Liberal Forum

RichClem » 13 Oct 2014 8:57 am » wrote:Ignoring the fact that Nixon governed as a liberal, especially on economic policy.

You want daddy's attention on this statement, you little ****? Okay, let's do it, twat:

Nixon governed as a liberal, you say? Well, nancy panties, Internationalist reagan out-liberalled the **** out of nixon, you maroon. Internationalist REAGAN made the Department of Education a cabinet office. Internationalist REAGAN started the war on drugs, filling our prisons and driving drug use UP.. Internationalist REAGAN tripled the national debt in dollars - and any inflation in the mix was Internationalist REAGAN'S inflaton, so it's irrelevant to the fact that he tripled the national debt in dollars owed.

Internationalist REAGAN raised taxes on workers 7 out of 8 years while lowering them on folks whose income derives from capital investments in our economy or any other nation's economy - making him an INTERNATIONALIST. Internationalist REAGAN worked tirelessly to erase America's borders as regards trade. Internationalist REAGAN issued the first amnesty for undocumented workers. Internationalist REGAN cut and ran from Lebanon, and never met a tiny, unarmed democratic government that he didn't think the military might of America could overthrow.



Internationalist REAGAN governed as a liberal and spent as a drunken liberal. So WHO YOU GOT, SKIPPY? WHO IS YOUR STANDARD BEARER, SKIPPY? YOU WANNA SAY, "OOPSIE DOOPSIE, WE WENT BELTWAY - OUR BAD, WON'T HAPPEN AGAIN?" FINE. WE HEAR YOU. WE WANT TO TRUST YOU. WHO IS YOUR STANDARD BEARER - WHAT HAVE YOU DONE FOR MURKA SINCE NIXON, YOU LITTLE CHIMPANZEE?

deezer shoove » 13 Oct 2014 4:04 pm » wrote:Is America doomed?

do you think it will last for ever and ever?

don't worry, god will save you

RichClem » 13 Oct 2014 5:46 pm » wrote:
If you took the time to read conservative publications, you'd see those issues discussed and debated.

OH! Our bad!

So we voted for less government every time we installed you people since 1980. And we GOT more government.

But in your PUBLICATIONS, you have terribly interesting self-serving circle jerks about what you're NOT delivering on - so it's A-O-****-KAY!

You're a spider monkey.

I'll tell you what, you little ape. I am going to introduce you to the man who controls your brain from the grave. Meet Leo Strauss, little monkey:

Having left Germany in the summer of 1932, Strauss was writing to Lowith from Paris. By May of 1933, Hitler had been in power in Germany for four months, and the Nazis were extending their control over the whole society. Strauss and Lowith had been students of Martin Heidegger, who had recently delivered his Rectoral Address at the University of Freiburg, in which he enjoined the students and faculty to exert "spiritual leadership" in the service of the new Nazi Germany. I was in Freiburg a few months ago, and some of the faculty at the University still talk about the troubling influence of Heidegger

Strauss began his letter by talking about the efforts he and Lowith were making to get grants from the Rockefeller Foundation. He then wrote (as translated by Altman):

Those days are gone CP,,,,,,,,,

You need only look at the "God Gap" for the last 2 decades.
http://www.christianpost.com/news/the-god-gap-80210/

The Godless progressives are infiltrating the Democrat party. These Progs seat themselves on the throne(in their pathetic minds) and become all knowing and all seeing (Rebel comes to mind), and want to control MORE of your daily activities. Obama's mission, fundamental change.

Trust No Man That Bows To No God,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Fuelman » 13 Oct 2014 7:05 pm » wrote:Those days are gone CP,,,,,,,,,

You need only look at the "God Gap" for the last 2 decades.
http://www.christianpost.com/news/the-god-gap-80210/

The Godless progressives are infiltrating the Democrat party. These Progs seat themselves on the throne(in their pathetic minds) and become all knowing and all seeing (Rebel comes to mind), and want to control MORE of your daily activities. Obama's mission, fundamental change.

Trust No Man That Bows To No God,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

The issue is not the democrats. The democrats can be the most wonderful folks ever - and it won't help America. No country can survive without a healthy conservative voice. We are in a downward spiral.

bigsky » 13 Oct 2014 9:25 am » wrote:
That is because the opening poster is not very articulate, and usually makes posts with random punctuation and frequently misspelled words....making him unintelligible

Ther fashinoly gose - thfgoomd, ****!!!!!

