Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 14 Oct 2014 5:30 pm » wrote:
Thanks.

Actually, my nickname for it is "Religion," not "Deflection."

But, yeah - I dick-slapped ya, and ya got a thrill.

I notice that every time I dick slap you, you feel compelled to compliment me.

No, there was no slappin' coming from you.

But hey, I am glad you think so highly of yourself.

Brattle Street » 14 Oct 2014 12:48 pm » wrote:
sure. no one sees that for the weak cowardly troll crap that it is. this guy is just too damned deceptive for me to pick up on.

Uh oh. You called him out - that's a deflection.

His first "nice deflection" on me was criticizing me for calling him on his false conservatism. "Nice deflection," he stammers, his cheeks flush with blood and his midgethood turgid with humiliation. I look at this mook and say, DEFLECTION, you *** wipe?? That's my **** THESIS, you CLOWN!"

Nice deflection = BWAHAHAHAHA!!!

Huey » 14 Oct 2014 5:34 pm » wrote:
No, there was no slappin' coming from you.

But hey, I am glad you think so highly of yourself.

Whatever you say, kid. You're already on record referring to an argument for my thesis as a "deflection." So, whistle in the dark all you want, little progladyte.

Huey » 14 Oct 2014 10:59 am » wrote:
So just lett a superior force steamroll a country? Using you standard we should have stayed out of WW2 regardless of Japanese actions and allowed nazi Germany's to continue to roll.

A thesis which you attached to the above comment and question that you used to deflect from addressing.

That's your style. When asked tough questions you write some lengthy response, bloviating on everything but what you were asked.

I am used to it.

Huey » 14 Oct 2014 6:03 pm » wrote:
A thesis which you attached to the above comment and question that you used to deflect from addressing.

That's your style. When asked tough questions you write some lengthy response, bloviating on everything but what you were asked.

I am used to it.

Tough questions, child? You made a pretense at a reductio ad absurdem which was actually a falsehood, imputing motives and results not in evidence. You also buried a heap of premises in your "tough question," making it of very little more integrity than, "Have you stopped beating your wife, sir - and please, just yes or no?"

You'll know when you hit ME with a tough question, little mouse, because I'll congratulate you for it. Frankly, ever since you took the lowest of low roads TWICE on this board - torture, and C.U., - your game has been off. But that is to be expected, Selling out causes blocks. Gold don't come from tin, son.

jayjay » 13 Oct 2014 3:57 am » wrote:Good OP. However, another thing to consider:

Credible conservatism went out with the Nixon era--but I personally believe TV to be the biggest culprit, for reasons I think should be obvious.

I don't think it's coming back. Quite the contrary--in fact it's an increasing problem not only at the federal level but also in local elections (thanks for that, too, SCOTUS).

Have to agree with you on that.

When the **** did I become a weirdo? We've been pumping out volunteer projects to repair homes, cars, and stock the pantries of veterans in our community with the Legion for the past couple years, and the look on people's faces when I knock on their door and ask them for $5 to help keep their WWII veteran neighbor from being put in a nursing home by the State.

Granted I have found some very powerful allies, particularly in my corporate executive neighbor who has donated almost $5,000 to buy groceries for the old guys on my list, but the number of people who are actively looking to contribute to protecting their communities is pretty damn slim.

Cannonpointer » 14 Oct 2014 5:26 pm » wrote: I'm pretty sure it's the giggly queers who huzzah torture, and who cannot WAIT to gush the next meme some asswipe in a think tank invents, who have mis-defined conservatism, glory hole. It was not I who pretzeled himself to defend a police state which keeps 88% of its population in landless penury, troglodyte.

I can promise you this, you soulless twat: YOU - a boy **** meme spewer with an iq of 60 - are not going to be defining conservatism for anyone except your fellow craigers, you vagina.

Gosh, how much of this babbling is psychosis and how much outright lies?

Only his hairdresser knows for sure.

RichClem » 14 Oct 2014 10:10 pm » wrote: Gosh, how much of this babbling is psychosis and how much outright lies?

Only his hairdresser knows for sure.

more troll crap.
do you wonder why clemmy resorts to clear and obvious troll crap that not only contains NO content, there is the added feature of clemmy demonstrating his pitifully lame sense of humor. Clemmy lives in a world where he thinks that "hairdresser" reference makes him look witty. That alone should tell you all about the intellectual capacity going on in that brain of his.

JunkerGreen » 14 Oct 2014 8:36 pm » wrote:
Have to agree with you on that.

