Liberal Forum

RichClem » 13 Oct 2014 2:47 pm » wrote: Look, when liberals abide by their Big Government philosophy as they clearly have under Obama, spending goes up, restrained by Repubs, if they abide by their small government principles.

Only when Repubs go Beltway and violate their principles as they did under Bush does spending go up.

Spending goes up under all presidents. You are too stupid to see that you are being played.

bigsky » 13 Oct 2014 9:25 am » wrote:
That is because the opening poster is not very articulate, and usually makes posts with random punctuation and frequently misspelled words....making him unintelligible

" When it comes to unleashing military power...bush is the ****...the best bringer or war ever...Big Sky

Annoyed Liberall » 13 Oct 2014 2:52 pm » wrote: Spending goes up under all presidents. You are too stupid to see that you are being played.

What does the word "restrained" mean, moonbat?

Speaking of stupid.

RichClem » 13 Oct 2014 3:09 pm » wrote:
What does the word "restrained" mean, moonbat?

Speaking of stupid.

Did the republicans restrain Bush from doubling the debt, Corky?

Is America doomed?

deezer shoove » 13 Oct 2014 4:04 pm » wrote:Is America doomed?

Perhaps.....perhaps not.

Cedarswamp » 13 Oct 2014 4:01 pm » wrote: Did the republicans restrain Bush from doubling the debt, Corky?

Go read my pertinent point about philosophy, moonbat

jayjay » 13 Oct 2014 4:40 am » wrote:
Of course, we have not simply seen an unbroken, level descent of The Conservative in popular entertainment. Burns himself was replaced with a Bostonian named Winchester, who seemed to hearken from a past era. He was silly, of course, but he was presented with comparative sympathy.

Yes, but let is not forget that while the conservative got a bit of sun on Burns' departure, he also found himsellf deeper in shadow, in the charcter of Colonel Flag.

RichClem » 13 Oct 2014 2:09 pm » wrote:
Have you no idea the record of Communism?

How many American soldiers had to die before Vietnam decided communism was a bad idea? Seriously...

RichClem » 13 Oct 2014 2:47 pm » wrote:
Look, when liberals abide by their Big Government philosophy as they clearly have under Obama, spending goes up, restrained by Repubs, if they abide by their small government principles.

Only when Repubs go Beltway and violate their principles as they did under Bush does spending go up.

Look, when pitbulls abide by their bite people principles, biting goes up, restrained by poodles, if they abide by their "hey, don't bite that person" principles.

Only when poodles go Pitway, as they did under Grrrregory Van Bitethehand, does biting go up.

So, just to be clear in what you are communicating, dunce, that rape you creeps laid on America did not violate AMERICA - it violated your "principles."

RichClem » 13 Oct 2014 2:47 pm » wrote:
Look, when liberals abide by their Big Government philosophy as they clearly have under Obama, spending goes up, restrained by Repubs, if they abide by their small government principles.

Only when Repubs go Beltway and violate their principles as they did under Bush does spending go up.

So, in a very real way, YOU were the victims - not the folks you screwed over by lying about your "principles."

OOOPS! We violated our "principles!" But don't worry, Murka! We still have the SAME EXACT PRINCIPLES WE DID when we raped you! We're just NOT gonna violated 'em, ANYMORE. Nope - not gonna do it - wouldn't be prudent.

Not gone da.

Not ga da!

Nagada!

Cedarswamp » 13 Oct 2014 1:41 pm » wrote:
Did you kill liberalism too? How abount Kenny.......you bastard!

I had nothng to do with Kenny,.

I rubbed my penis on liberalism. If it died, it was a wilting rose and needed to go.

RichClem » 13 Oct 2014 8:57 am » wrote: Ignoring the fact that Nixon governed as a liberal, especially on economic policy.

Which is why he was a failure on domestic policy and why public sentiment allowed Dems to unethically drive him from office.

You're an idiot.

I no more "ignored" how Nixon governed than I "ignored" that Martha Stewart's Duck Confit recipe calls for salt. It was not germane, you retarded **** ape.

RichClem » 13 Oct 2014 8:57 am » wrote:Oh, he'll be back in November, trust me.

My God, you freak. I didn't mean it THAT way. I was using "daddy" as a METAPHOR, you moron - a metaphor for ACTUAL CONSERVATISM.

What ever underground homosexual content you read into that was coming from YOUR sick mind, you filthy animal. Keep that stuff in bathrooms where it ALSO doesn't belong, you **** wierdo!

Cannonpointer » 13 Oct 2014 5:30 pm » wrote: So, in a very real way, YOU were the victims - not the folks you screwed over by lying about your "principles."

OOOPS! We violated our "principles!" But don't worry, Murka! We still have the SAME EXACT PRINCIPLES WE DID when we raped you! We're just NOT gonna violated 'em, ANYMORE. Nope - not gonna do it - wouldn't be prudent.

Not gone da.

Not ga da!

Nagada!

Funny how conservatives forget about the part of Big government when it comes to issues like balancing the budget, NSA, Abortion rights, The Draft, Same Sex marriage, and military actions in foreign lands.