Fuelman » 13 Oct 2014 7:05 pm » wrote:Those days are gone CP,,,,,,,,,


Trust No Man That Bows To No God,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

that hardly skims the surface. the converse is equally ridiculous for helping make value distinctions in human beings.
i find it safer and more efficient to just assume that everyone is an asshole, until they give me reason to think otherwise.

Cannonpointer » 13 Oct 2014 6:00 pm » wrote:
We are all aware of yur existence, Pouty-Lips Hoodaman.

We are also aware of what you represent. Let me see if I can channel it - gonna borrow one of your snapbacks, kid:

We get it that you're here - and we get it that you represent 25% (not the ridiculous number you cited) of the population. We also get that you are not conservatives, and that you represent 75% of all the sucking off in toilets.

And the cannon diversion begins.

Huey » 13 Oct 2014 8:19 pm » wrote: And the cannon diversion begins.

How can calling you girls out on your false claims of conservatism be a "diversion," little mouse?

It's my THESIS, you **** ape!

Cannonpointer » 13 Oct 2014 6:26 pm » wrote: You want daddy's attention on this statement, you little ****? Okay, let's do it, twat:

I have a better idea.


Why don't you go **** yourself?

RichClem » 13 Oct 2014 9:47 pm » wrote:
I have a better idea.

Why don't you go **** yourself?

Uh oh. Someone poked the grumpy bear.

Cannonpointer » 13 Oct 2014 6:26 pm » wrote:Internationalist reagan out-liberalled the **** out of nixon, you maroon.

Wow, off the meds again, I see.

RichClem » 13 Oct 2014 10:02 pm » wrote:
Wow, off the meds again, I see.

Good refutation, proggie.

Cannonpointer » 13 Oct 2014 10:03 pm » wrote: Good refutation, proggie.

Why should I bother refuting psychotic bulls***?

RichClem » 13 Oct 2014 10:04 pm » wrote: Why should I bother refuting psychotic bulls***?

according to YOU, that is what you do here.. spending hours exactly doing that, as your behavior attests to.

now your tune is changed to "why should you" . which side of your mouth should we believe today?

you dopey little twit… do you really think we don't notice that your story changes with the required camouflage? you are that easy.
no wonder you are so afraid of me…. i see right through you little boy.

RichClem » 13 Oct 2014 5:46 pm » wrote: If you took the time to read conservative publications, you'd see those issues discussed and debated.

That's a pretty weak dismissal of those big government programs.

Fuelman » 13 Oct 2014 7:05 pm » wrote:Those days are gone CP,,,,,,,,,

You need only look at the "God Gap" for the last 2 decades.
http://www.christianpost.com/news/the-god-gap-80210/

The Godless progressives are infiltrating the Democrat party. These Progs seat themselves on the throne(in their pathetic minds) and become all knowing and all seeing (Rebel comes to mind), and want to control MORE of your daily activities. Obama's mission, fundamental change.

Trust No Man That Bows To No God,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

As an atheist, I could only wish it were true. But no, The Christians are the majority in both parties.

RichClem » 13 Oct 2014 2:09 pm » wrote: Of course we were trying to save South Vietnam, as well the rest of Asia and ultimately the West.

Have you no idea the record of Communism?

And the solution is killing Americans on foreign soil? Your solution has a record failing consistently.

Cannonpointer » 13 Oct 2014 4:37 pm » wrote:
Yes, but let is not forget that while the conservative got a bit of sun on Burns' departure, he also found himsellf deeper in shadow, in the charcter of Colonel Flag.

Still, it was a war satire, after all--you've got to have a little bit of slapstick, which isn't really out of keeping with reality. And Margaret Houlihan warmed up over time as well.

Cannonpointer » 13 Oct 2014 1:02 am » wrote: But I CAN promise this: We won't restore this land to justice, to lawfuness or to prosperity WITHOUT conservatism in the partnership that does the heavy lifting.

Daddy, we miss you. Please come home.

Ya... Some poor sucker's gotta pay the **** bills.