I Think He Meant "Moronotonically"...

1 2 3 4 5 8
User avatar
Blackvegetable
18 Mar 2025 7:09 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
37,836 posts
I have some numbers here: If only people who had voted in 2022 had voted, Harris would have won the popular vote and also the Electoral College fairly easily. But if everyone had voted, Trump would have won the popular vote by nearly five points. And generally what you see now is that every measure of socioeconomic status and political engagement is just monotonically related to your chance of liking Trump.

 What is monotonically?
 Oh, yeah. Sorry.

 This is why Democrats can’t win. [Laughs.]

 That’s exactly right. I’m the problem.It’s basically that the lower your political engagement, education level or socioeconomic status, the less engaged you are in politics, the more Trumpy you are. And that just wasn’t true four years ago.


https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/18/opin ... -shor.html



Steve told ya....

https://youtu.be/KHJbSvidohg?si=UzPPcyPNg4p4ieLt
 
User avatar
Sumela
18 Mar 2025 8:16 pm
User avatar
      
22,770 posts
MErrKKKA is funny...hehehe
User avatar
ConsRule
18 Mar 2025 8:45 pm
User avatar
     
3,326 posts
Blackvegetable » 18 Mar 2025, 7:09 pm » wrote: I have some numbers here: If only people who had voted in 2022 had voted, Harris would have won the popular vote and also the Electoral College fairly easily. But if everyone had voted, Trump would have won the popular vote by nearly five points. And generally what you see now is that every measure of socioeconomic status and political engagement is just monotonically related to your chance of liking Trump.

 What is monotonically?
 Oh, yeah. Sorry.

 This is why Democrats can’t win. [Laughs.]

 That’s exactly right. I’m the problem.It’s basically that the lower your political engagement, education level or socioeconomic status, the less engaged you are in politics, the more Trumpy you are. And that just wasn’t true four years ago.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/18/opin ... -shor.html


Steve told ya....

https://youtu.be/KHJbSvidohg?si=UzPPcyPNg4p4ieLt
Another liberal Op-Ed in a liberal rag.

I'm shocked...SHOCKED I TELL YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
User avatar
Sumela
18 Mar 2025 8:49 pm
User avatar
      
22,770 posts
ConsRule » 18 Mar 2025, 8:45 pm » wrote: Another liberal Op-Ed in a liberal rag.

I'm shocked...SHOCKED I TELL YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You and BV are the opposite sides of the same coin.  You ****.
 
User avatar
ROG62
19 Mar 2025 12:17 am
User avatar
      
20,124 posts
Blackvegetable » 18 Mar 2025, 7:09 pm » wrote: I have some numbers here: If only people who had voted in 2022 had voted, Harris would have won the popular vote and also the Electoral College fairly easily. But if everyone had voted, Trump would have won the popular vote by nearly five points. And generally what you see now is that every measure of socioeconomic status and political engagement is just monotonically related to your chance of liking Trump.

 What is monotonically?
 Oh, yeah. Sorry.

 This is why Democrats can’t win. [Laughs.]

 That’s exactly right. I’m the problem.It’s basically that the lower your political engagement, education level or socioeconomic status, the less engaged you are in politics, the more Trumpy you are. And that just wasn’t true four years ago.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/18/opin ... -shor.html


Steve told ya....

https://youtu.be/KHJbSvidohg?si=UzPPcyPNg4p4ieLt
brown, it's obvious NYSlime's opinions are worth less than the hole I leave in a snowbank after taking a good piss... 
 
Image JuCo 5 percenter... “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." brown's unheeded words of wisdom :rofl:
User avatar
*GHETTO BLASTER
19 Mar 2025 12:55 am
User avatar
      
13,318 posts
Blackvegetable » 18 Mar 2025, 7:09 pm » wrote: I have some numbers here: If only people who had voted in 2022 had voted, Harris would have won the popular vote and also the Electoral College fairly easily. But if everyone had voted, Trump would have won the popular vote by nearly five points. And generally what you see now is that every measure of socioeconomic status and political engagement is just monotonically related to your chance of liking Trump.

 What is monotonically?
 Oh, yeah. Sorry.

 This is why Democrats can’t win. [Laughs.]

 That’s exactly right. I’m the problem.It’s basically that the lower your political engagement, education level or socioeconomic status, the less engaged you are in politics, the more Trumpy you are. And that just wasn’t true four years ago.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/18/opin ... -shor.html


Steve told ya....

https://youtu.be/KHJbSvidohg?si=UzPPcyPNg4p4ieLt
You're so **** stupid and poorly educated you think ****** have contributed just as much as Caucasians have to the advancement of  mankind....... Image  
 
 https://youtu.be/D7V76B1RTY0?si=6IdQPElMrYm5nIAx
 
User avatar
Blackvegetable
19 Mar 2025 5:33 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
37,836 posts
ConsRule » 18 Mar 2025, 8:45 pm » wrote: Another liberal Op-Ed in a liberal rag.

I'm shocked...SHOCKED I TELL YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yell at the facts, Cunnstance...

How about listing some of your sources?


