Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 10:44 am

Tell me how many times I have to explain it to you.

I answered you question CORRECTLY about the shorter for like the 50th time.  Your turn.  What issue do you have with that map?

For context that map is the track of Dorian about 8 days from actual landfall.  At the time the map shows the predicted track AT THE TIME (8 days out) of crossing FL Ito the Gulf with slight NW direction.  Which meant it could possible put AL at risk. 

SO, what issue ya got with that?

*Huey » 19 Mar 2025, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 10:48 am

I answered you question CORRECTLY about the shorter for like the 50th time.  Your turn.  What issue do you have with that map?

For context that map is the track of Dorian about 8 days from actual landfall.  At the time the map shows the predicted track AT THE TIME (8 days out) of crossing FL Ito the Gulf with slight NW direction.  Which meant it could possible put AL at risk. 

SO, what issue ya got with that?

I answered you question CORRECTLY about the shorter for like the 50th time

This is two lies.

For context that map is the track of Dorian about 8 days from actual landfall. 

No, it isn't..

It is a map defaced by a **** sharpie.

Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 10:52 am

This is two lies.

No, it isn't..

It is a map defaced by a **** sharpie.

OH MY GOD!!!  THE PRESIDENT TOOK A SHARPY TOO IT!  BRING ON THE **** FIRING MORON.

             

@Blackvegetable   has spent years perfecting the art of dodging, deflecting, and demanding answers while refusing to give any himself...the first time asked. The evidence speaks for itself—post after post, he drills others with endless questions, demands, and insults, yet the moment he’s asked to defend his own words, he scrambles to turn it around on everyone else. He never actually engages, never provides original thoughts, and never stands by his own arguments. It’s pure cowardice, classic narcissism, and a desperate attempt to avoid being held accountable for the nonsense he spews. Now, let’s take a look at just how deep the hypocrisy runs.

This is all of his quotes defending his own OP. Let me repeat that, this is his OP, and look at what he does. Constantly turning it on everyone else , so he doesn't have to defend anything.

Yell at the facts, Cunnstance...

How about listing some of your sources?


Save bandwidth - answer the question. 

You're hurt...

 

It's stats, JuCo...



List your sources...

 Make the case that it is "spin", Tiny...

Cheddy,

Fly your moronotonic freak flag high...

But he wasn't an idiot....you surely are..

Already done...hundreds of times...

Another flat out lie ^^^

Tell me how many times I have to explain it to you.

 

Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 10:31 am

Cheddy,

Fly your moronotonic freak flag high...

“ Trump supporters are so stoopid”

**chuckle** 
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 10:52 am

This is two lies.

No, it isn't..

It is a map defaced by a **** sharpie.

Yes, that is what it is;

Dorian made landfall in the US Sep 6th.  That map is dated 9 Aug.  You lose.

*Huey » 19 Mar 2025, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 10:58 am

Yes, that is what it is;

Dorian made landfall in the US Sep 6th.  That map is dated 9 Aug.  You lose.

Close enough..

In a White House video released Wednesday, Trump displays a modified National Hurricane Center “cone of uncertainty” forecast, dated from 11 a.m. on Aug. 29, indicating Alabama would in fact be affected. The graphic appears to have been altered with a Sharpie to indicate a risk the storm would move into Alabama from Florida

https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/ ... tter-flub/

how do I "lose"?
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:06 am

Close enough..

In a White House video released Wednesday, Trump displays a modified National Hurricane Center “cone of uncertainty” forecast, dated from 11 a.m. on Aug. 29, indicating Alabama would in fact be affected. The graphic appears to have been altered with a Sharpie to indicate a risk the storm would move into Alabama from Florida

https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/ ... tter-flub/

how do I "lose"?

I guess this needs to be added to the long list of evasions. 

Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:06 am

Close enough..

In a White House video released Wednesday, Trump displays a modified National Hurricane Center “cone of uncertainty” forecast, dated from 11 a.m. on Aug. 29, indicating Alabama would in fact be affected. The graphic appears to have been altered with a Sharpie to indicate a risk the storm would move into Alabama from Florida

https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/ ... tter-flub/

how do I "lose"?

If you look at the track at the time it is exactly what I said it was.  But hey, your masters told you to be upset about this, so your are.

Keep looking STOOPID, Karen.  

*Huey » 19 Mar 2025, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:08 am

If you look at the track at the time it is exactly what I said it was.  But hey, your masters told you to be upset about this, so your are.

Keep looking STOOPID, Karen.

Here you go again.

Wrong on the facts, you launch into yet another narrative..
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:10 am

Here you go again.

Wrong on the facts, you launch into yet another narrative..

THat's what I posted earlier.  Just be clear you are saying the cone of uncertainty did NOT show a possible Track wNW.

Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:10 am

Here you go again.

Wrong on the facts, you launch into yet another narrative..

        Oh the hypocrisy. You are accusing someone else of a "here we again?" The master of broken records has just exposed a flagrant projection...we all know what that means...Mary is in the house.

Cedar » 19 Mar 2025, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 10:56 am

“ Trump supporters are so stoopid”

**chuckle**

*Huey » 19 Mar 2025, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:11 am

THat's what I posted earlier.  Just be clear you are saying the cone of uncertainty did NOT show a possible Track wNW.

Looks like you triggered Mary. He just graced us with a flagrant projection. That's always sure evidence that Mary is in the house. 

Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:14 am

 

No thoughts, etc...copy/paste.

Vegas » 19 Mar 2025, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:14 am

Looks like you triggered Mary. He just graced us with a flagrant projection. That's always sure evidence that Mary is in the house.

He even dug deep into is creepy stalky file system and created another tribute thread about me.

Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:14 am

How many did you get?

*Huey » 19 Mar 2025, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:11 am

THat's what I posted earlier.  Just be clear you are saying the cone of uncertainty did NOT show a possible Track wNW.

We've gone over this...

The map to which you refer was color coded...each color band represented a probability range.

You consistently refused to answer a question about what probable event was predicted for the 3 inch sliver of Alabama in question.  
 

*Huey » 19 Mar 2025, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:17 am

How many did you get?

OrangeManGreatToadyofthe2ndBesty, please...

Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:17 am

We've gone over this...

The map to which you refer was color coded...each color band represented a probability range.

You consistently refused to answer a question about what probable event was predicted for the 3 inch sliver of Alabama in question.

Thanks for admitting there was a probability of AL being affected.  Appreciate it.