Cannonpointer » 13 Oct 2014 5:38 pm » wrote: You're an idiot.

I no more "ignored" how Nixon governed than I "ignored" that Martha Stewatrs Duck Confit recipe calls for salt. I was not germane, you retarded **** ape.

Which is it, schizo, not germane or did you ignore it?

In fact, you didn't write one single word in that post about it.

My God, you freak. I didn't mean it THAT way. I was using "daddy" as a METAPHOR, you moron - a metaphor for ACTUAL CONSERVATISM.

Well duuuuh.

And it will be back in a few weeks.

Did you make a prediction about the Senate?

What ever underground homosexual content you read into that was coming from YOUR sick mind, you filthy animal. Keep that stuff in bathrooms where it ALSO doesn't belong, you **** wierdo!

That's sane.

TotallyRad » 13 Oct 2014 5:40 pm » wrote: Funny how conservatives forget about the part of Big government when it comes to issues like balancing the budget, NSA, Abortion rights, The Draft, Same Sex marriage, and military actions in foreign lands.

If you took the time to read conservative publications, you'd see those issues discussed and debated.

Annoyed Liberall » 13 Oct 2014 9:03 am » wrote:Most people don't understand true conservatism and true liberalism. The terms have been bastardized by hate politics. A true liberal is also conservative.

Yes, and when true liberals disagree with the postion of conseratives, they try to sell them, rather than denouncing them. So the attacks on conservatism in the 70s were not inspired by liberals. They were inspired by Trotskyites.

And I blame Trotskyistes very specifically, because I think that most people - myself included - know very little about that term, so it's unlikely I'll be challenged. If I AM challenged, look for me to reframe and blame the Mensheviks (thereby inadvertantly giving glory hole clem an opening to accuse me of being a bolshevik, though he'll be too stupid to see it).

Huey » 13 Oct 2014 9:00 am » wrote:Someone needs to tell the 38-40% of Americans that indentify as conservatives (almost twice as much as liberal) that their ideology is dead.

Nothing to see here folks, just the old meme of repeating a lie until it becomes the truth,

We are all aware of yur existence, Pouty-Lips Hoodaman.

We are also aware of what you represent. Let me see if I can channel it - gonna borrow one of your snapbacks, kid:

Huey » 13 Oct 2014 9:00 am » wrote:C.U, granted a number of people who live in America - be they right handed or left, tall or short - the right to dream a dream, and act on that dream in a manner whoch lets them build something for themselves, coming together to form any sort of corporation, union, or association, regardless what color hair or eyes they have, or what their partucular politics are, whether I agree or disagree with their partucular ideas, and as the original coming together-ers of the corporation, union or association, exercise their rights within the framework of being the people for whom the court found..

If you can't undertsand that simple logic, then stop talking about Cittizens United - you're makig yourself look stupid,

AVAUNT!

We get it that you're here - and we get it that you represent 25% (not the ridiculous number you cited) of the population. We also get that you are not conservatives, and that you represent 75% of all the sucking off in toilets.

RichClem » 13 Oct 2014 5:45 pm » wrote: Which is it, schizo, not germane or did you ignore it?

In fact, you didn't write one single word in that post about it.

That pretty much answers your question, dimwit.

The post was not about it.

It was not germane, you **** spider monkey.

RichClem » 13 Oct 2014 5:45 pm » wrote: Retarded grinning ape ****, moron-speak, drool

Hey, you're entitled to your opinion. There's some jizm on your chin.

RichClem » 13 Oct 2014 8:57 am » wrote:Ignoring the fact that Nixon governed as a liberal, especially on economic policy.

You want daddy's attention on this statement, you little ****? Okay, let's do it, twat:

Nixon governed as a liberal, you say? Well, nancy panties, Internationalist reagan out-liberalled the **** out of nixon, you maroon. Internationalist REAGAN made the Department of Education a cabinet office. Internationalist REAGAN started the war on drugs, filling our prisons and driving drug use UP.. Internationalist REAGAN tripled the national debt in dollars - and any inflation in the mix was Internationalist REAGAN'S inflaton, so it's irrelevant to the fact that he tripled the national debt in dollars owed.

Internationalist REAGAN raised taxes on workers 7 out of 8 years while lowering them on folks whose income derives from capital investments in our economy or any other nation's economy - making him an INTERNATIONALIST. Internationalist REAGAN worked tirelessly to erase America's borders as regards trade. Internationalist REAGAN issued the first amnesty for undocumented workers. Internationalist REGAN cut and ran from Lebanon, and never met a tiny, unarmed democratic government that he didn't think the military might of America could overthrow.

Internationalist REAGAN governed as a liberal and spent as a drunken liberal. So WHO YOU GOT, SKIPPY? WHO IS YOUR STANDARD BEARER, SKIPPY? YOU WANNA SAY, "OOPSIE DOOPSIE, WE WENT BELTWAY - OUR BAD, WON'T HAPPEN AGAIN?" FINE. WE HEAR YOU. WE WANT TO TRUST YOU. WHO IS YOUR STANDARD BEARER - WHAT HAVE YOU DONE FOR MURKA SINCE NIXON, YOU LITTLE CHIMPANZEE?