When the **** did I become a weirdo? We've been pumping out volunteer projects to repair homes, cars, and stock the pantries of veterans in our community with the Legion for the past couple years, and the look on people's faces when I knock on their door and ask them for $5 to help keep their WWII veteran neighbor from being put in a nursing home by the State.

Granted I have found some very powerful allies, particularly in my corporate executive neighbor who has donated almost $5,000 to buy groceries for the old guys on my list, but the number of people who are actively looking to contribute to protecting their communities is pretty damn slim.

It's fatigue. Every corner has a veteran drug user begging help in the name of patriotism. EVery grocery store parking lot has a mother with child, begging for food. Every median at every traffic signal has a can to help the firefighters save the children at Saint Jude's kitten rescue and soup kitchen,


As voluminous as the anti-soup line programs are, we're coming back to soup lines. People are give-out. And the **** drugs the bankers and CIA keep peddling to the underclass just add to the whole problem, making those who CAN help suspicious and edgy.

Brattle Street » 14 Oct 2014 11:12 pm » wrote:
more troll crap.
do you wonder why clemmy resorts to clear and obvious troll crap that not only contains NO content, there is the added feature of clemmy demonstrating his pitifully lame sense of humor. Clemmy lives in a world where he thinks that "hairdresser" reference makes him look witty. That alone should tell you all about the intellectual capacity going on in that brain of his.

Hey, don't even get him started on women drivers!

Now, take his mother in law - PLEASE!

Cannonpointer » 15 Oct 2014 1:45 am » wrote: Hey, don't even get him started on women drivers!

Now, take his mother in law - PLEASE!

Maybe there should be a part of the forum reserved for the mentally ill.

RichClem » 15 Oct 2014 9:38 am » wrote:
Maybe there should be a part of the forum reserved for the mentally ill.

We have a conservatives only section.

RichClem » 15 Oct 2014 9:38 am » wrote:
Maybe there should be a part of the forum reserved for the mentally ill.

There is. It's nose to butt with me - right where you always hang out. If I ever get colon cancer, you're gonna get nose cancer. It'll be reagan and poppi all over again,

And by nose cannon means dick...
I took deciphering cannons posts 101 in college..lofl

Cannonpointer » 15 Oct 2014 10:37 am » wrote: There is. It's nose to butt with me - right where you always hang out. If I ever get colon cancer, you're gonna get nose cancer. It'll be reagan and poppi all over again,

Hey, speaking of psychosis AND integrity, did you hear they actually found WMD's in Iraq?

I'm absolutely sure you'll correct your many, many claims to the contrary.

Many, many, many, many claims.

Here's the link. Don't get lost!

http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f ... were-wrong

RichClem » 15 Oct 2014 10:44 am » wrote:
Hey, speaking of psychosis AND integrity, did you hear they actually found WMD's in Iraq?

I'm absolutely sure you'll correct your many, many claims to the contrary.

Many, many, many, many claims.

Here's the link. Don't get lost!

http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f ... were-wrong

Oopsie - didn't click.

This is not an iraq thread, ***. You're gonna have to give me your evidence in another place. I have no doubt it will be the second lie I caught you in today.

What? ''

I can't jear you!

What?

Cannonpointer » 15 Oct 2014 11:35 am » wrote: Oopsie - didn't click.

This is not an iraq thread, ***. You're gonna have to give me your evidence in another place.

So how many post have you left in the various Iraq WMD threads?

A number less than one, perhaps?

I have no doubt it will be the second lie I caught you in today.

It's a "lie" to ask a question about Iraq WMD's in the wrong thread?

Clearly you're using the troll dictionary.

Brattle Street » 13 Oct 2014 6:32 pm » wrote: do you think it will last for ever and ever?

don't worry, god will save you

I think, therefore I am.

You don't. You parrot.

deezer shoove » 18 Oct 2014 10:54 am » wrote: I think, therefore I am.

You don't. You parrot.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

translation:
I got the **** kicked out of me again so i must say something that makes me look astute, like that i am a responsibility student of Descarte. Look at me…. i am all philosophical and stuff.

what a pitiful pseudo
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Brattle Street » 18 Oct 2014 12:00 pm » wrote: HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

translation:
I got the **** kicked out of me again so i must say something that makes me look astute, like that i am a responsibility student of Descarte. Look at me…. i am all philosophical and stuff.

what a pitiful pseudo
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

"I doubt, therefore, I think. I think, therefore, I am" (Descarte)

Being a doubter is a good thing...