Save bandwidth - answer the question. 
User avatar
Blackvegetable
19 Mar 2025 5:41 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
37,836 posts
*GHETTOBLASTER » 19 Mar 2025, 12:55 am » wrote: You're so **** stupid and poorly educated you think ****** have contributed just as much as Caucasians have to the advancement of  mankind....... Image  
 
 https://youtu.be/D7V76B1RTY0?si=6IdQPElMrYm5nIAx
You're hurt...


 
User avatar
Blackvegetable
19 Mar 2025 5:42 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
37,836 posts
ROG62 » 19 Mar 2025, 12:17 am » wrote: brown, it's obvious NYSlime's opinions are worth less than the hole I leave in a snowbank after taking a good piss...
It's stats, JuCo...



List your sources...
 
User avatar
*GHETTO BLASTER
19 Mar 2025 8:45 am
User avatar
      
13,318 posts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_p ... ific_field

My belief system is full of wins and yours is full of ****............ :rofl:  
User avatar
Cedar
19 Mar 2025 9:55 am
User avatar
Cannonpointer's Internet Barrister
Cannonpointer's Internet Barrister
2,364 posts
Blackvegetable » 18 Mar 2025, 7:09 pm » wrote: I have some numbers here: If only people who had voted in 2022 had voted, Harris would have won the popular vote and also the Electoral College fairly easily. But if everyone had voted, Trump would have won the popular vote by nearly five points. And generally what you see now is that every measure of socioeconomic status and political engagement is just monotonically related to your chance of liking Trump.

 What is monotonically?
 Oh, yeah. Sorry.

 This is why Democrats can’t win. [Laughs.]

 That’s exactly right. I’m the problem.It’s basically that the lower your political engagement, education level or socioeconomic status, the less engaged you are in politics, the more Trumpy you are. And that just wasn’t true four years ago.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/18/opin ... -shor.html


Steve told ya....

https://youtu.be/KHJbSvidohg?si=UzPPcyPNg4p4ieLt
Image
 
User avatar
*Huey
19 Mar 2025 9:57 am
User avatar
      
24,588 posts
Blackvegetable » 18 Mar 2025, 7:09 pm » wrote: I have some numbers here: If only people who had voted in 2022 had voted, Harris would have won the popular vote and also the Electoral College fairly easily. But if everyone had voted, Trump would have won the popular vote by nearly five points. And generally what you see now is that every measure of socioeconomic status and political engagement is just monotonically related to your chance of liking Trump.

 What is monotonically?
 Oh, yeah. Sorry.

 This is why Democrats can’t win. [Laughs.]

 That’s exactly right. I’m the problem.It’s basically that the lower your political engagement, education level or socioeconomic status, the less engaged you are in politics, the more Trumpy you are. And that just wasn’t true four years ago.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/18/opin ... -shor.html


Steve told ya....

https://youtu.be/KHJbSvidohg?si=UzPPcyPNg4p4ieLt

You are really butt hurt.  Love the spin though.  Your masters are getting more creative.
User avatar
Blackvegetable
19 Mar 2025 10:30 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
37,836 posts
*Huey » 19 Mar 2025, 9:57 am » wrote: You are really butt hurt.  Love the spin though.  Your masters are getting more creative.
Make the case that it is "spin", Tiny...
User avatar
Blackvegetable
19 Mar 2025 10:31 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
37,836 posts
Cheddy,

Fly your moronotonic freak flag high...
 
User avatar
*Huey
19 Mar 2025 10:32 am
User avatar
      
24,588 posts
Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 10:30 am » wrote: Make the case that it is "spin", Tiny...

To quote Justice Potter Stewart, "I know it when I see it"...
User avatar
Blackvegetable
19 Mar 2025 10:36 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
37,836 posts
*Huey » 19 Mar 2025, 10:32 am » wrote: To quote Justice Potter Stewart, "I know it when I see it"...

Image

But he wasn't an idiot....you surely are..
User avatar
*Huey
19 Mar 2025 10:41 am
User avatar
      
24,588 posts
Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 10:36 am » wrote: Image

But he wasn't an idiot....you surely are..

Another sign you are in a Meltdown and are butthurt.  Go ahead and explain what issue you with that map.
User avatar
Blackvegetable
19 Mar 2025 10:43 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
37,836 posts
*Huey » 19 Mar 2025, 10:41 am » wrote: Another sign you are in a Meltdown and are butthurt.  Go ahead and explain what issue you with that map.
Already done...hundreds of times...
 
User avatar
*Huey
19 Mar 2025 10:44 am
User avatar
      
24,588 posts
Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 10:43 am » wrote: Already done...hundreds of times...

ALERT.......ALERT......WE HAVE A RUNNER. 
User avatar
Blackvegetable
19 Mar 2025 10:44 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
37,836 posts
*Huey » 19 Mar 2025, 10:44 am » wrote: ALERT.......ALERT......WE HAVE A RUNNER.
Tell me how many times I have to explain it to you.


 
1 2 3 4 5 8

Who is online

In total there are 2085 users online :: 4 registered, 13 bots, and 2068 guests
Bots: oBot, DuckDuckBot, Applebot, proximic, Mediapartners-Google, facebookexternalhit, ADmantX, YandexBot, semantic-visions.com, Googlebot, curl/7, linkfluence.com, bingbot
Updated 3 minutes ago
© 2012-2025 Liberal Forum