Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
The Great Debate Challenge – Will Veghead Finally Defend His Own Words?
The Great Debate Challenge – Will Veghead Finally Defend His Own Words?
By Vegas
Yesterday 2:19 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
Why will he be off this forum?
BV won't accept.Vegas » Today, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Veghead is eager to attack my thread, yet somehow his own threads are off-limits. He demands the chance to tear apart my arguments but refuses to let his own face the same scrutiny. It's almost like he knows they can't survive without his usual copy-pasting, dodging, and endless question spam. So let’s see if he’s willing to play fair, or if he’ll just keep running in circles.
So, here is a deal for @Blackvegetable
A fair duel. You pick any one of your threads, but this time, you have to actually defend it with your own intelligent thoughts. No copy-pasting, no dodging, no turning it around on me with endless questions and demands. Just straight answers to my questions about your own argument—you know, like an actual debate instead of your usual game of “let me ask a hundred questions so I never have to answer one.”In return, I’ll do the same. I’ll post one of my threads, and you’ll get to question me under the same rules. No distractions, no evasions—just a fair debate where both sides actually stand by what they say. If I do, but you don't after you agreeing, then that is a forfeit on your part. Thus, I win.
The stakes? Whoever defends their thread the best wins. Loser takes a month-long ban from the forum. If you’re as confident as you pretend to be, this should be an easy win for you. Or will you find a way to dodge this too? I mean, let’s be honest, watching you run from accountability is like watching a squirrel on meth —frantic, desperate, and hilarious.
So what’s it gonna be, Professor Ctrl+C? Are you finally going to defend something for once, or are you just going to keep throwing out questions like a malfunctioning Magic 8-Ball?
@Cannonpointer it's unlikely he will agree, but if he does, can you mod. And yes, Veghead, we know. You think he has syphilis. Redundant pos.
If BV did accept, he'd lose.
If BV lost, he'd go back on his bet.
BV is not an honorable person.
because he is a asshole
Well, all the assholes here, of which their are quite a few, say i'm an asshole too, but I'm not, I just despise leftist pieces of ****.
Prove they are tantrums. It looks like a simple challenge to me.
Project much?
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 6:42 pm
Mrkelly » Today, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑ This made me think of you and Huey
and a few more
damn dude
[img]blob:e49596d9-5869-402e-b8c1-e1a6d69593fc[/img]
https://rall.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/3-14-25.jpg
That doesn't make a lot of sense. But hey, you do you.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 6:44 pm
Yep. This is why I do this. He starts a one-sided challenge with me. I accept by making it a fair two-sided one. Thus, he caves.
Every. Single. Time. It's fun to publicly demoralize a narcissist.
@Blackvegetable
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
murdock » Today, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Your mother and the Shetland pony that butt **** her to give you life, jigaboo.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 7:23 pm
And that ain't good.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Yesterday 7:35 pm
hint
you are the guy in green
Who is online
In total there are 3104 users online :: 2 registered, 14 bots, and 3088 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, LowIQTrash
Bots: app.hypefactors.com, YandexBot, LCC, Mediapartners-Google, proximic, DuckDuckBot, MicroMessenger, semantic-visions.com, ADmantX, Googlebot, linkfluence.com, oBot, curl/7, bingbot