Just what I read and researchedJohnnyYou » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ So what did you learn about Jack Ruby? Man that's just another layer on the dip for the chips.
I follow the facts of this caseJohnnyYou » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ So what did you learn about Jack Ruby? Man that's just another layer on the dip for the chips.
I heard he was pretty far gone mentally. And that hallucinogenics and the CIA may have been involved.HarperLee » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Just what I read and researched
He owned night clubs in Dallas and was heavily in debt.
He walked into the Dallas Police Station and shot Oswald.
Years later he told his brother he did it alone and was no part of any conspiracy.
There's never been any evidence he was "ordered" to kill Oswald.
Nothing
I read the same...JohnnyYou » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I heard he was pretty far gone mentally. And that hallucinogenics and the CIA may have been involved.
He did have cancer and died pretty miserably.
That's why the conspiracy theories survives from my perspective. There are so many balls of wax and the onion has never really been skinned definitivelyHarperLee » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I read the same...
Hard to believe that the CIA would recruit Ruby and then allow him to sit in jail for years where he MIGHT spill the beans....
Why not just murder Oswald right after the assassination?
Could have been done by a rogue cop on the take....??
Instead Oswald is alive 2 days and Ruby for years.
Doesn't sound like a very good moping up job.
The theories are interesting and good reading.JohnnyYou » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ That's why the conspiracy theories survives from my perspective. There are so many balls of wax and the onion has never really been skinned definitively
It's a 60 year old story now.
HarperLee » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The theories are interesting and good reading.
But when it comes to facts it gets weak.
I originally felt it was a conspiracy.
However, when dug into it was more speculation and more people involved.
Just today we discovered that someone in the government ordered the Dallas Police NOT to give Oswald a lawyer....
However, numerous DAs and police officers said the complete officer.
If someone is in your house illegally would they be removed?JohnnyYou » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Well Trump isn't giving immigrants due process so there we are today.. I am sure if Elonosaurus Wreks doesn't want me to have a lawyer I'll be buried in the Project 2025 Gulag, alive or dead.
I have been considering having my remains composted and turned into the tomatoes.
Me too. The fact is the debate is what is legal, The immigrants pay more in tax revenue than the toothless red hats. I am all for taking their safety net away and stop paying for the world that owes them a living.HarperLee » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ If someone is in your house illegally would they be removed?
Or would you give them "due process"?
I have zero tolerance for anyone in this country illegally
how did oswald shoot kennedy when kennedy was behind the sign?HarperLee » 47 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I follow the facts of this case
If you believe in this massive conspiracy then you just add on more conspirators when you need to.
Now we're told that someone ordered Dallas Police not to give Oswald a lawyer??
Any evidence of this?
Of course not ..
Just another wild claim thrown in the mix.
That's the benefit of conspiracies.
Been explainedjerrab » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ how did oswald shoot kennedy when kennedy was behind the sign?
https://youtu.be/_zwG3QdPLfw?si=aOWERaKrsHdsYotW
JohnnyYou » Yesterday, 6:41 pm » wrote: ↑ I hear ya.. I just think we have our heads stuck in the America First Hole and our azzes are going to get incinerated in nuclear fireballs.
I refuse to accept there are things I can't change. If it kills me I'll come back stronger.
what america needs to do is have israel treat gaza fairly, stop all this talk about evicting the people in gaza to africa and for a peace agreement and the 2 state solution to take place. that would be putting our needs first because russia will give weapons to iran and there is a good possibility of ww3. put our needs ahead of what israel wants, total control of the whole area, the bs that God promised israel to the jews is just bs.DeezerShoove » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ What you are basically saying is our own citizenry is wrong in feeling that our own country's needs should come before another country's?
In a world where NO OTHER COUNTRY puts the needs of another country first, why should we be the only one that does?
I would bet my life that the next wartime nuke set off in the world will NOT be USA, Russia, China, etc.
It will be a **** with nothing to lose... Pick one. Your guess is a good as mine.
jerrab » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ what america needs to do is have israel treat gaza fairly, stop all this talk about evicting the people in gaza to africa and for a peace agreement and the 2 state solution to take place. that would be putting our needs first because russia will give weapons to iran and there is a good possibility of ww3. put our needs ahead of what israel wants, total control of the whole area, the bs that God promised israel to the jews is just bs.
It's been explained over the last 60 years....
HarperLee » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ It's been explained over the last 60 years....
There's simply no credible evidence of 5 shooters there that day
I never believed that God gave israel to the jews.DeezerShoove » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I don't think God even chose Earth itself, much less a tiny percentage of the animals that live on it.
Ancient stories handed down by superstitious people fail to impress me.
Name all the Human Being Owners Manuals (Bible, Torah, Koran, Dianetics, etc)...
All written by attention whores... Sorry for the blasphemy.
I don't care about that whole rat's nest. The Hatfield/McCoy Feud on a bigger scale.
Yes