Liberal Forum

I've been around more shooters than I could possibly count in nearly 2 decades, both professionally and as a hobbyist. That being said, I've never seen a liberal/leftist who could handle or knew a damn thing about guns. Stick to the liberal hobbies BV. Slide another dildo into your *** you **** ***.

Vegas » 43 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

43 minutes ago

Copy/pastes and hides twice.       

And so it begins. Veghead is scrambling to save himself...somehow.. Questions/demands/copy-paste is his usual MO to hide, so it makes sense.

Do you understand what a Syllogism is?

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Do you understand what a Syllogism is?

Idiot. Always hiding. Always. 

So now we're playing the 'look, I know a big word' game? Cute. Yes, I understand what a syllogism is. The real question is: do you understand how to use one correctly, or are you just hoping the word itself will make you sound smart? 

You do have a habit of misusing big words. 



1. And **** your upcoming hiding. I am still waiting for your intelligent history that you claimed to have without a copy/paste. 

Vegas » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Idiot. Always hiding. Always. 

So now we're playing the 'look, I know a big word' game? Cute. Yes, I understand what a syllogism is. The real question is: do you understand how to use one correctly, or are you just hoping the word itself will make you sound smart? 

You do have a habit of misusing big words. 

1. And **** your upcoming hiding. I am still waiting for your intelligent history that you claimed to have without a copy/paste.

Funny. I have told him before about him using "big" words almost right.

A person honestly trying can **** up here and there. NP.
But a person attempting to show off or be condescending? A complete asshole.

There is a difference.

DeezerShoove » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Funny. I have told him before about him using "big" words almost right.

A person honestly trying can **** up here and there. NP.
But a person attempting to show off or be condescending? A complete asshole.

There is a difference.

He doesn't know how to use them appropriately. He hides behind them hoping that he he comes across smarter than everyone else. The guy is a ****.

Vegas » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

He doesn't know how to use them appropriately. He hides behind them hoping that he he comes across smarter than everyone else. The guy is a ****.

I honestly don't know why you guys reply back and forth.
He **** up EVERY thread he posts in... tiresome, vacuous posts.

btw
Anyone who has to tell people he's "jacked" is a ****.
I've never known one that proved otherwise.  

DeezerShoove » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

I honestly don't know why you guys reply back and forth.
He **** up EVERY thread he posts in... tiresome, vacuous posts.

btw
Anyone who has to tell people he's "jacked" is a ****.
I've never known one that proved otherwise.

I reply because I have a civic duty to dehumanize narcissists wherever they may roam. 

He has claimed so many **** things about himself since 2017. It's just what narcissists do. They can't help it.

Damn.

TARD POST 101.

yikes

Vegas » Yesterday, 7:24 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 7:24 pm

Idiot. Always hiding. Always. 

So now we're playing the 'look, I know a big word' game? Cute. Yes, I understand what a syllogism is. The real question is: do you understand how to use one correctly, or are you just hoping the word itself will make you sound smart? 

You do have a habit of misusing big words. 

1. And **** your upcoming hiding. I am still waiting for your intelligent history that you claimed to have without a copy/paste.

You have no **** idea.

Because you are a moron 

DeezerShoove » Yesterday, 7:36 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 7:36 pm

I honestly don't know why you guys reply back and forth.
He **** up EVERY thread he posts in... tiresome, vacuous posts.

btw
Anyone who has to tell people he's "jacked" is a ****.
I've never known one that proved otherwise.

Coozie,

Show me a post that you believe best tepresents your professed ideals.

You may choose from your archive or Vegas'...

There must be a plethora.


 

Vegas » Yesterday, 7:24 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 7:24 pm

Idiot. Always hiding. Always. 

So now we're playing the 'look, I know a big word' game? Cute. Yes, I understand what a syllogism is. The real question is: do you understand how to use one correctly, or are you just hoping the word itself will make you sound smart? 

You do have a habit of misusing big words. 

1. And **** your upcoming hiding. I am still waiting for your intelligent history that you claimed to have without a copy/paste.

So someone invented 70 socks for the sole purpose of yelling at the news?

 im2-510 minutes agosquatchman.-510 minutes agorippy 38-510 minutes ago

 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 6:43 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 6:43 pm

I have to prove my assertion that the Semi-automatic Colt AR-15 is the same design as the M16..

I have done so.

This debate is over.

no, you are running from questions would prove that for you.  You got your assed kicked BIGLY and as dear old dad knew you are not man enough to accept it.

you don’t know **** about this.  Tell us When the last time was you shot the two different weapons and then answer the questions.  If not, take your L and admit I am the better man
 

*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

no, you are running from questions would prove that for you.  You got your assed kicked BIGLY and as dear old dad knew you are not man enough to accept it.

you don’t know **** about this.  Tell us When the last time was you shot the two different weapons and then answer the questions.  If not, take your L and admit I am the better man

The facts, as detailed in the citation, prove it for me.

Your case suffers from a complete absence of evidence.

That makes you The Loser.....again.


 

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

The facts, as detailed in the citation, prove it for me.

Your case suffers from a complete absence of evidence.

That makes you The Loser.....again.

No, the citation.  Keep running from questions, daddy’s lil ******.

My case is based on facts and experience.  Yours case is based on the fact you are not man enough to admit you are wrong.

*Huey » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

18 minutes ago

No, the citation.  Keep running from questions, daddy’s lil ******.

My case is based on facts and experience.  Yours case is based on the fact you are not man enough to admit you are wrong.

Yes, the citation.

As follows

the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

Note that "family" and "design" are in the singular. This proves my case and makes you The Loser.

Nod.
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 5:09 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 5:09 pm

the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

how many families?

How many designs?

Based ON, but not identical in a TON of ways, DIKSUKM!!

Something you would have NO KNOWLEDGE OF since you aren't SMART enough to research the differences. Never were, never will be.

And the M-16 underwent MANY design changes over the years from non-chrome plated chambers to changes in auto fire mechanisms. Something the AR-15 differs in greatly. Including the various configuration for ammo that the M16 never had happen. They were ALWAYS chambered for the 5.56 NATO round whereas the AR-15 has had many variations of cartridges.
 

*Beekeeper » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

20 minutes ago

Based ON, but not identical in a TON of ways, DIKSUKM!!

Something you would have NO KNOWLEDGE OF since you aren't SMART enough to research the differences. Never were, never will be.

And the M-16 underwent MANY design changes over the years from non-chrome plated chambers to changes in auto fire mechanisms. Something the AR-15 differs in greatly. Including the various configuration for ammo that the M16 never had happen. They were ALWAYS chambered for the 5.56 NATO round whereas the AR-15 has had many variations of cartridges.

Stop.

How many designs?


 

Bzv is a liar

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 7:19 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 7:19 pm

Do you understand what a Syllogism is?

Must be the load Dad deposited in your Mom....that would account for your mental disabilities. 
 

Blackvegetable » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

Stop.

How many designs?

WHO CARES besides YOU?? MANY as in modifications to automatic to semi automatic switching, chambers being chrome plated, to stock and sighting changes.

EACH of the M16 changes vs the AR15 changes makes it enough of a difference, that one can ONLY SAY that the original 1950's Armalite design vs the end product of the M16 are NOTHING identical to the same end result AR-15 being produced today!! Because they might APPEAR to look similar, doesn't mean they are identical in any manner. Parts are NOT interchangeable from one design to the other.

Now, suck it up, cupcake!! You have ZERO firearm knowledge OTHER than some **** your handlers have blown up your ***!!