Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 7:19 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 7:19 pm

Do you understand what a Syllogism is?

Do you understand you're a goddamned filthy piece of *** ****?

*Beekeeper » 45 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

45 minutes ago

WHO CARES besides YOU?? MANY as in modifications to automatic to semi automatic switching, chambers being chrome plated, to stock and sighting changes.

EACH of the M16 changes vs the AR15 changes makes it enough of a difference, that one can ONLY SAY that the original 1950's Armalite design vs the end product of the M16 are NOTHING identical to the same end result AR-15 being produced today!! Because they might APPEAR to look similar, doesn't mean they are identical in any manner. Parts are NOT fully interchangeable from one design to the other.

Now, suck it up, cupcake!! You have ZERO firearm knowledge OTHER than some **** your handlers have blown up your ***!!

Shhhhhhh...
 

RebelGator » 50 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

50 minutes ago

Must be the load Dad deposited in your Mom....that would account for your mental disabilities.

That you and your mother share a father would account for yours.

Blackvegetable » Today, 5:34 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:34 am

Yes, the citation.

As follows

the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

Note that "family" and "design" are in the singular. This proves my case and makes you The Loser.

Nod.
 


 

BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828

Keep running!


 
 

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Shhhhhhh...

https://i.postimg.cc/D0Cr7yPS/Baby-Whining.jpg

As she ALWAYS does!! ESPECIALLY after the MASSIVE CURB STOMPINGS administered on an HOURLY basis!!

NOTHING worth reading.

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

That you and your mother share a father would account for yours.

You can run a DNA test along with a CODIS search and I bet you can find out which CONVICT was your sperm donor!!

I'll bet he was in on DRUG CHARGES TOO!! Because NO DECENT MAN would have a MENTALLY ILL, DRUG ADDLED PIECE OF **** "son" like you unless he was one.

*Beekeeper » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

You can run a DNA test along with a CODIS search and I bet you can find out which CONVICT was your sperm donor!!

I'll bet he was in on DRUG CHARGES TOO!! Because NO DECENT MAN would have a MENTALLY ILL, DRUG ADDLED PIECE OF **** "son" like you unless he was one.

@RebelGator  

*Huey » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828

Keep running!

List your citations.

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

List your citations.

Keep runnng!

*Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Keep runnng!

You have none.

You lose. 
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 5:09 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 5:09 pm

the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

how many families?

How many designs?

If you google enough snippets and you ask enough rhetorical questions, we'll start believing your a gun smith and a trail boss, fruitcake.       

MR-7 » Yesterday, 5:30 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 5:30 pm

OK...what do you squat these days, 150?

If that boy squats, it's to pee.
 

Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

You have none.

You lose.

I have the one you keep posting.  

Did you lose the link?

Blackvegetable » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

21 minutes ago

@RebelGator

He's not going to bail you out either, DIKSUKM!!

Run along now....

https://i.gifer.com/4DZz.gif
 

MR-7 » Yesterday, 5:48 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 5:48 pm

But, but, but....i thought you dems said AR meant assault rifle. Which one is it?

That was low hanging fruit for the gun grabbers

Because they were marketed as “assault rifles”

Cannonpointer » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

18 minutes ago

If that boy squats, it's to pee.

          thanks for the morning laugh
 

Mrkelly » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

That was low hanging fruit for the gun grabbers

Because they were marketed as “assault rifles”



 

No, it was marketed as a Semi Automatic rifle:



@Blackvegetable  

Note the sentence that starts "Painstaking engineering redesign......"

Here's your "L".
 

*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

No, it was marketed as a Semi Automatic rifle:



@Blackvegetable  

Note the sentence that starts "Painstaking engineering redesign......"

Here's your "L".

Tell me that you're **** joking...it's advertising copy.

Moron.

*Huey » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

No, it was marketed as a Semi Automatic rifle:



@Blackvegetable  

Note the sentence that starts "Painstaking engineering redesign......"

Here's your "L".

  Funny looking “L” 

[img]blob:ba6f03c8-0474-483c-8e8d-551f61162210[/img]
https://smokinggun.org/wp-content/uploa ... ag1985.jpg

[img]blob:c22b7c66-9216-40de-ae47-41bb0eb92637[/img]
https://smokinggun.org/wp-content/uploa ... ag1983.jpg

[img]blob:a99fc019-51b0-43d1-bd30-8de36684b314[/img]
https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/91b ... _QL80_.jpg


Want more ?
 

Blackvegetable » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

Tell me that you're **** joking...it's advertising copy.

Moron.

 

I know.  THe manufacture told you it was redesigned.  The NATF told you it was changed in basic design.  Wiki listed the redesign in of the internal workings of the lower.

Yet, you seem to think you, a guy who has NO experience with either weapon, knows more about it than they do.

Keep running.  

BV's Sporter Loss https: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828