Liberal Forum

*Huey » 19 Mar 2025, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:18 am

Thanks for admitting there was a probability of AL being affected.  Appreciate it.

Tiny,

That's why you use a vague term like "affected ...

What was the event predicted?
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:18 am

OrangeManGreatToadyofthe2ndBesty, please...

Did you take his mug shot down from your bedroom wall after he won the electoral college, won the popular vote, and won all the the swing states?

*Huey » 19 Mar 2025, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:20 am

Did you take his mug shot down from your bedroom wall after he won the electoral college, won the popular vote, and won all the the swing states?

Why "didn't" you cast a 3rd enthusiastic vote for him?

Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:19 am

Tiny,

That's why you use a vague term like "affected ...

What was the event predicted?

You tell me.  It is about what I said and I said, as that map shows 8 DAYS OUT, there was a chance AL would the storm.

Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:21 am

Why "didn't" you cast a 3rd enthusiastic vote for him?

Another repeat question. 
 

*Huey » 19 Mar 2025, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:21 am

You tell me.  It is about what I said and I said, as that map shows 8 DAYS OUT, there was a chance AL would the storm.

It's your "case".

Just answer the question asked.
 

*Huey » 19 Mar 2025, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:21 am

Another repeat question.

you don't have issues repeating.

You even insist I must repeat your words...

Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:22 am

It's your "case".

Just answer the question asked.

You were answered.  This is just a diversion from the severe *** kicking you are getting elsewhere.  Hell, you ran from that.

Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:23 am

you don't have issues repeating.

You even insist I must repeat your words...

 
 

*Huey » 19 Mar 2025, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:25 am

You were answered.  This is just a diversion from the severe *** kicking you are getting elsewhere.  Hell, you ran from that.

There's no asskicking....just you rehashing long debunked assertions because you can't handle being wrong...

 

Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:27 am

There's no asskicking....just you rehashing long debunked assertions because you can't handle being wrong...

The citations show I am correct.  1 family, multiple designs and the BATF uses machine gun as the classification of the M 26, or any automatic firearm for that matter.  The BATF does not classify the Shorter, or any later make or model that is semi automatic as a machine gun.

You have posted NOTHING that changes that.

*Huey » 19 Mar 2025, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:31 am

The citations show I am correct.  1 family, multiple designs and the BATF uses machine gun as the classification of the M 26, or any automatic firearm for that matter.  The BATF does not classify the Shorter, or any later make or model that is semi automatic as a machine gun.

You have posted NOTHING that changes that.

They CLEARLY indicate that two weapons were submitted...the second "modified so as not to be a machine gun"..
.
What was the orher weapon?
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:33 am

They CLEARLY indicate that two weapons were submitted...the second "modified so as not to be a machine gun"..
.
What was the orher weapon?

No, changed the weapon in basic design......

 

*Huey » 19 Mar 2025, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:36 am

No, changed the weapon in basic design......

Changed what weapon?
 
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:19 am

Tiny,

That's why you use a vague term like "affected ...

What was the event predicted?

8 days out  used terms like that.  

You keep lying about what I say and you expect me to answer questions?  You are a **** hoot.

Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:37 am

Changed what weapon?

Dude, this over.  You lost.

Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:14 am

And? Did you buy any?
 

*Huey » 19 Mar 2025, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 11:41 am

Dude, this over.  You lost.

Thank you for making my case again 

Blackvegetable » 19 Mar 2025, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 10:30 am

Make the case that it is "spin", Tiny...

It's very simple, dickhead!

You've got the WORST public schools in the country that have been run by liberal Democrats for decades, regularly graduating students who are functionally illiterate, and those cities predominantly vote Democrat IN EVERY ELECTION!

Would even a liberal as dumb as you choose to send your kids to one of the hundreds of failing schools in Detroit? In Milwaukee?  In Newark?  In Buffalo?
Explain why EVERY ONE of those liberal cities fail to educate their kids, and yet a dope like you think the LEAST intelligent are those voters who support Trump, despite the fact that these uneducated masses will ALWAYS vote OVERWHELMINGLY for Democrats?

Here are the top 5 WORST school systems in the country. 
Notice any patterns there, nitwit?:

50 Worst U.S. Cities for Education: A Ranking of Underperforming School SystemsMoney By Lily Wordsmith October 2, 2024
1) Detroit
2) Cleveland
3) Baltimore
4) Milwaukee
5) Fresno

Care to explain how it is that you think voters in Detroit, for example, are smarter than Trump supporters when the Detroit public schools have been failing so miserably for decades like this?:

The results for 2024 show a mere 7% of Detroit fourth-graders are proficient in math, while it was just 4% for eighth-graders. In reading, only 5% of fourth graders tested proficient, and 6% of eighth-graders.

Think it's much different in Buffalo?  In Newark?  In Chicago?  In St. Louis?  In Flint?  In Savannah?

My state of NJ has the top ranking for education in the country, and yet I've seen first-hand how ignorant the graduated students from our most populous urban cities really are when they came to my company looking for a job.  Most (easily 80%) filled out job applications that were truly laughable if they weren't so pathetic, because the fact is that these "graduates" didn't even understand how stupid they were!  They think that since they were graduated, their education was equal to that of even the average students in most other states. 

Or maybe you think the kids pushed through those failing schools suddenly become smart when the enter the voting booth and continue selecting the same liberal Democrats that has kept them so ignorant for so many years?

Zeets2 » 19 Mar 2025, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Mar 2025, 12:04 pm

It's very simple, dickhead!

You've got the WORST public schools in the country that have been run by liberal Democrats for decades, regularly graduating students who are functionally illiterate, and those cities predominantly vote Democrat IN EVERY ELECTION!

Would even a liberal as dumb as you choose to send your kids to one of the hundreds of failing schools in Detroit? In Milwaukee?  In Newark?  In Buffalo?
Explain why EVERY ONE of those liberal cities fail to educate their kids, and yet a dope like you think the LEAST intelligent are those voters who support Trump, despite the fact that these uneducated masses will ALWAYS vote OVERWHELMINGLY for Democrats?

Here are the top 5 WORST school systems in the country. 
Notice any patterns there, nitwit?:

Care to explain how it is that you think voters in Detroit, for example, are smarter than Trump supporters when the Detroit public schools have been failing so miserably for decades like this?:

Think it's much different in Buffalo?  In Newark?  In Chicago?  In St. Louis?  In Flint?  In Savannah?

My state of NJ has the top ranking for education in the country, and yet I've seen first-hand how ignorant the graduated students from our most populous urban cities really are when they came to my company looking for a job.  Most (easily 80%) filled out job applications that were truly laughable if they weren't so pathetic, because the fact is that these "graduates" didn't even understand how stupid they were!  They think that since they were graduated, their education was equal to that of even the average students in most other states. 

Or maybe you think the kids pushed through those failing schools suddenly become smart when the enter the voting booth and continue selecting the same liberal Democrats that has kept them so ignorant for so many years?

So where do the PhDs of APSA stand on Grifty?