*Huey » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Colt saying it was redesigned is not an interpretation.
The BATF saying the weapon was changed in basic design is not a re interpretation.
The military saying it is not an assault rifle/weapon is not a re interpretation.
Your source listing what was changed in the lower is not a re interpretation.
I have posted the changes today as well as multiple times in the past.
IT was designed for the civilian population and was never labeled a military weapon
Not according to Colt.IT was designed for the civilian population
Colt saying it was redesigned...
What weapon needed to be so changed?The BATF saying the weapon was changed in basic design
It is unambiguous evidence that something once DESIGNED was MODIFIED.Your source listing what was changed in the lower is not a re interpretation.
Blackvegetable » Today, 8:19 am » wrote: ↑ Coozie,
Please.
Without me, you and @*VegasVagina are nothing.
Let's sort this out here and now.
Show me something choice..
Yawn…Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Not according to Colt.
What weapon needed to be so changed?
It is unambiguous evidence that something once DESIGNED was MODIFIED.
Unless you are venting in my absence, of course.DeezerShoove » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Hey needy ****,
Regarding our "relationship", I rarely do anything but reply to you.
If you weren't such a **** attention whore liar, you couldn't post this nonsense.
But since you are, you do...![]()
![]()
![]()
Whatta ****.
Good morning Huey.*Huey » Yesterday, 5:54 pm » wrote: ↑ I got a M&P compact 45 but I also have a Ruger ECS9s that is a sweet little pocket pistol. I also have a M&P Shield 9 plus. Another sub compact that is a 13 + 1
@Blackvegetable google all that.
*GHETTOBLASTER » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Good morning Huey.
Have you anything bad to say about the M&P 9mm...?
My local range says that their loaner gave them a lot of trouble.
Blackvegetable » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Unless you are venting in my absence, of course.
We're not making any progress here, Coozie....it isn't 'cause you were bluffin', or nuffin', right?
I think everyone feels your rage, Coozie...DeezerShoove » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Dearest twat,
I merely reply to you 99.9% of the time. You implied I basically can't exist without you.
This is obviously a lie. You need to bolster your self-perceived important. I don't.
I personally think you are a waste of bandwidth and you apparently have no life.
You call yourself "jacked", are an Oedipus baby, have no discernible personality...
IOW a creepy little ****. I don't like you.
Most sincerely,
Dr Shoove
Think you might retake the Master Bedroom with it ?
My misguided troll is back.
Is this your post, @*HooooeyVagina?
I got a M&P compact 45 but I also have a Ruger ECS9s that is a sweet little pocket pistol. I also have a M&P Shield 9 plus. Another sub compact that is a 13 + 1
@Blackvegetable google all that
Why you wear the "*"...
And every time we discuss this you promptly forget why I ask.*Huey » Today, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑ You have been posting here for going on 8 years and you still can't who made a post. That's pretty sad.
Blackvegetable » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ And every time we discuss this you promptly forget why I ask.
But you insist I must remember everything you are too ashamed to repeat.
*Huey » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Ok, let's see what you got. Yes, those are my words.
What is your point?
Blackvegetable » Today, 5:05 am » wrote: ↑ So someone invented 70 socks for the sole purpose of yelling at the news?