No, the citation. Keep running from questions, daddy’s lil ******.
My case is based on facts and experience. Yours case is based on the fact you are not man enough to admit you are wrong.
Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 5:09 pm » wrote: ↑ the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design
how many families?
How many designs?
Stop.*Beekeeper » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Based ON, but not identical in a TON of ways, DIKSUKM!!
Something you would have NO KNOWLEDGE OF since you aren't SMART enough to research the differences. Never were, never will be.
And the M-16 underwent MANY design changes over the years from non-chrome plated chambers to changes in auto fire mechanisms. Something the AR-15 differs in greatly. Including the various configuration for ammo that the M16 never had happen. They were ALWAYS chambered for the 5.56 NATO round whereas the AR-15 has had many variations of cartridges.
Must be the load Dad deposited in your Mom....that would account for your mental disabilities.